thanks this is a good suggestion.
Stef On 12 oct. 07, at 17:44, Alejandro Gonzalez wrote: > I don't know neither what Gwenaël's master dissertation is about > nor what the effort would be, but I think that having a browser > that can show you the changes a refactoring will perform before > committing plus having the ability to select which of these changes > apply or not would be really nice to have. > I've been working in the refactoring engine for my dissertation too > (trait aware refactorings). > I also worked in the refactoring browser until I discovered the > omnibrowser in the dev image which is far more better than the former. > On my way I fixed (or at least I made them pass) several failing > tests. Also, other tests required user input during the running and > I improved them so they can run silently. May be many of them were > already fixed by this moment. > I have all of this in my image but I'm interested on joining the > team responsible for this tool (if any)....how can I contribute > with my two cents? > Alejandro > > On 10/12/07, Damien Cassou <[hidden email] > wrote:Please > commit directly to the main repository. > > 2007/10/12, Gwenaël Casaccio < [hidden email]>: > > Thanks, at this time I try to correct the different problems on the > > refactoring browser unit tests. > > > > 2007/10/11, Damien Cassou < [hidden email]>: > > > Hi Gwenaël, > > > > > > the project you are interested in is hosted on SqueakSource: > > > http://www.squeaksource.com/RefactoringEngine. > > > > > > I think that the main target for this project is to clean the > code and > > > make the tests run. > > > > > > 2007/10/11, Gwenaël Casaccio < [hidden email]>: > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > For my master dissertation I'll work on the refactoring > tools. Do you have > > > > any suggestions to improve the refactoring browser and to add > better > > > > refactorings ? > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > Gwenael Casaccio > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Damien Cassou > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Damien Cassou > > > > > |
In reply to this post by Philippe Marschall
yes this is a quite difficult one. Bt indeed this would be sooooo great.
Stef On 12 oct. 07, at 20:02, Philippe Marschall wrote: > 2007/10/11, Gwenaël Casaccio <[hidden email]>: >> Hi >> >> For my master dissertation I'll work on the refactoring tools. Do >> you have >> any suggestions to improve the refactoring browser and to add better >> refactorings ? > > Kepp the formatting of methods. > > Cheers > Philippe > |
In reply to this post by Chris Muller-3
chris
could you merge your changes on RB formatter. I know that gutenberg could be used too. Damien what is the status of gutenberg? Because it would be cool to have a goo code formatter for squeak. Stef On 16 oct. 07, at 03:19, Chris Muller wrote: > True, unless the code was formatted with the RB Formatter in the > first place. > > I tweaked my image so that Alt+Shift+S RB formats and incorporated it > into my "save gesture". Therefore, as more of my code becomes > formatted per the RB Formatter, the diffs are true. I tweaked the RB > Formatter to format in Rectangular Block recommended by Kent Beck. > > What's even MORE inconvenient is the way, starting in the 3.9 image, > RB Formatter now strips (some) comments out of your code. Not a very > good thing to do, given the seeming high-advocacy for commenting code > in this community; our own tools are working against us in this > matter! > > I fixed at least a couple of comment-stripping plague from the various > RbNodes but there is still at least one more. :( > > > On 10/15/07, Damien Cassou <[hidden email]> wrote: >> 2007/10/12, Philippe Marschall <[hidden email]>: >>> 2007/10/11, Gwenaël Casaccio <[hidden email]>: >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> For my master dissertation I'll work on the refactoring tools. >>>> Do you have >>>> any suggestions to improve the refactoring browser and to add >>>> better >>>> refactorings ? >>> >>> Kepp the formatting of methods. >> >> This behavior is really inconvenient. When you have a method and you >> operate a refactoring on it, the indentation and formatting is >> completely changed, making the diff unreadable. >> >> -- >> Damien Cassou >> >> >> >> > |
Ok, I merged them. File is on the Mantis report.
On 10/20/07, stephane ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote: > chris > > could you merge your changes on RB formatter. I know that gutenberg > could be used too. > Damien what is the status of gutenberg? > Because it would be cool to have a goo code formatter for squeak. > > Stef > > On 16 oct. 07, at 03:19, Chris Muller wrote: > > > True, unless the code was formatted with the RB Formatter in the > > first place. > > > > I tweaked my image so that Alt+Shift+S RB formats and incorporated it > > into my "save gesture". Therefore, as more of my code becomes > > formatted per the RB Formatter, the diffs are true. I tweaked the RB > > Formatter to format in Rectangular Block recommended by Kent Beck. > > > > What's even MORE inconvenient is the way, starting in the 3.9 image, > > RB Formatter now strips (some) comments out of your code. Not a very > > good thing to do, given the seeming high-advocacy for commenting code > > in this community; our own tools are working against us in this > > matter! > > > > I fixed at least a couple of comment-stripping plague from the various > > RbNodes but there is still at least one more. :( > > > > > > On 10/15/07, Damien Cassou <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> 2007/10/12, Philippe Marschall <[hidden email]>: > >>> 2007/10/11, Gwenaël Casaccio <[hidden email]>: > >>>> Hi > >>>> > >>>> For my master dissertation I'll work on the refactoring tools. > >>>> Do you have > >>>> any suggestions to improve the refactoring browser and to add > >>>> better > >>>> refactorings ? > >>> > >>> Kepp the formatting of methods. > >> > >> This behavior is really inconvenient. When you have a method and you > >> operate a refactoring on it, the indentation and formatting is > >> completely changed, making the diff unreadable. > >> > >> -- > >> Damien Cassou > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |