Administrator
|
I would like store some ordinary text files that are used as test inputs to some code. How can I save a Monticello package with the test text files together with the code? Can I do that without making the text files as code in Squeak?
Thanks, Aik-Siong Koh |
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 01:24:31PM -0700, askoh wrote:
> > I would like store some ordinary text files that are used as test inputs to > some code. How can I save a Monticello package with the test text files > together with the code? Can I do that without making the text files as code > in Squeak? No. I'm pretty sure we havn't yet implemented that feature. I'll start working on it next week or so -- Matthew Fulmer -- http://mtfulmer.wordpress.com/ |
In reply to this post by askoh
On 16/10/2008, at 17:24, askoh wrote:
Many moons ago, I cook how have any kind of files in Monticello. Date is 2004... Download and expand with a ..zip reader, so you see yourself. As nobody listen me or pretend my English is too bad, I only share this with kind people who contact me in Skype as edgardec. Edgar aka Advocatus Diaboli |
In reply to this post by Tapple Gao
The quickest approach is to simply define a method that answers a
String with the test input. Is that insufficient for some reason?
Cheers, Josh Matthew Fulmer wrote: On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 01:24:31PM -0700, askoh wrote:I would like store some ordinary text files that are used as test inputs to some code. How can I save a Monticello package with the test text files together with the code? Can I do that without making the text files as code in Squeak?No. I'm pretty sure we havn't yet implemented that feature. I'll start working on it next week or so |
Administrator
|
Text file was just an example. But the files could be images, binaries, etc. Then there are folders or directories too. A complete solution would be great for testing and quality assurance in general.
Aik-Siong Koh
|
MCZ is meant for development, not distribution. Use SAR for that,
which can bundle arbitrary files. . - Bert - Am 17.10.2008 um 04:20 schrieb askoh <[hidden email]>: > > Text file was just an example. But the files could be images, > binaries, etc. > Then there are folders or directories too. A complete solution would > be > great for testing and quality assurance in general. > Aik-Siong Koh > > > > Joshua Gargus-2 wrote: >> >> The quickest approach is to simply define a method that answers a >> String >> with the test input. Is that insufficient for some reason? >> >> Cheers, >> Josh >> >> >> >> >> Matthew Fulmer wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 01:24:31PM -0700, askoh wrote: >>> >>>> I would like store some ordinary text files that are used as test >>>> inputs >>>> to >>>> some code. How can I save a Monticello package with the test text >>>> files >>>> together with the code? Can I do that without making the text >>>> files as >>>> code >>>> in Squeak? >>>> >>> >>> No. I'm pretty sure we havn't yet implemented that feature. I'll >>> start working on it next week or so >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Storing-non-code-files-in-Monticello-tp20016782p20026042.html > Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > |
Administrator
|
Thanks, for more info:
http://www.visoracle.com/squeak/faq/sar-installer.html
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |