When unpacked , the fles was named TrunkImage.xxx and not Squeak4.4-120303.xxx or similar name. Performing the all 3272 test with Croquet Cog 4.0.2585 http://www.mirandabanda.org '3272 run, 3227 passes, 18 expected failures, 17 failures, 10 errors, 0 unexpected passes' Failures LargeNegativeIntegerTest>>#testMinimumNegativeIntegerArithmetic LocaleTest>>#testLocaleChanged MCChangeNotificationTest>>#testCoreMethodModified MCFileInTest>>#testStWriter MCPackageTest>>#testUnload MCPatchTest>>#testPatchContents MCSnapshotBrowserTest>>#testNoSelection MCSnapshotTest>>#testCreation MCStWriterTest>>#testOrganizationDefinition MCWorkingCopyTest>>#testBackport MCWorkingCopyTest>>#testOptimizedLoad MCWorkingCopyTest>>#testRepeatedMerge MCWorkingCopyTest>>#testSelectiveBackport MCWorkingCopyTest>>#testSimpleMerge MCWorkingCopyTest>>#testSnapshotAndLoad SocketTest>>#testSocketReuse SocketTest>>#testUDP Errors MCChangeNotificationTest>>#testExtMethodModified MCSnapshotBrowserTest>>#testCategorySelected MCSnapshotBrowserTest>>#testClassSelected MCSnapshotBrowserTest>>#testClassSideClassSelected MCSnapshotBrowserTest>>#testComment MCSnapshotBrowserTest>>#testMethodIsCleared MCSnapshotBrowserTest>>#testMethodSelected MCSnapshotBrowserTest>>#testProtocolIsCleared MCSnapshotBrowserTest>>#testProtocolSelected MCStWriterTest>>#testInitializerDefinition In the Sunit test , some debuggers shows related with Sockets Added attached info is performing a script by Pavel, which shows the Unimplemented calls grows and grows. Two years ago was 206 . Jerome Peace put info about this in Mantis, but is old and can’t find it Edgar __info.txt (54K) Download Attachment |
Thanks for trying out the image, Edgar.
On 18 December 2012 11:12, Edgar J. De Cleene <[hidden email]> wrote: > First thing , this image only runs on CogVm. > When unpacked , the fles was named TrunkImage.xxx and not > Squeak4.4-120303.xxx or similar name. I've mentioned before that I _can't_ name the file with a proper version, because this image is currently _ahead_ of trunk. That will eventually change, of course. I'll definitely note renaming the files on my todo list. > Performing the all 3272 test with > Croquet Cog 4.0.2585 http://www.mirandabanda.org > > '3272 run, 3227 passes, 18 expected failures, 17 failures, 10 errors, 0 > unexpected passes' > > Failures > LargeNegativeIntegerTest>>#testMinimumNegativeIntegerArithmetic This is expected, and depends on the version of the VM you're running. > LocaleTest>>#testLocaleChanged > MCChangeNotificationTest>>#testCoreMethodModified > MCFileInTest>>#testStWriter > MCPackageTest>>#testUnload > MCPatchTest>>#testPatchContents > MCSnapshotBrowserTest>>#testNoSelection > MCSnapshotTest>>#testCreation > MCStWriterTest>>#testOrganizationDefinition > MCWorkingCopyTest>>#testBackport > MCWorkingCopyTest>>#testOptimizedLoad > MCWorkingCopyTest>>#testRepeatedMerge > MCWorkingCopyTest>>#testSelectiveBackport > MCWorkingCopyTest>>#testSimpleMerge > MCWorkingCopyTest>>#testSnapshotAndLoad > SocketTest>>#testSocketReuse > SocketTest>>#testUDP > > Errors > MCChangeNotificationTest>>#testExtMethodModified > MCSnapshotBrowserTest>>#testCategorySelected > MCSnapshotBrowserTest>>#testClassSelected > MCSnapshotBrowserTest>>#testClassSideClassSelected > MCSnapshotBrowserTest>>#testComment > MCSnapshotBrowserTest>>#testMethodIsCleared > MCSnapshotBrowserTest>>#testMethodSelected > MCSnapshotBrowserTest>>#testProtocolIsCleared > MCSnapshotBrowserTest>>#testProtocolSelected > MCStWriterTest>>#testInitializerDefinition When you ran these, did you set the author initials? Did you see FITBMs asking to set the author initials? > In the Sunit test , some debuggers shows related with Sockets Debuggers pop up during the test run? Or do you mean some Socket tests fail? (Some do.) > Added attached info is performing a script by Pavel, which shows the > Unimplemented calls grows and grows. > Two years ago was 206 . > Jerome Peace put info about this in Mantis, but is old and can’t find it I'll add this to the 4.5 list. frank > Edgar > > > |
On 12/18/12 8:36 AM, "Frank Shearar" <[hidden email]> wrote: > > When you ran these, did you set the author initials? Did you see > FITBMs asking to set the author initials? Not sure at which point ask initials > Debuggers pop up during the test run? Or do you mean some Socket tests > fail? (Some do.) Debugger por while the test run, the process do not stop Edgar |
On 18 December 2012 11:54, Edgar J. De Cleene <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > On 12/18/12 8:36 AM, "Frank Shearar" <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> >> When you ran these, did you set the author initials? Did you see >> FITBMs asking to set the author initials? > > > Not sure at which point ask initials I've noticed that if you don't have initials set, the MCMethodDefinitionTest >> testLoadAndUnload test prompts for initials during its teardown. If you don't put your initials in promptly (before the test times out), tests after that point will fail because MCMockClassA >> #one doesn't exist anymore. frank >> Debuggers pop up during the test run? Or do you mean some Socket tests >> fail? (Some do.) > > Debugger por while the test run, the process do not stop > > Edgar > > > |
In reply to this post by Frank Shearar-3
> I've mentioned before that I _can't_ name the file with a proper
> version, because this image is currently _ahead_ of trunk. That will > eventually change, of course. I'll definitely note renaming the files > on my todo list. I don't want to badger you but, why is it ahead of trunk? It seems like any patches that are good enough for the RC should be good enough for the trunk repository. I'm confused.. |
On 18 December 2012 16:04, Chris Muller <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> I've mentioned before that I _can't_ name the file with a proper >> version, because this image is currently _ahead_ of trunk. That will >> eventually change, of course. I'll definitely note renaming the files >> on my todo list. > > I don't want to badger you but, why is it ahead of trunk? It seems > like any patches that are good enough for the RC should be good enough > for the trunk repository. I'm confused.. I haven't seen anyone say "yeah, that doesn't look crazy" yet :) The idea is that I hack on the RC and, when people say "yeah OK", then I fold the ReleaseBuilder + Morphic changes into trunk, and version "correctly". frank |
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote:
On 18 December 2012 16:04, Chris Muller <[hidden email]> wrote: Ok, it's just that we'll need to hack on it yet again after you've versioned "correctly" and before putting it on the web-site. So the payback for testing now seems pretty low.
|
In reply to this post by Edgar De Cleene
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 08:12:47AM -0300, Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:
> > Added attached info is performing a script by Pavel, which shows the > Unimplemented calls grows and grows. > Two years ago was 206 . > Jerome Peace put info about this in Mantis, but is old and can?t find it We should work on cleaning the unimplemented calls for 4.5! Dave |
On 18 December 2012 17:13, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 08:12:47AM -0300, Edgar J. De Cleene wrote: >> >> Added attached info is performing a script by Pavel, which shows the >> Unimplemented calls grows and grows. >> Two years ago was 206 . >> Jerome Peace put info about this in Mantis, but is old and can?t find it > > We should work on cleaning the unimplemented calls for 4.5! It's on the list :) http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/6189 frank > Dave > > |
In reply to this post by Edgar De Cleene
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 08:12:47AM -0300, Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:
> > Added attached info is performing a script by Pavel, which shows the > Unimplemented calls grows and grows. > Two years ago was 206 . > Jerome Peace put info about this in Mantis, but is old and can?t find it > > Edgar The Mantis issues for background on unimplemented calls are here: http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7481 http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7042 http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=4544 Dave |
On 19 December 2012 13:43, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 08:12:47AM -0300, Edgar J. De Cleene wrote: >> >> Added attached info is performing a script by Pavel, which shows the >> Unimplemented calls grows and grows. >> Two years ago was 206 . >> Jerome Peace put info about this in Mantis, but is old and can?t find it >> >> Edgar > > The Mantis issues for background on unimplemented calls are here: > > http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7481 > http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7042 > http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=4544 I'm pointing the older reports to point to 7481, and closing them. And I've added references to same to the 4.5 feature list. frank |
On 19 December 2012 13:47, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote:
> On 19 December 2012 13:43, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 08:12:47AM -0300, Edgar J. De Cleene wrote: >>> >>> Added attached info is performing a script by Pavel, which shows the >>> Unimplemented calls grows and grows. >>> Two years ago was 206 . >>> Jerome Peace put info about this in Mantis, but is old and can?t find it >>> >>> Edgar >> >> The Mantis issues for background on unimplemented calls are here: >> >> http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7481 >> http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7042 >> http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=4544 > > I'm pointing the older reports to point to 7481, and closing them. And > I've added references to same to the 4.5 feature list. Oh, and there's 7483 as well. |
In reply to this post by David T. Lewis
On 12/19/12 10:43 AM, "David T. Lewis" <[hidden email]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 08:12:47AM -0300, Edgar J. De Cleene wrote: >> >> Added attached info is performing a script by Pavel, which shows the >> Unimplemented calls grows and grows. >> Two years ago was 206 . >> Jerome Peace put info about this in Mantis, but is old and can?t find it >> >> Edgar > > The Mantis issues for background on unimplemented calls are here: > > http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7481 > http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7042 > http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=4544 > > Dave Thanks for find it. Now I hope this become a high priority in the next release. Edgar |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |