Smalltalk
› Squeak
› Other
›
Squeak - UI
Seaside and UI Enhancements??
Locked
Seaside and UI Enhancements??
 
|
Hello all,
Are any of you using Seaside with Gary's UI Enhancements? It seems like it should be ok, but if there are any tricks to getting everything installed, time-saving pointers would be appreciated. I am giving an introductory presentation on Smalltalk and Seaside (very basic stuff), and prefer to have the improved GUI if at all possible. Bill Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D. University of Florida Department of Anesthesiology PO Box 100254 Gainesville, FL 32610-0254 Email: [hidden email] Tel: (352) 846-1285 FAX: (352) 392-7029 _______________________________________________ UI mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui |
|
|
Hi Bill. Here at Pinesoft (where Gary works!) we're developing with Seaside in dev images (as in, Damien Cassou's dev images) with the UI enhancements enabled. I'm not sure what you mean by "with", do you just mean an image with the UI enhancements making it look pretty? If that's the case I'm not sure what issues there are, as afaicr Seaside and the UI enhancements are orthogonal. Cheers, Simon |
Re: Seaside and UI Enhancements??
|
|
I tested UIEnhancements with a stock 3.9 image. Unfortunately, the
package depends on Package Universes, which depends on YAXO. So its not straightforward to load, but its doable if you know how. It would be nice to have just one Monticello package without dependencies... Cheers, Adrian On Feb 17, 2008, at 21:00 , Simon Kirk wrote: > > > Bill Schwab wrote: >> >> Are any of you using Seaside with Gary's UI Enhancements? It seems >> like >> it should be ok, but if there are any tricks to getting everything >> installed, time-saving pointers would be appreciated. I am giving an >> introductory presentation on Smalltalk and Seaside (very basic >> stuff), >> and prefer to have the improved GUI if at all possible. >> > > Hi Bill. > > Here at Pinesoft (where Gary works!) we're developing with Seaside > in dev > images (as in, Damien Cassou's dev images) with the UI enhancements > enabled. > I'm not sure what you mean by "with", do you just mean an image with > the UI > enhancements making it look pretty? > > If that's the case I'm not sure what issues there are, as afaicr > Seaside and > the UI enhancements are orthogonal. > > Cheers, > Simon > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Seaside-and-UI-Enhancements---tp15529989p15532405.html > Sent from the Squeak - UI mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > UI mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui _______________________________________________ UI mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui |
Re: Seaside and UI Enhancements??
|
|
In reply to this post by Schwab,Wilhelm K
Adrian,
Agreed, though I have less objection to the multiple packages and more objection to the lack (my fault as much as anyone's) of a script that automagically gets the most recent versions of the packages required to load it. If you have some spare time, please take a look at http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/6005 and add anything you think might be missing. Bill Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D. University of Florida Department of Anesthesiology PO Box 100254 Gainesville, FL 32610-0254 Email: [hidden email] Tel: (352) 846-1285 FAX: (352) 392-7029 >>> [hidden email] 02/17/08 5:38 PM >>> I tested UIEnhancements with a stock 3.9 image. Unfortunately, the package depends on Package Universes, which depends on YAXO. So its not straightforward to load, but its doable if you know how. It would be nice to have just one Monticello package without dependencies... Cheers, Adrian On Feb 17, 2008, at 21:00 , Simon Kirk wrote: > > > Bill Schwab wrote: >> >> Are any of you using Seaside with Gary's UI Enhancements? It seems >> like >> it should be ok, but if there are any tricks to getting everything >> installed, time-saving pointers would be appreciated. I am giving an >> introductory presentation on Smalltalk and Seaside (very basic >> stuff), >> and prefer to have the improved GUI if at all possible. >> > > Hi Bill. > > Here at Pinesoft (where Gary works!) we're developing with Seaside > in dev > images (as in, Damien Cassou's dev images) with the UI enhancements > enabled. > I'm not sure what you mean by "with", do you just mean an image with > the UI > enhancements making it look pretty? > > If that's the case I'm not sure what issues there are, as afaicr > Seaside and > the UI enhancements are orthogonal. > > Cheers, > Simon > -- > View this message in context: > Sent from the Squeak - UI mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > UI mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui _______________________________________________ UI mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui _______________________________________________ UI mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui |
Re: Seaside and UI Enhancements??
