Refactoring to traits / Refactoring traits

> Hello everybody!
>
> I'm starting a research on refactorings & traits as part of a project ( that
> luckily :-) could end as my thesis ).
> Since I'm a newbie, my fist step is this email.
> The idea and scope are not closed yet but at a first glance the idea is to
> add refatoring tools to Squeak for traits, but this original idea may
> slightly change since it is being defined as I get knowledge about the
> topic.
> Every paper, link, idea, resource, suggestion about this topic will be
> happily welcomed.
> For sure, as soon as I make some progress, I'll share the results with any
> interested on this thread.

> Hello everybody!
>
> I'm starting a research on refactorings & traits as part of a  
> project ( that luckily :-) could end as my thesis ).
> Since I'm a newbie, my fist step is this email.
> The idea and scope are not closed yet but at a first glance the  
> idea is to add refatoring tools to Squeak for traits, but this  
> original idea may slightly change since it is being defined as I  
> get knowledge about the topic.
> Every paper, link, idea, resource, suggestion about this topic will  
> be happily welcomed.
> For sure, as soon as I make some progress, I'll share the results  
> with any interested on this thread.

>> Hello everybody!
>>
>> I'm starting a research on refactorings & traits as part of a  
>> project ( that luckily :-) could end as my thesis ).
>> Since I'm a newbie, my fist step is this email.
>> The idea and scope are not closed yet but at a first glance the  
>> idea is to add refatoring tools to Squeak for traits, but this  
>> original idea may slightly change since it is being defined as I  
>> get knowledge about the topic.
>> Every paper, link, idea, resource, suggestion about this topic  
>> will be happily welcomed.
>> For sure, as soon as I make some progress, I'll share the results  
>> with any interested on this thread.
>
> Good idea, yes. You should evaluate the Refactoring Browser  
> (Refactoring Engine). I just hacked it a little so that Tratis are  
> treated like classes. This
> is for sure not what is needed... it should be extended to know  
> about Traits and then we need support for "refactoring towards"  
> traits.
>
> Should be a nice topic.
>
>     Marcus
>

>Hello everybody!
>
>I'm starting a research on refactorings & traits as part of a  project (
>that luckily :-) could end as my thesis ).
>Since I'm a newbie, my fist step is this email.
>The idea and scope are not closed yet but at a first glance the  idea is to
>add refatoring tools to Squeak for traits, but this  original idea may
>slightly change since it is being defined as I  get knowledge about the
>topic.
>Every paper, link, idea, resource, suggestion about this topic will  be
>happily welcomed.
>For sure, as soon as I make some progress, I'll share the results  with any
>interested on this thread.

>
> Regards,
> Alejandro G.
>
> ----Original Message Follows----
> From: Marcus Denker <[hidden email]>
> Reply-To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list<squeak-
> [hidden email]>
> To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list<squeak-
> [hidden email]>
> Subject: Re: Refactoring to traits / Refactoring traits
> Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 16:13:17 +0200
>
>
> On 02.10.2006, at 12:55, Alejandro Gonzalez wrote:
>
>> Hello everybody!
>>
>> I'm starting a research on refactorings & traits as part of a  
>> project ( that luckily :-) could end as my thesis ).
>> Since I'm a newbie, my fist step is this email.
>> The idea and scope are not closed yet but at a first glance the  
>> idea is to add refatoring tools to Squeak for traits, but this  
>> original idea may slightly change since it is being defined as I  
>> get knowledge about the topic.
>> Every paper, link, idea, resource, suggestion about this topic  
>> will  be happily welcomed.
>> For sure, as soon as I make some progress, I'll share the results  
>> with any interested on this thread.
>
> Good idea, yes. You should evaluate the Refactoring Browser  
> (Refactoring Engine). I just hacked it a little so that Tratis are  
> treated like classes. This
> is for sure not what is needed... it should be extended to know  
> about  Traits and then we need support for "refactoring towards"  
> traits.
>
> Should be a nice topic.
>
>     Marcus
>
>
>

