> 2009/12/16 K. K. Subramaniam <
[hidden email]>
>
>> On Wednesday 16 December 2009 11:47:50 pm José Luis Redrejo wrote:
>>
>>> b) has caused the current delay in Debian, because I've been waiting for
>> 6
>>> months, just in case anybody wants to help. I've already given up, so I
>>> will upload the latest version before the end of this month. Before the
>>> setting up of the collaborative project I kept the squeak-vm very
>> updated
>>> in Debian. In fact I used to compile it from svn, to get the latest
>>> patches, trying to make the images work with the newest plugins.
>> José,
>>
>> What do you think of the new launcher scripts - squeak and squeak.sh? Do
>> they
>> have enough flexibility for a distro packager?
>>
>>
> squeak.sh has the same problem I've discussed once again in this list for
> the last four years: they are developer focused. I don't have anything
> against a developer view, but I want the squeak packages being end-user
> friendly. I'm very focused/biased on the educational uses of Squeak, and I
> don't think a console script is a good idea these days.
> I will integrate the changes these scripts have, so the one I use in the
> package can be called from a terminal, but I want to keep the gnome/kde and
> mime integration I added to the squeak-vm package.
Locked
