On 22.04.2010, at 16:34, Stéphane Rollandin wrote:
>
>> Yes, MIT is compulsory for 4.1.
>
> Well, for inclusion only, so I don't think it matters for the Prolog package.
It doesn't. But the license text needs to change in general from
"SqueakL - The license of Squeak from Apple. The only license we allow for inclusion in base Squeak."
to something like
"SqueakL - The original license of Squeak from Apple. Obsolete since Squeak 4.0 (which only accepts MIT contributions). SqueakL is not recommended to be used for new projects."
On 2010/04/22 16:34, Stéphane Rollandin wrote:
>> Yes, MIT is compulsory for 4.1.
>
> Well, for inclusion only, so I don't think it matters for the Prolog
> package.
>
> (I'm currently co-maintainer of Prolog, but since I did not write all of
> it I can't change the licence anyway)
Indeed, I meant only to address the association of SqueakL with
image-inclusion, not to imply that the Prolog package should be MIT.