Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi everyone,
This is a summary of what is done on improving refactorings. Refactoring(enhancement) - Extract to temporary(renaming duplicates) - Rename method(permutation of args) - Rename inst var(renames accessors) For more details read my blog: http://myfuncoding.blogspot.fr/2014/07/improved-refactorings.html Feedback & re-tweets are welcome:) Best, Mark |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks a lot mark !
This is really cool to see how fast you are going. Stef On 22/7/14 11:00, Mark Rizun wrote: > Hi everyone, > > This is a summary of what is done on improving refactorings. > /Refactoring(enhancement)/ > - Extract to temporary(renaming duplicates) > - Rename method(permutation of args) > - Rename inst var(renames accessors) > For more details read my blog: > http://myfuncoding.blogspot.fr/2014/07/improved-refactorings.html > Feedback & re-tweets are welcome:) > > Best, > Mark > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Refactoring-project-improvements-tp4769273.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ... [show rest of quote] |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by Mark Rizun
Hi Mark,
Thanks for taking care of improving the refactoring tools. Just a side note, if you modify the Extract to temporary refactoring to change all the references (as your blog post suggest) then exists cases when this is no longer a refactoring. If the extracted code has side effects is not the same to send this messages one or several times and a refactoring is supposed to be safe.
I think you should let the old behavior as a refactoring, and add this new one (very useful indeed) making clear that is not a refactoring. Regards, Gabriel On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 6:00 AM, Mark Rizun <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi everyone, ... [show rest of quote] |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi Gabriel, I agree with you that my "extract to temp" may be not really a refactoring anymore. And maybe you're right about adding extra option, I should think about it.
Thanks Mark 2014-07-23 13:33 GMT+02:00 Gabriel Cotelli <[hidden email]>:
... [show rest of quote] |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |