Smalltalk fixObsoleteReferences

>
>
> El 9/10/13 10:18 PM, "Chris Muller" <[hidden email]> escribió:
>
>>I want to experiment with Smalltalk #shrink but the stock
>>Squeak4.5-12641.image has AnObsoleteBindingTest and... one other
>>ObsoleteClass stuck in the image.  Not even Smalltalk
>>fixObsoleteReferences can get rid of it.
>>
>>The reference is buried in Environment's 'exports' Dictionary.  I can
>>certainly remove it manually but how should we fix it in published
>>image?
>
>
> Yesterday I made the monthly update following trunk of my SqueakRosCore
> and notice we don't have Smalltalk unloadAllKnownPackages now
>
> My idea is
> unloadReloadablePackages
>  "Unload packages which can be reloaded."
>   #( 'ReleaseBuilder' 'ScriptLoader'
>   '311Deprecated' '39Deprecated'
>   'Universes' 'SMLoader' 'SMBase' 'Installer-Core'
>   'VersionNumberTests' 'VersionNumber'
>   'Services-Base' 'PreferenceBrowser' 'Nebraska'
>   'ToolBuilder-MVC' 'ST80'
>   'CollectionsTests' 'GraphicsTests' 'KernelTests'  'MorphicTests'
>   'MultilingualTests' 'NetworkTests' 'ToolsTests' 'TraitsTests'
>   'SystemChangeNotification-Tests' 'FlexibleVocabularies'
>   'EToys' 'Protocols' 'XML-Parser' 'Tests' 'SUnitGUI'
>   'Help-Squeak' 'HelpSystem' 'SystemReporter' 'GetText' 'Environments'
>  ) do: [:pkgName|
>    (MCPackage named: pkgName) unload.
>    MCMcmUpdater disableUpdatesOfPackage: pkgName.
>    ].
>  "Traits use custom unload"
>  self
>   at: #Trait
>   ifPresent: [ : aClass | aClass unloadTraits ]
>
>
> And we get rid of more packages.
>  Of course we must be careful of go back to previous version of methods
> concerningto Environments

> On 11 September 2013 11:21, Edgar J. De Cleene <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> El 9/10/13 10:18 PM, "Chris Muller" <[hidden email]> escribió:
>>
>>>I want to experiment with Smalltalk #shrink but the stock
>>>Squeak4.5-12641.image has AnObsoleteBindingTest and... one other
>>>ObsoleteClass stuck in the image.  Not even Smalltalk
>>>fixObsoleteReferences can get rid of it.
>>>
>>>The reference is buried in Environment's 'exports' Dictionary.  I can
>>>certainly remove it manually but how should we fix it in published
>>>image?
>>
>>
>> Yesterday I made the monthly update following trunk of my SqueakRosCore
>> and notice we don't have Smalltalk unloadAllKnownPackages now
>>
>> My idea is
>> unloadReloadablePackages
>>  "Unload packages which can be reloaded."
>>   #( 'ReleaseBuilder' 'ScriptLoader'
>>   '311Deprecated' '39Deprecated'
>>   'Universes' 'SMLoader' 'SMBase' 'Installer-Core'
>>   'VersionNumberTests' 'VersionNumber'
>>   'Services-Base' 'PreferenceBrowser' 'Nebraska'
>>   'ToolBuilder-MVC' 'ST80'
>>   'CollectionsTests' 'GraphicsTests' 'KernelTests'  'MorphicTests'
>>   'MultilingualTests' 'NetworkTests' 'ToolsTests' 'TraitsTests'
>>   'SystemChangeNotification-Tests' 'FlexibleVocabularies'
>>   'EToys' 'Protocols' 'XML-Parser' 'Tests' 'SUnitGUI'
>>   'Help-Squeak' 'HelpSystem' 'SystemReporter' 'GetText' 'Environments'
>>  ) do: [:pkgName|
>>    (MCPackage named: pkgName) unload.
>>    MCMcmUpdater disableUpdatesOfPackage: pkgName.
>>    ].
>>  "Traits use custom unload"
>>  self
>>   at: #Trait
>>   ifPresent: [ : aClass | aClass unloadTraits ]
>>
>>
>> And we get rid of more packages.
>>  Of course we must be careful of go back to previous version of methods
>> concerningto Environments
>
> Environments is a very low level package. It should be one of the
> least unloadable packages (because of its nature). For instance, you
> should need to remove 'Tools' before you can think of removing
> Environments, because Squeak 4.5 is all about Environments, and making
> the tools use them.
>
> frank
>

>
>
> El 9/10/13 10:18 PM, "Chris Muller" <[hidden email]> escribió:
>
>>I want to experiment with Smalltalk #shrink but the stock
>>Squeak4.5-12641.image has AnObsoleteBindingTest and... one other
>>ObsoleteClass stuck in the image.  Not even Smalltalk
>>fixObsoleteReferences can get rid of it.
>>
>>The reference is buried in Environment's 'exports' Dictionary.  I can
>>certainly remove it manually but how should we fix it in published
>>image?
>
>
> Yesterday I made the monthly update following trunk of my SqueakRosCore
> and notice we don't have Smalltalk unloadAllKnownPackages now
>
> My idea is
> unloadReloadablePackages
>  "Unload packages which can be reloaded."
>   #( 'ReleaseBuilder' 'ScriptLoader'
>   '311Deprecated' '39Deprecated'
>   'Universes' 'SMLoader' 'SMBase' 'Installer-Core'
>   'VersionNumberTests' 'VersionNumber'
>   'Services-Base' 'PreferenceBrowser' 'Nebraska'
>   'ToolBuilder-MVC' 'ST80'
>   'CollectionsTests' 'GraphicsTests' 'KernelTests'  'MorphicTests'
>   'MultilingualTests' 'NetworkTests' 'ToolsTests' 'TraitsTests'
>   'SystemChangeNotification-Tests' 'FlexibleVocabularies'
>   'EToys' 'Protocols' 'XML-Parser' 'Tests' 'SUnitGUI'
>   'Help-Squeak' 'HelpSystem' 'SystemReporter' 'GetText' 'Environments'
>  ) do: [:pkgName|
>    (MCPackage named: pkgName) unload.
>    MCMcmUpdater disableUpdatesOfPackage: pkgName.
>    ].
>  "Traits use custom unload"
>  self
>   at: #Trait
>   ifPresent: [ : aClass | aClass unloadTraits ]
>
>
> And we get rid of more packages.
>  Of course we must be careful of go back to previous version of methods
> concerningto Environments
>
>
>