Smalltalk Reloaded Was:Re: Removing Etoys (was Re: A process proposal for 3.10)

One note about Scratch... I think an older version of Squeak is being  
used- something in the 2.x world of things. I know this because, for  
some reason, 2.x images don't work quite right on my OS X VM  
(3.8.12beta4U). The mouse events are transposed 20 pixels below where  
my actual pointer is in all my 2.x images... and so in Scratch as  well.

Not that this first-class sleuthing, but it struck me as interesting  
that they were using a 2.x version of Squeak for Scratch.

Regards,
Aaron

On Nov 9, 2006, at 17:49 , Aaron Reichow wrote:

> One note about Scratch... I think an older version of Squeak is  
> being used- something in the 2.x world of things. I know this  
> because, for some reason, 2.x images don't work quite right on my  
> OS X VM (3.8.12beta4U). The mouse events are transposed 20 pixels  
> below where my actual pointer is in all my 2.x images... and so in  
> Scratch as  well.
>
> Not that this first-class sleuthing, but it struck me as  
> interesting that they were using a 2.x version of Squeak for Scratch.

IIRC they use 2.8. Might ask John what that bug is about ...

- Bert -

>>
>> Not that this first-class sleuthing, but it struck me as  
>> interesting that they were using a 2.x version of Squeak for Scratch.
>
> IIRC they use 2.8. Might ask John what that bug is about ...
>

It looks very much like a 2.8 image. But how can be sure?

Smalltalk aboutThisSystem is returnig 'MIT Squeak 0.9.4 (June 1, 2003)'

Cheers,
Francisco

On Nov 10, 2006, at 1:04 , Francisco Garau wrote:

>>>
>>> Not that this first-class sleuthing, but it struck me as  
>>> interesting that they were using a 2.x version of Squeak for  
>>> Scratch.
>> IIRC they use 2.8. Might ask John what that bug is about ...
>
> It looks very much like a 2.8 image. But how can be sure?

Ask John Maloney :)

- Bert -