Seaside3.2 on Squeak5.1 is working well.

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Seaside3.2 on Squeak5.1 is working well.

Tobias Pape
Hi all

I just want to report that Seaside3.2 works well on Squeak5.1 with 1422 passing tests. [1]
Thanks for everyone developing Seaside and/or Squeak for taking care!

Yay!

Best regards
        -Tobias

[1]: There's only one Test error because "'Seaside-Pharo-Continuation' depends on unknown package 'Grease-Pharo-Core'" which is obviously not loaded on Squeak, but gladly that does not hamper functionality.



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Seaside3.2 on Squeak5.1 is working well.

David T. Lewis
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:05:33PM +0200, Tobias Pape wrote:

> Hi all
>
> I just want to report that Seaside3.2 works well on Squeak5.1 with 1422 passing tests. [1]
> Thanks for everyone developing Seaside and/or Squeak for taking care!
>
> Yay!
>
> Best regards
> -Tobias
>
> [1]: There's only one Test error because "'Seaside-Pharo-Continuation' depends on unknown package 'Grease-Pharo-Core'" which is obviously not loaded on Squeak, but gladly that does not hamper functionality.
>
>

Excellent! Thanks for the update.

Dave
 

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Seaside3.2 on Squeak5.1 is working well.

Hannes Hirzel
Tobias and others

A question: which method should be used to load Seaside?

-- Hannes

On 9/24/16, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:05:33PM +0200, Tobias Pape wrote:
>> Hi all
>>
>> I just want to report that Seaside3.2 works well on Squeak5.1 with 1422
>> passing tests. [1]
>> Thanks for everyone developing Seaside and/or Squeak for taking care!
>>
>> Yay!
>>
>> Best regards
>> -Tobias
>>
>> [1]: There's only one Test error because "'Seaside-Pharo-Continuation'
>> depends on unknown package 'Grease-Pharo-Core'" which is obviously not
>> loaded on Squeak, but gladly that does not hamper functionality.
>>
>>
>
> Excellent! Thanks for the update.
>
> Dave
>
>
>