> Hello everybody!
>
> I'm starting a research on refactorings & traits as part of a project
> ( that luckily :-) could end as my thesis ).
> Since I'm a newbie, my fist step is this email.
> The idea and scope are not closed yet but at a first glance the idea
> is to add refatoring tools to Squeak for traits, but this original
> idea may slightly change since it is being defined as I get knowledge
> about the topic.
> Every paper, link, idea, resource, suggestion about this topic will be
> happily welcomed.
> For sure, as soon as I make some progress, I'll share the results with
> any interested on this thread.
>
> Thanks in advance
> Alejandro
>
>

> Hello everybody!
>
> I'm starting a research on refactorings & traits as part of a  
> project ( that luckily :-) could end as my thesis ).
> Since I'm a newbie, my fist step is this email.
> The idea and scope are not closed yet but at a first glance the  
> idea is to add refatoring tools to Squeak for traits, but this  
> original idea may slightly change since it is being defined as I  
> get knowledge about the topic.
> Every paper, link, idea, resource, suggestion about this topic will  
> be happily welcomed.
> For sure, as soon as I make some progress, I'll share the results  
> with any interested on this thread.
>
> Thanks in advance
> Alejandro
>
>

> Hi Alejandro,
>
> This is a paper on a semi-automatic approach for identifying Traits  
> based on formal concept analysis:
>
> Adrian Lienhard, Stéphane Ducasse and Gabriela Arévalo, “Identifying  
> Traits with Formal Concept Analysis,” Proceedings of ASE '05 (20th  
> Conference on Automated Software Engineering), IEEE Computer Society  
> Press, November 2005, pp. 66-75.
> http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~scg/Archive/Papers/Lien05aIdentifyingTraits.pdf

> Adrian
>
> ___________________
> Adrian Lienhard
> www.adrian-lienhard.ch
>
>
> On Oct 2, 2006, at 12:55 , Alejandro Gonzalez wrote:
>
>> Hello everybody!
>>
>> I'm starting a research on refactorings & traits as part of a project  
>> ( that luckily :-) could end as my thesis ).
>> Since I'm a newbie, my fist step is this email.
>> The idea and scope are not closed yet but at a first glance the idea is  
>> to add refatoring tools to Squeak for traits, but this original idea  
>> may slightly change since it is being defined as I get knowledge about  
>> the topic.
>> Every paper, link, idea, resource, suggestion about this topic will be  
>> happily welcomed.
>> For sure, as soon as I make some progress, I'll share the results with  
>> any interested on this thread.
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>> Alejandro
>>
>>
>
>
>

> On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 16:29:16 +0200, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
>> Hi Alejandro,
>>
>> This is a paper on a semi-automatic approach for identifying  
>> Traits based on formal concept analysis:
>>
>> Adrian Lienhard, Stéphane Ducasse and Gabriela Arévalo,  
>> “Identifying Traits with Formal Concept Analysis,” Proceedings of  
>> ASE '05 (20th Conference on Automated Software Engineering), IEEE  
>> Computer Society Press, November 2005, pp. 66-75.
>> http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~scg/Archive/Papers/ 
>> Lien05aIdentifyingTraits.pdf
>
> Interesting piece of work, especially in comparision to manual  
> refactorings.
>
>> If you have any questions, let me know.
>
> Is the algorithm which computes the concept lattice written in  
> Smalltalk, and if so, can I have the source code.

>
> /Klaus
>
>> Adrian
>>
>> ___________________
>> Adrian Lienhard
>> www.adrian-lienhard.ch
>>
>>
>> On Oct 2, 2006, at 12:55 , Alejandro Gonzalez wrote:
>>
>>> Hello everybody!
>>>
>>> I'm starting a research on refactorings & traits as part of a  
>>> project ( that luckily :-) could end as my thesis ).
>>> Since I'm a newbie, my fist step is this email.
>>> The idea and scope are not closed yet but at a first glance the  
>>> idea is to add refatoring tools to Squeak for traits, but this  
>>> original idea may slightly change since it is being defined as I  
>>> get knowledge about the topic.
>>> Every paper, link, idea, resource, suggestion about this topic  
>>> will be happily welcomed.
>>> For sure, as soon as I make some progress, I'll share the results  
>>> with any interested on this thread.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance
>>> Alejandro
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>