"Stirrup" needs your help

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
6 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

"Stirrup" needs your help

Chris Muller-3
Eliot decided he wants to codename 4.6 "Stirrup" and 5.0 "Spur".

We are just a few steps from releasing we just need some volunteer(s) help.

You know, if we could coordinate and change the Jenkins build to
produce the actual release image we want, along with new .sources and
.changes, and possibly even an All-In-One, maybe that's a release
process we could really like..?

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: "Stirrup" needs your help

Levente Uzonyi-2
On Mon, 25 May 2015, Chris Muller wrote:

> Eliot decided he wants to codename 4.6 "Stirrup" and 5.0 "Spur".
>
> We are just a few steps from releasing we just need some volunteer(s) help.
>
> You know, if we could coordinate and change the Jenkins build to
> produce the actual release image we want, along with new .sources and
> .changes, and possibly even an All-In-One, maybe that's a release
> process we could really like..?

That's exactly what the ReleaseSqueakTrunk job should be doing.
http://build.squeak.org/job/ReleaseSqueakTrunk/

Levente

>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: "Stirrup" needs your help

Frank Shearar-3
On 26 May 2015 at 02:36, Levente Uzonyi <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On Mon, 25 May 2015, Chris Muller wrote:
>
>> Eliot decided he wants to codename 4.6 "Stirrup" and 5.0 "Spur".
>>
>> We are just a few steps from releasing we just need some volunteer(s)
>> help.
>>
>> You know, if we could coordinate and change the Jenkins build to
>> produce the actual release image we want, along with new .sources and
>> .changes, and possibly even an All-In-One, maybe that's a release
>> process we could really like..?
>
>
> That's exactly what the ReleaseSqueakTrunk job should be doing.
> http://build.squeak.org/job/ReleaseSqueakTrunk/

Indeed. Which currently doesn't work, because I'm getting 503s on
build.squeak.org URIs.

frank

> Levente

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: "Stirrup" needs your help

Chris Muller-3
In reply to this post by Levente Uzonyi-2
>> Eliot decided he wants to codename 4.6 "Stirrup" and 5.0 "Spur".
>>
>> We are just a few steps from releasing we just need some volunteer(s)
>> help.
>>
>> You know, if we could coordinate and change the Jenkins build to
>> produce the actual release image we want, along with new .sources and
>> .changes, and possibly even an All-In-One, maybe that's a release
>> process we could really like..?
>
>
> That's exactly what the ReleaseSqueakTrunk job should be doing.
> http://build.squeak.org/job/ReleaseSqueakTrunk/

Yes, "should".  If it would do all those things then we'd basically be
ready to "release" any day we ever wanted with nothing more than a FTP
upload, website update, and a news release.

Unfortunately, it just produces a 4.5 trunk image, not a 4.6 release
image, and it doesn't make new .changes, nor new .sources, and no new
All-In-One (or does it?).

What would it take to get us there?

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: "Stirrup" needs your help

Levente Uzonyi-2
On Tue, 26 May 2015, Chris Muller wrote:

>>> Eliot decided he wants to codename 4.6 "Stirrup" and 5.0 "Spur".
>>>
>>> We are just a few steps from releasing we just need some volunteer(s)
>>> help.
>>>
>>> You know, if we could coordinate and change the Jenkins build to
>>> produce the actual release image we want, along with new .sources and
>>> .changes, and possibly even an All-In-One, maybe that's a release
>>> process we could really like..?
>>
>>
>> That's exactly what the ReleaseSqueakTrunk job should be doing.
>> http://build.squeak.org/job/ReleaseSqueakTrunk/
>
> Yes, "should".  If it would do all those things then we'd basically be
> ready to "release" any day we ever wanted with nothing more than a FTP
> upload, website update, and a news release.
>
> Unfortunately, it just produces a 4.5 trunk image, not a 4.6 release
> image, and it doesn't make new .changes, nor new .sources, and no new
> All-In-One (or does it?).

It's the SqueakTrunk job which produces Trunk images.
IIRC the ReleaseSqueakTrunk job takes the Trunk image from SqueakTrunk.
Then it runs the code in ReleaseBuilder class, which is responsible for
the image-side changes for the next release.
I'm not sure what you'd like to do with the .sources and .changes files.

>
> What would it take to get us there?

IMHO the best would be to build the All-In-One in another job - triggered
by ReleaseSqueakTrunk.

Levente


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Box-Admins] Re: [squeak-dev] "Stirrup" needs your help

Levente Uzonyi-2
In reply to this post by Frank Shearar-3
On Tue, 26 May 2015, Frank Shearar wrote:

> On 26 May 2015 at 02:36, Levente Uzonyi <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 May 2015, Chris Muller wrote:
>>
>>> Eliot decided he wants to codename 4.6 "Stirrup" and 5.0 "Spur".
>>>
>>> We are just a few steps from releasing we just need some volunteer(s)
>>> help.
>>>
>>> You know, if we could coordinate and change the Jenkins build to
>>> produce the actual release image we want, along with new .sources and
>>> .changes, and possibly even an All-In-One, maybe that's a release
>>> process we could really like..?
>>
>>
>> That's exactly what the ReleaseSqueakTrunk job should be doing.
>> http://build.squeak.org/job/ReleaseSqueakTrunk/
>
> Indeed. Which currently doesn't work, because I'm getting 503s on
> build.squeak.org URIs.

Yep, it went down (the second time this week), but it's up again.

Levente

>
> frank
>
>> Levente
>