|
|
In reply to this post by Schwab,Wilhelm K
Simon,
By "with" I indeed meant just making it look nice, not to mention have an improved feel. I thought they would be orthogonal, but it is great to know that you have run the configuration for a while. You guys are doing great work, and I fully intend to put it on display. Thanks!! Bill Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D. University of Florida Department of Anesthesiology PO Box 100254 Gainesville, FL 32610-0254 Email: [hidden email] Tel: (352) 846-1285 FAX: (352) 392-7029 >>> [hidden email] 02/17/08 3:00 PM >>> Bill Schwab wrote: > > Are any of you using Seaside with Gary's UI Enhancements? It seems like > it should be ok, but if there are any tricks to getting everything > installed, time-saving pointers would be appreciated. I am giving an > introductory presentation on Smalltalk and Seaside (very basic stuff), > and prefer to have the improved GUI if at all possible. > Hi Bill. Here at Pinesoft (where Gary works!) we're developing with Seaside in dev images (as in, Damien Cassou's dev images) with the UI enhancements enabled. I'm not sure what you mean by "with", do you just mean an image with the UI enhancements making it look pretty? If that's the case I'm not sure what issues there are, as afaicr Seaside and the UI enhancements are orthogonal. Cheers, Simon -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Seaside-and-UI-Enhancements---tp15529989p15532405.html Sent from the Squeak - UI mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ UI mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui _______________________________________________ UI mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui |
Re: Seaside and UI Enhancements??
|
|
In reply to this post by Adrian Lienhard
Hi Adrian,
why don't you simply install Universe (available on both SqueakMap and SqueakSource) and then, from Universe, install UIEnhancements? You can also download a squeak-dev image based on 3.9 (without UIEnhancements) and install UIEnhancements from Universe? On Feb 17, 2008 11:38 PM, Adrian Lienhard <[hidden email]> wrote: > I tested UIEnhancements with a stock 3.9 image. Unfortunately, the > package depends on Package Universes, which depends on YAXO. So its > not straightforward to load, but its doable if you know how. It would > be nice to have just one Monticello package without dependencies... > > Cheers, > Adrian > > > > On Feb 17, 2008, at 21:00 , Simon Kirk wrote: > > >> > > > Bill Schwab wrote: > >> > >> Are any of you using Seaside with Gary's UI Enhancements? It seems > >> like > >> it should be ok, but if there are any tricks to getting everything > >> installed, time-saving pointers would be appreciated. I am giving an > >> introductory presentation on Smalltalk and Seaside (very basic > >> stuff), > >> and prefer to have the improved GUI if at all possible. > >> > > > > Hi Bill. > > > > Here at Pinesoft (where Gary works!) we're developing with Seaside > > in dev > > images (as in, Damien Cassou's dev images) with the UI enhancements > > enabled. > > I'm not sure what you mean by "with", do you just mean an image with > > the UI > > enhancements making it look pretty? > > > > If that's the case I'm not sure what issues there are, as afaicr > > Seaside and > > the UI enhancements are orthogonal. > > > > Cheers, > > Simon > > -- > > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Seaside-and-UI-Enhancements---tp15529989p15532405.html > > Sent from the Squeak - UI mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > UI mailing list > > [hidden email] > > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui > > _______________________________________________ > UI mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui > -- Damien Cassou _______________________________________________ UI mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui |
Re: Seaside and UI Enhancements??
|
|
In reply to this post by Schwab,Wilhelm K
Hi Bill,
On Feb 17, 2008 3:02 PM, Bill Schwab <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hello all, > > Are any of you using Seaside with Gary's UI Enhancements? It seems like > it should be ok, but if there are any tricks to getting everything > installed, time-saving pointers would be appreciated. I am giving an > introductory presentation on Smalltalk and Seaside (very basic stuff), > and prefer to have the improved GUI if at all possible. You can use the squeak-web beta images (ftp://ftp.ofset.org/squeak/squeak-web/beta) which contain both Seaside and UIEnhancements. -- Damien Cassou _______________________________________________ UI mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui |
Re: Seaside and UI Enhancements??
|
|
In reply to this post by Damien Cassou-3
Hi Damien,
The reason is that I want to add this enhancement to our automated build process. Compared to production images, dev images have some additional packages. But I only want to add what we really need, e.g., OmniBrowser, Shout, eCompletion but not Package Universes or YAXO. Also, I want to have everything in MC packages as the build process is based on MC configurations. Adrian On Feb 18, 2008, at 08:00 , Damien Cassou wrote: > Hi Adrian, > > why don't you simply install Universe (available on both SqueakMap and > SqueakSource) and then, from Universe, install UIEnhancements? You > can also download a squeak-dev image based on 3.9 (without > UIEnhancements) and install UIEnhancements from Universe? > > On Feb 17, 2008 11:38 PM, Adrian Lienhard <[hidden email]> wrote: >> I tested UIEnhancements with a stock 3.9 image. Unfortunately, the >> package depends on Package Universes, which depends on YAXO. So its >> not straightforward to load, but its doable if you know how. It would >> be nice to have just one Monticello package without dependencies... >> >> Cheers, >> Adrian >> >> >> >> On Feb 17, 2008, at 21:00 , Simon Kirk wrote: >> >>>>> >>> Bill Schwab wrote: >>>> >>>> Are any of you using Seaside with Gary's UI Enhancements? It seems >>>> like >>>> it should be ok, but if there are any tricks to getting everything >>>> installed, time-saving pointers would be appreciated. I am >>>> giving an >>>> introductory presentation on Smalltalk and Seaside (very basic >>>> stuff), >>>> and prefer to have the improved GUI if at all possible. >>>> >>> >>> Hi Bill. >>> >>> Here at Pinesoft (where Gary works!) we're developing with Seaside >>> in dev >>> images (as in, Damien Cassou's dev images) with the UI enhancements >>> enabled. >>> I'm not sure what you mean by "with", do you just mean an image with >>> the UI >>> enhancements making it look pretty? >>> >>> If that's the case I'm not sure what issues there are, as afaicr >>> Seaside and >>> the UI enhancements are orthogonal. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Simon >>> -- >>> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Seaside-and-UI-Enhancements---tp15529989p15532405.html >>> Sent from the Squeak - UI mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> UI mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui >> >> _______________________________________________ >> UI mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui >> > > > > -- > Damien Cassou > _______________________________________________ > UI mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui _______________________________________________ UI mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui |
RE: Seaside and UI Enhancements??
|
|
In reply to this post by Adrian Lienhard
As I think I have previously mentioned (maybe on the dev list), the
Universes dependency is merely to support an icon for the Universe browser and is safe to "proceed" when loading. As for Seaside, as Simon said, the UI Enhancements should have no impact on Seaside functionality. Gary > -----Original Message----- > From: [hidden email] > [mailto:[hidden email]]On Behalf Of Adrian > Lienhard > Sent: 17 February 2008 10:39 PM > To: Squeak's User Interface > Subject: Re: [UI] Seaside and UI Enhancements?? > > > I tested UIEnhancements with a stock 3.9 image. Unfortunately, the > package depends on Package Universes, which depends on YAXO. So its > not straightforward to load, but its doable if you know how. It would > be nice to have just one Monticello package without dependencies... > > Cheers, > Adrian > > > On Feb 17, 2008, at 21:00 , Simon Kirk wrote: > > > > > > > Bill Schwab wrote: > >> > >> Are any of you using Seaside with Gary's UI Enhancements? It seems > >> like > >> it should be ok, but if there are any tricks to getting everything > >> installed, time-saving pointers would be appreciated. I am giving an > >> introductory presentation on Smalltalk and Seaside (very basic > >> stuff), > >> and prefer to have the improved GUI if at all possible. > >> > > > > Hi Bill. > > > > Here at Pinesoft (where Gary works!) we're developing with Seaside > > in dev > > images (as in, Damien Cassou's dev images) with the UI enhancements > > enabled. > > I'm not sure what you mean by "with", do you just mean an image with > > the UI > > enhancements making it look pretty? > > > > If that's the case I'm not sure what issues there are, as afaicr > > Seaside and > > the UI enhancements are orthogonal. > > > > Cheers, > > Simon > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Seaside-and-UI-Enhancements---tp15529989p155 > Sent from the Squeak - UI mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > UI mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui _______________________________________________ UI mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui _______________________________________________ UI mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui |
RE: Seaside and UI Enhancements??
|
|
In reply to this post by Adrian Lienhard
If there is sufficient interest I could break out the window icon methods
into a separate package (with the implicit dependencies). Gary > -----Original Message----- > From: [hidden email] > [mailto:[hidden email]]On Behalf Of Adrian > Lienhard > Sent: 18 February 2008 8:19 AM > To: Squeak's User Interface > Subject: Re: [UI] Seaside and UI Enhancements?? > > > Hi Damien, > > The reason is that I want to add this enhancement to our automated > build process. Compared to production images, dev images have some > additional packages. But I only want to add what we really need, e.g., > OmniBrowser, Shout, eCompletion but not Package Universes or YAXO. > Also, I want to have everything in MC packages as the build process is > based on MC configurations. > > Adrian > > > On Feb 18, 2008, at 08:00 , Damien Cassou wrote: > > > Hi Adrian, > > > > why don't you simply install Universe (available on both SqueakMap and > > SqueakSource) and then, from Universe, install UIEnhancements? You > > can also download a squeak-dev image based on 3.9 (without > > UIEnhancements) and install UIEnhancements from Universe? > > > > On Feb 17, 2008 11:38 PM, Adrian Lienhard <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> I tested UIEnhancements with a stock 3.9 image. Unfortunately, the > >> package depends on Package Universes, which depends on YAXO. So its > >> not straightforward to load, but its doable if you know how. It would > >> be nice to have just one Monticello package without dependencies... > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Adrian > >> > >> > >> > >> On Feb 17, 2008, at 21:00 , Simon Kirk wrote: > >> > >>>>> > >>> Bill Schwab wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Are any of you using Seaside with Gary's UI Enhancements? It seems > >>>> like > >>>> it should be ok, but if there are any tricks to getting everything > >>>> installed, time-saving pointers would be appreciated. I am > >>>> giving an > >>>> introductory presentation on Smalltalk and Seaside (very basic > >>>> stuff), > >>>> and prefer to have the improved GUI if at all possible. > >>>> > >>> > >>> Hi Bill. > >>> > >>> Here at Pinesoft (where Gary works!) we're developing with Seaside > >>> in dev > >>> images (as in, Damien Cassou's dev images) with the UI enhancements > >>> enabled. > >>> I'm not sure what you mean by "with", do you just mean an image with > >>> the UI > >>> enhancements making it look pretty? > >>> > >>> If that's the case I'm not sure what issues there are, as afaicr > >>> Seaside and > >>> the UI enhancements are orthogonal. > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Simon > >>> -- > >>> View this message in context: >>> Sent from the Squeak - UI mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> UI mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui >> >> _______________________________________________ >> UI mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui >> > > > > -- > Damien Cassou > _______________________________________________ > UI mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui _______________________________________________ UI mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui _______________________________________________ UI mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui |
Re: Seaside and UI Enhancements??
|
|
Hi Gary,
That would be great. Since I would use the package in an automated build process, to "proceed" when loading does not work. But I think it would also be good for other people that just want to try out UIEnhancements because it simplifies the installation (at least for those not having installed Package Universes). Cheers, Adrian On Feb 18, 2008, at 11:00 , Gary Chambers wrote: > If there is sufficient interest I could break out the window icon > methods > into a separate package (with the implicit dependencies). > > Gary > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [hidden email] >> [mailto:[hidden email]]On Behalf Of Adrian >> Lienhard >> Sent: 18 February 2008 8:19 AM >> To: Squeak's User Interface >> Subject: Re: [UI] Seaside and UI Enhancements?? >> >> >> Hi Damien, >> >> The reason is that I want to add this enhancement to our automated >> build process. Compared to production images, dev images have some >> additional packages. But I only want to add what we really need, >> e.g., >> OmniBrowser, Shout, eCompletion but not Package Universes or YAXO. >> Also, I want to have everything in MC packages as the build process >> is >> based on MC configurations. >> >> Adrian >> >> >> On Feb 18, 2008, at 08:00 , Damien Cassou wrote: >> >>> Hi Adrian, >>> >>> why don't you simply install Universe (available on both SqueakMap >>> and >>> SqueakSource) and then, from Universe, install UIEnhancements? You >>> can also download a squeak-dev image based on 3.9 (without >>> UIEnhancements) and install UIEnhancements from Universe? >>> >>> On Feb 17, 2008 11:38 PM, Adrian Lienhard <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> I tested UIEnhancements with a stock 3.9 image. Unfortunately, the >>>> package depends on Package Universes, which depends on YAXO. So its >>>> not straightforward to load, but its doable if you know how. It >>>> would >>>> be nice to have just one Monticello package without dependencies... >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Adrian >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Feb 17, 2008, at 21:00 , Simon Kirk wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> Bill Schwab wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Are any of you using Seaside with Gary's UI Enhancements? It >>>>>> seems >>>>>> like >>>>>> it should be ok, but if there are any tricks to getting >>>>>> everything >>>>>> installed, time-saving pointers would be appreciated. I am >>>>>> giving an >>>>>> introductory presentation on Smalltalk and Seaside (very basic >>>>>> stuff), >>>>>> and prefer to have the improved GUI if at all possible. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Bill. >>>>> >>>>> Here at Pinesoft (where Gary works!) we're developing with Seaside >>>>> in dev >>>>> images (as in, Damien Cassou's dev images) with the UI >>>>> enhancements >>>>> enabled. >>>>> I'm not sure what you mean by "with", do you just mean an image >>>>> with >>>>> the UI >>>>> enhancements making it look pretty? >>>>> >>>>> If that's the case I'm not sure what issues there are, as afaicr >>>>> Seaside and >>>>> the UI enhancements are orthogonal. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Simon >>>>> -- >>>>> View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Seaside-and-UI-Enhancements---tp15529989p15532405.html >>>> Sent from the Squeak - UI mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> UI mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> UI mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Damien Cassou >> _______________________________________________ >> UI mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui > > _______________________________________________ > UI mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui > > _______________________________________________ > UI mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui _______________________________________________ UI mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui |
Re: Seaside and UI Enhancements??
|
|
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:14:32 +0100, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
> Hi Gary, > > That would be great. > > Since I would use the package in an automated build process, to > "proceed" when loading does not work. Have you condidered #valueSupplyingAnswers: which is used in Keith's Installer package for doing such things. > But I think it would also be good for other people that just want to try > out UIEnhancements because it simplifies the installation (at least for > those not having installed Package Universes). Yes, more independence would be appreciated. /Klaus > Cheers, > Adrian > > > On Feb 18, 2008, at 11:00 , Gary Chambers wrote: > >> If there is sufficient interest I could break out the window icon >> methods >> into a separate package (with the implicit dependencies). >> >> Gary >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [hidden email] >>> [mailto:[hidden email]]On Behalf Of Adrian >>> Lienhard >>> Sent: 18 February 2008 8:19 AM >>> To: Squeak's User Interface >>> Subject: Re: [UI] Seaside and UI Enhancements?? >>> >>> >>> Hi Damien, >>> >>> The reason is that I want to add this enhancement to our automated >>> build process. Compared to production images, dev images have some >>> additional packages. But I only want to add what we really need, e.g., >>> OmniBrowser, Shout, eCompletion but not Package Universes or YAXO. >>> Also, I want to have everything in MC packages as the build process is >>> based on MC configurations. >>> >>> Adrian >>> >>> >>> On Feb 18, 2008, at 08:00 , Damien Cassou wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Adrian, >>>> >>>> why don't you simply install Universe (available on both SqueakMap and >>>> SqueakSource) and then, from Universe, install UIEnhancements? You >>>> can also download a squeak-dev image based on 3.9 (without >>>> UIEnhancements) and install UIEnhancements from Universe? >>>> >>>> On Feb 17, 2008 11:38 PM, Adrian Lienhard <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>> I tested UIEnhancements with a stock 3.9 image. Unfortunately, the >>>>> package depends on Package Universes, which depends on YAXO. So its >>>>> not straightforward to load, but its doable if you know how. It would >>>>> be nice to have just one Monticello package without dependencies... >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Adrian >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Feb 17, 2008, at 21:00 , Simon Kirk wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> Bill Schwab wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Are any of you using Seaside with Gary's UI Enhancements? It seems >>>>>>> like >>>>>>> it should be ok, but if there are any tricks to getting everything >>>>>>> installed, time-saving pointers would be appreciated. I am >>>>>>> giving an >>>>>>> introductory presentation on Smalltalk and Seaside (very basic >>>>>>> stuff), >>>>>>> and prefer to have the improved GUI if at all possible. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Bill. >>>>>> >>>>>> Here at Pinesoft (where Gary works!) we're developing with Seaside >>>>>> in dev >>>>>> images (as in, Damien Cassou's dev images) with the UI enhancements >>>>>> enabled. >>>>>> I'm not sure what you mean by "with", do you just mean an image with >>>>>> the UI >>>>>> enhancements making it look pretty? >>>>>> >>>>>> If that's the case I'm not sure what issues there are, as afaicr >>>>>> Seaside and >>>>>> the UI enhancements are orthogonal. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Simon >>>>>> -- >>>>>> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Seaside-and-UI-Enhancements---tp15529989p15532405.html >>>>> Sent from the Squeak - UI mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> UI mailing list >>>>> [hidden email] >>>>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> UI mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Damien Cassou >>> _______________________________________________ >>> UI mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui >> >> _______________________________________________ >> UI mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui >> >> _______________________________________________ >> UI mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui _______________________________________________ UI mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui |
RE: Re: Seaside and UI Enhancements??
|
|
> Yes, more independence would be appreciated.
Done. On SqueakSource Pinesoft-Widgets-gvc.289 has the class-side taskbarIcon methods for windows/models not contained in the widgets package removed. Load Pinesoft-TaskbarIcons-gvc.1 to load them (depends on Universes, of course ;-) ). I have not updated the dev Universe at present, since not a load problem if Universe is installed, though probably due a new release soon. Gary. _______________________________________________ UI mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui |
Re: Seaside and UI Enhancements??
|
|
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:12:26 +0100, Gary Chambers wrote:
>> Yes, more independence would be appreciated. > > Done. On SqueakSource Pinesoft-Widgets-gvc.289 has the class-side > taskbarIcon methods for windows/models not contained in the widgets > package > removed. Load Pinesoft-TaskbarIcons-gvc.1 to load them (depends on > Universes, of course ;-) ). Loaded -gcv.1 and merged -gvc.289 into Damien's sq3.10-7159dev08.02.1.image and it works just fine :) Thank you Gary. /Klaus > I have not updated the dev Universe at present, since not a load problem > if > Universe is installed, though probably due a new release soon. > > Gary. _______________________________________________ UI mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui |
RE: Seaside and UI Enhancements??
|
|
In reply to this post by Schwab,Wilhelm K
Hope your presentation goes well!
Gary > > By "with" I indeed meant just making it look nice, not to mention have > an improved feel. I thought they would be orthogonal, but it is great > to know that you have run the configuration for a while. You guys are > doing great work, and I fully intend to put it on display. Thanks!! > > Bill > > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui _______________________________________________ UI mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui |
Re: Seaside and UI Enhancements??
|
|
In reply to this post by Adrian Lienhard
Check out LevelPlayingField, which I think makes getting Universes
straightforward (even automatable) back as far as 3.7 On Feb 18, 2008 4:14 AM, Adrian Lienhard <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi Gary, > > That would be great. > > Since I would use the package in an automated build process, to > "proceed" when loading does not work. But I think it would also be > good for other people that just want to try out UIEnhancements because > it simplifies the installation (at least for those not having > installed Package Universes). > > Cheers, > Adrian > > > > On Feb 18, 2008, at 11:00 , Gary Chambers wrote: > > > If there is sufficient interest I could break out the window icon > > methods > > into a separate package (with the implicit dependencies). > > > > Gary > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [hidden email] > >> [mailto:[hidden email]]On Behalf Of Adrian > >> Lienhard > >> Sent: 18 February 2008 8:19 AM > >> To: Squeak's User Interface > >> Subject: Re: [UI] Seaside and UI Enhancements?? > >> > >> > >> Hi Damien, > >> > >> The reason is that I want to add this enhancement to our automated > >> build process. Compared to production images, dev images have some > >> additional packages. But I only want to add what we really need, > >> e.g., > >> OmniBrowser, Shout, eCompletion but not Package Universes or YAXO. > >> Also, I want to have everything in MC packages as the build process > >> is > >> based on MC configurations. > >> > >> Adrian > >> > >> > >> On Feb 18, 2008, at 08:00 , Damien Cassou wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Adrian, > >>> > >>> why don't you simply install Universe (available on both SqueakMap > >>> and > >>> SqueakSource) and then, from Universe, install UIEnhancements? You > >>> can also download a squeak-dev image based on 3.9 (without > >>> UIEnhancements) and install UIEnhancements from Universe? > >>> > >>> On Feb 17, 2008 11:38 PM, Adrian Lienhard <[hidden email]> wrote: > >>>> I tested UIEnhancements with a stock 3.9 image. Unfortunately, the > >>>> package depends on Package Universes, which depends on YAXO. So its > >>>> not straightforward to load, but its doable if you know how. It > >>>> would > >>>> be nice to have just one Monticello package without dependencies... > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> Adrian > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Feb 17, 2008, at 21:00 , Simon Kirk wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> Bill Schwab wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Are any of you using Seaside with Gary's UI Enhancements? It > >>>>>> seems > >>>>>> like > >>>>>> it should be ok, but if there are any tricks to getting > >>>>>> everything > >>>>>> installed, time-saving pointers would be appreciated. I am > >>>>>> giving an > >>>>>> introductory presentation on Smalltalk and Seaside (very basic > >>>>>> stuff), > >>>>>> and prefer to have the improved GUI if at all possible. > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi Bill. > >>>>> > >>>>> Here at Pinesoft (where Gary works!) we're developing with Seaside > >>>>> in dev > >>>>> images (as in, Damien Cassou's dev images) with the UI > >>>>> enhancements > >>>>> enabled. > >>>>> I'm not sure what you mean by "with", do you just mean an image > >>>>> with > >>>>> the UI > >>>>> enhancements making it look pretty? > >>>>> > >>>>> If that's the case I'm not sure what issues there are, as afaicr > >>>>> Seaside and > >>>>> the UI enhancements are orthogonal. > >>>>> > >>>>> Cheers, > >>>>> Simon > >>>>> -- > >>>>> View this message in context: > > http://www.nabble.com/Seaside-and-UI-Enhancements---tp15529989p15532405.html > >>>> Sent from the Squeak - UI mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> UI mailing list > >>>> [hidden email] > >>>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> UI mailing list > >>> [hidden email] > >>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Damien Cassou > >> _______________________________________________ > >> UI mailing list > >> [hidden email] > >> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui > > > > _______________________________________________ > > UI mailing list > > [hidden email] > > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui > > > > _______________________________________________ > > UI mailing list > > [hidden email] > > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui > > _______________________________________________ > UI mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui > UI mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui |
RE: Seaside and UI Enhancements??
|
|
> > Check out LevelPlayingField, which I think makes getting Universes > straightforward (even automatable) back as far as 3.7 > I think Adrian was looking not to have to load Universes... > The reason is that I want to add this enhancement to our automated > build process. Compared to production images, dev images have some > additional packages. But I only want to add what we really need, e.g., > OmniBrowser, Shout, eCompletion but not Package Universes or YAXO. > Also, I want to have everything in MC packages as the build process is > based on MC configurations. _______________________________________________ UI mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui |
«
Return to Squeak - UI
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |