Hi all,
I'm the President of the local robotics club, the Portland Area Robotics Society and a fairly new squeaker. Jon Hylands posted a little bit of Squeak hype from me awhile ago. My personal robot development is coming along pretty well and I'm still quite interested in this language. Still a raw newbie though. Now we're starting a rather big project within our club that we hope will establish a very popular open-source outdoor robot kit for $500. By popular, it all depends on how well it performs, but it might end up with thousands in the field. It's performance goal is to be the best RoboMagellan robot to date so it must rapidly navigate on an unmarked course of around a mile in length and use vision to locate and touch (softly) a few orange traffic cones. This has historically been a tough bag of requirements and we'd like to catalyze a breakthrough entry point to the hobby. Who knows. I was thinking it would be a good idea to use Squeak for this project but it will be a tough sell because literally nobody knows anybody who uses Squeak for robots. The opinion ranges from mostly totally ignorant to negative. Only one well-known roboticist in our sphere of communication uses Squeak and that's Jon Hylands. Lots of people use assembly language on microcomputers. Most people use C/C++ and Java I think. Is there anyone expert enough to give an interesting talk here in Portland that would be directed at people with widely varying programming backgrounds all interested in robot development. We'd really appreciate it!!! Thanks. - Robert Scheer |
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:04:55 -0800, "Robert F. Scheer"
<[hidden email]> wrote: > Is there anyone expert enough to give an interesting talk here in > Portland that would be directed at people with widely varying > programming backgrounds all interested in robot development. We'd > really appreciate it!!! Actually, by some coincidence one of my friends is doing a Smalltalk contract in Salaam, OR, as we speak. He's coming home for Christmas, but will be back there early January for a couple weeks. I'm going to see him next Saturday (week from tomorrow), and I'll see if he has any interest in doing something like that. Later, Jon -------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Hylands [hidden email] http://www.huv.com/jon Project: Micro Raptor (Small Biped Velociraptor Robot) http://www.huv.com/blog |
In reply to this post by Robert F. Scheer-2
Robert
what is the memory footprint of your robots? Let us know how we can help. http://www.squeakbyexample.org/ is one way :) Stef On 15 déc. 07, at 03:04, Robert F. Scheer wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm the President of the local robotics club, the Portland Area > Robotics > Society and a fairly new squeaker. Jon Hylands posted a little bit of > Squeak hype from me awhile ago. > > My personal robot development is coming along pretty well and I'm > still > quite interested in this language. Still a raw newbie though. > > Now we're starting a rather big project within our club that we hope > will establish a very popular open-source outdoor robot kit for $500. > By popular, it all depends on how well it performs, but it might > end up > with thousands in the field. It's performance goal is to be the best > RoboMagellan robot to date so it must rapidly navigate on an unmarked > course of around a mile in length and use vision to locate and touch > (softly) a few orange traffic cones. This has historically been a > tough > bag of requirements and we'd like to catalyze a breakthrough entry > point > to the hobby. > > Who knows. > > I was thinking it would be a good idea to use Squeak for this project > but it will be a tough sell because literally nobody knows anybody who > uses Squeak for robots. The opinion ranges from mostly totally > ignorant > to negative. Only one well-known roboticist in our sphere of > communication uses Squeak and that's Jon Hylands. Lots of people use > assembly language on microcomputers. Most people use C/C++ and Java I > think. > > Is there anyone expert enough to give an interesting talk here in > Portland that would be directed at people with widely varying > programming backgrounds all interested in robot development. We'd > really appreciate it!!! > > Thanks. > > - Robert Scheer > > > |
In reply to this post by Robert F. Scheer-2
El 12/14/07 11:04 PM, "Robert F. Scheer" <[hidden email]> escribió: > Hi all, > > I'm the President of the local robotics club, the Portland Area Robotics > Society and a fairly new squeaker. Jon Hylands posted a little bit of > Squeak hype from me awhile ago. > > My personal robot development is coming along pretty well and I'm still > quite interested in this language. Still a raw newbie though. > > Now we're starting a rather big project within our club that we hope > will establish a very popular open-source outdoor robot kit for $500. > By popular, it all depends on how well it performs, but it might end up > with thousands in the field. It's performance goal is to be the best > RoboMagellan robot to date so it must rapidly navigate on an unmarked > course of around a mile in length and use vision to locate and touch > (softly) a few orange traffic cones. This has historically been a tough > bag of requirements and we'd like to catalyze a breakthrough entry point > to the hobby. > > Who knows. > > I was thinking it would be a good idea to use Squeak for this project > but it will be a tough sell because literally nobody knows anybody who > uses Squeak for robots. The opinion ranges from mostly totally ignorant > to negative. Only one well-known roboticist in our sphere of > communication uses Squeak and that's Jon Hylands. Lots of people use > assembly language on microcomputers. Most people use C/C++ and Java I > think. > > Is there anyone expert enough to give an interesting talk here in > Portland that would be directed at people with widely varying > programming backgrounds all interested in robot development. We'd > really appreciate it!!! > > Thanks. > > - Robert Scheer I know who did in Argentina. They show in Smalltaks 2007. Send private mail if you wish. Edgar |
