Hello,
I set up a web page for my Space Invader: http://www.zogotounga.net/comp/saucers.htm Now, some of my friends on Mac (but not all) complain that the all-in-one available via the "for Mac" link is broken and does not install. On the other hand I saw it install perfectly on a Mac laptop; it does work for some. I don't know s*** about Macs. Could someone solve that case for me ? What I did is take the official 4.5 all-in-one, and simply replace the 4.5 image with mine (renamed, obviously). Stef |
it depends on your mac security settings.
if you have them at „mac app store“ or „mac app store and verified developers“, then the mac complains that the app is broken and wants to move it to the trash. if you have them at „no limitations“ the mac complains that it has been downloaded from the internet, but you can start and run it (and it works). kind regards wolfgang Am 07.10.2014 um 10:37 schrieb Stéphane Rollandin <[hidden email]>: > Hello, > > I set up a web page for my Space Invader: > http://www.zogotounga.net/comp/saucers.htm > > Now, some of my friends on Mac (but not all) complain that the all-in-one available via the "for Mac" link is broken and does not install. > > On the other hand I saw it install perfectly on a Mac laptop; it does work for some. > > I don't know s*** about Macs. Could someone solve that case for me ? > > What I did is take the official 4.5 all-in-one, and simply replace the 4.5 image with mine (renamed, obviously). > > > Stef > |
In reply to this post by Stéphane Rollandin
I try it on my macs, (have severals) and works I wish the source code for including in FunSqueak4.6 :=)
On Tuesday, October 7, 2014 at 05:37, Stéphane Rollandin wrote:
|
In reply to this post by Stéphane Rollandin
On 07.10.2014, at 10:37, Stéphane Rollandin <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hello, > > I set up a web page for my Space Invader: > http://www.zogotounga.net/comp/saucers.htm > > Now, some of my friends on Mac (but not all) complain that the all-in-one available via the "for Mac" link is broken and does not install. > > On the other hand I saw it install perfectly on a Mac laptop; it does work for some. > > I don't know s*** about Macs. Could someone solve that case for me ? > > What I did is take the official 4.5 all-in-one, and simply replace the 4.5 image with mine (renamed, obviously). The 4.5 all-in-one is code-signed, so replacing the image will invalidate the signature, that's what OS X complains about. Best -Tobias |
In reply to this post by Wolfgang Eder
Le 07/10/2014 10:47, Wolfgang Eder a écrit :
> it depends on your mac security settings. > if you have them at „mac app store“ or „mac app store and verified developers“, > then the mac complains that the app is broken and wants to move it to the trash. > if you have them at „no limitations“ the mac complains that it has been downloaded > from the internet, but you can start and run it (and it works). > kind regards > wolfgang Ah, thanks. Stef |
In reply to this post by Tobias Pape
> The 4.5 all-in-one is code-signed, so replacing the image will invalidate the signature,
> that's what OS X complains about. So what is the correct way to create a all-in-one from a Windows system ? Stef |
In reply to this post by Edgar De Cleene
> I try it on my macs, (have severals) and works
> I wish the source code for including in FunSqueak4.6 :=) The image is hacked at a few critical points, so I cannot make it into a loadable package that would be a good citizen wrt other packages. It disable hibernation of Forms, for example. Stef |
In reply to this post by Stéphane Rollandin
Hoi Stef-- > ...what is the correct way to create a all-in-one from a Windows > system? There is good progress on porting the open-source Mac app signing code to non-Mac platforms, but it still needs some work. And apparently you can sign with non-Apple (e.g., free) certificates and still satisfy Gatekeeper on an end-user Mac, but I don't think it'd pass review for the Apple app store (although it probably would for the Microsoft store). See [1]. -C [1] http://bit.ly/1vOxWyI (stackoverflow.com) -- Craig Latta netjam.org +31 6 2757 7177 (SMS ok) + 1 415 287 3547 (no SMS) |
> There is good progress on porting the open-source Mac app signing
> code to non-Mac platforms, but it still needs some work. And apparently > you can sign with non-Apple (e.g., free) certificates and still satisfy > Gatekeeper on an end-user Mac, but I don't think it'd pass review for > the Apple app store (although it probably would for the Microsoft > store). See [1]. > > > -C > > [1] http://bit.ly/1vOxWyI (stackoverflow.com) Hmm.. I don't understand most of this stuff; I take it that it is not trivial to deploy a Squeak image on Macs... sad. Well, I'll tell my friends to change their security settings. Thanks, Stef |
> I take it that it is not trivial to deploy a Squeak image on Macs... > sad. I don't think it's ever been trivial to deploy any Smalltalk app on any platform, ever, and yes, that's sad. :) We're making progress though, even with the advent of walled-off "app stores" from Apple, Microsoft, Google, etc. As for your particular signing issue, I'm happy to sign it if you like. -C -- Craig Latta netjam.org +31 6 2757 7177 (SMS ok) + 1 415 287 3547 (no SMS) |
>
> As for your particular signing issue, I'm happy to sign it if you like. Thanks, but asking people to lower their security settings did the trick for me. Stef |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |