|
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 02:15:39 +0200, Zulq Alam wrote:
...
> Oh, and isn't there something wrong with:
>
> Behavior>>new
> ^ self basicNew initialize
>
> Shouldn't it have a yourself? Otherwise it relies on initialize
> answering with self and it would seem often the implicit self.
Try this: YourClass>>initialize ^nil
> Perhaps this is intended for some reason?
Yes, Behavior doesn't want to take over the responsibility for what is
returned by your #initialize method, so it passes garbage-in garbage-out.
If in need, you can always ask for (YourClass basicNew initialize;
yourself).
/Klaus
> Thanks,
> Zulq.
>
>
>
>
>
>
|