Thanks Edgar,
It appears there are many Squeakers in and around Portland. How did I get so lucky? Thanks for your offer of help. - Robert On Sat, 2007-12-15 at 06:34 -0300, Edgar J. De Cleene wrote: > > > El 12/14/07 11:04 PM, "Robert F. Scheer" <[hidden email]> escribió: > > > Hi all, > > > > I'm the President of the local robotics club, the Portland Area Robotics > > Society and a fairly new squeaker. Jon Hylands posted a little bit of > > Squeak hype from me awhile ago. > > > > My personal robot development is coming along pretty well and I'm still > > quite interested in this language. Still a raw newbie though. > > > > Now we're starting a rather big project within our club that we hope > > will establish a very popular open-source outdoor robot kit for $500. > > By popular, it all depends on how well it performs, but it might end up > > with thousands in the field. It's performance goal is to be the best > > RoboMagellan robot to date so it must rapidly navigate on an unmarked > > course of around a mile in length and use vision to locate and touch > > (softly) a few orange traffic cones. This has historically been a tough > > bag of requirements and we'd like to catalyze a breakthrough entry point > > to the hobby. > > > > Who knows. > > > > I was thinking it would be a good idea to use Squeak for this project > > but it will be a tough sell because literally nobody knows anybody who > > uses Squeak for robots. The opinion ranges from mostly totally ignorant > > to negative. Only one well-known roboticist in our sphere of > > communication uses Squeak and that's Jon Hylands. Lots of people use > > assembly language on microcomputers. Most people use C/C++ and Java I > > think. > > > > Is there anyone expert enough to give an interesting talk here in > > Portland that would be directed at people with widely varying > > programming backgrounds all interested in robot development. We'd > > really appreciate it!!! > > > > Thanks. > > > > - Robert Scheer > > I know who did in Argentina. > They show in Smalltaks 2007. > Send private mail if you wish. > > Edgar > > > > |
In reply to this post by stephane ducasse
Stephane,
For a project that would host a Squeak program, the machine would range from something like a Gumstix or Hammer running Linux to a mini-ITX or laptop with a dual core CPU running Linux, Windows or MAC OS's. Memory would range from 128MB - 1GB typically. My project is using 1GB currently on a Core 2 Duo Mini-ITX hosting Linux. Just scanned through your book "Squeak Learn Programming with Robots" and now you need to write the next book "Squeak - Intermediate Programming on Real Robots"!! You DO want to get interested in robots, don't you? Thanks for the great help everyone. - Robert On Sat, 2007-12-15 at 10:01 +0100, stephane ducasse wrote: > Robert > > what is the memory footprint of your robots? > Let us know how we can help. > http://www.squeakbyexample.org/ is one way :) > > Stef > > On 15 déc. 07, at 03:04, Robert F. Scheer wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I'm the President of the local robotics club, the Portland Area > > Robotics > > Society and a fairly new squeaker. Jon Hylands posted a little bit of > > Squeak hype from me awhile ago. > > > > My personal robot development is coming along pretty well and I'm > > still > > quite interested in this language. Still a raw newbie though. > > > > Now we're starting a rather big project within our club that we hope > > will establish a very popular open-source outdoor robot kit for $500. > > By popular, it all depends on how well it performs, but it might > > end up > > with thousands in the field. It's performance goal is to be the best > > RoboMagellan robot to date so it must rapidly navigate on an unmarked > > course of around a mile in length and use vision to locate and touch > > (softly) a few orange traffic cones. This has historically been a > > tough > > bag of requirements and we'd like to catalyze a breakthrough entry > > point > > to the hobby. > > > > Who knows. > > > > I was thinking it would be a good idea to use Squeak for this project > > but it will be a tough sell because literally nobody knows anybody who > > uses Squeak for robots. The opinion ranges from mostly totally > > ignorant > > to negative. Only one well-known roboticist in our sphere of > > communication uses Squeak and that's Jon Hylands. Lots of people use > > assembly language on microcomputers. Most people use C/C++ and Java I > > think. > > > > Is there anyone expert enough to give an interesting talk here in > > Portland that would be directed at people with widely varying > > programming backgrounds all interested in robot development. We'd > > really appreciate it!!! > > > > Thanks. > > > > - Robert Scheer > > > > > > > > > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |