Hello
TEST: Evaluate Compiler recompileAll in a Workspace in version Squeak4.4-12324. RESULT: Brings up a syntax error Method #roll: in class Random does not compile. Neither does it compile this version http://ftp.squeak.org/4.4alpha/Squeak4.4-11925.zip (March 2012). NOTE: I found out about this because I was running Smalltalk unloadAllKnownPackages in version Squeak4.4-11925 --Hannes |
On 29 December 2012 08:40, H. Hirzel <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hello > > TEST: > Evaluate > > Compiler recompileAll > > in a Workspace > in version Squeak4.4-12324. > > > RESULT: > > Brings up a syntax error > > Method #roll: in class Random does not compile. Oddly, it does compile if you touch the source (delete the last character and replace it) in a Browser and accept. frank > Neither does it compile this version > http://ftp.squeak.org/4.4alpha/Squeak4.4-11925.zip (March 2012). > > > NOTE: > > I found out about this because I was running > > Smalltalk unloadAllKnownPackages > > in version Squeak4.4-11925 > > > --Hannes > |
And in a pristine 4.3 image
Compiler recompileAll runs fine. On 12/29/12, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: > On 29 December 2012 08:40, H. Hirzel <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Hello >> >> TEST: >> Evaluate >> >> Compiler recompileAll >> >> in a Workspace >> in version Squeak4.4-12324. >> >> >> RESULT: >> >> Brings up a syntax error >> >> Method #roll: in class Random does not compile. > > Oddly, it does compile if you touch the source (delete the last > character and replace it) in a Browser and accept. > > frank > >> Neither does it compile this version >> http://ftp.squeak.org/4.4alpha/Squeak4.4-11925.zip (March 2012). >> >> >> NOTE: >> >> I found out about this because I was running >> >> Smalltalk unloadAllKnownPackages >> >> in version Squeak4.4-11925 >> >> >> --Hannes >> > > |
For testing I deleted the #roll method of class Random. Then
Compiler recompileAll fails with another method. See screen shot And the same happens with March 2012 version http://ftp.squeak.org/4.4alpha/Squeak4.4-11925.zip So the error was introduced in between December 23, 2011 and March 2012 or alternatively it has something to do with the VM version. On 12/29/12, H. Hirzel <[hidden email]> wrote: > And in a pristine 4.3 image > Compiler recompileAll > runs fine. > > On 12/29/12, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: >> On 29 December 2012 08:40, H. Hirzel <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> Hello >>> >>> TEST: >>> Evaluate >>> >>> Compiler recompileAll >>> >>> in a Workspace >>> in version Squeak4.4-12324. >>> >>> >>> RESULT: >>> >>> Brings up a syntax error >>> >>> Method #roll: in class Random does not compile. >> >> Oddly, it does compile if you touch the source (delete the last >> character and replace it) in a Browser and accept. >> >> frank >> >>> Neither does it compile this version >>> http://ftp.squeak.org/4.4alpha/Squeak4.4-11925.zip (March 2012). >>> >>> >>> NOTE: >>> >>> I found out about this because I was running >>> >>> Smalltalk unloadAllKnownPackages >>> >>> in version Squeak4.4-11925 >>> >>> >>> --Hannes >>> >> >> > |
The screen shot
On 12/29/12, H. Hirzel <[hidden email]> wrote: > For testing I deleted the #roll method of class Random. Then > Compiler recompileAll > fails with another method. See screen shot > > And the same happens with March 2012 version > http://ftp.squeak.org/4.4alpha/Squeak4.4-11925.zip > > So the error was introduced in between December 23, 2011 and March 2012 > or alternatively it has something to do with the VM version. > > > > On 12/29/12, H. Hirzel <[hidden email]> wrote: >> And in a pristine 4.3 image >> Compiler recompileAll >> runs fine. >> >> On 12/29/12, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> On 29 December 2012 08:40, H. Hirzel <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> Hello >>>> >>>> TEST: >>>> Evaluate >>>> >>>> Compiler recompileAll >>>> >>>> in a Workspace >>>> in version Squeak4.4-12324. >>>> >>>> >>>> RESULT: >>>> >>>> Brings up a syntax error >>>> >>>> Method #roll: in class Random does not compile. >>> >>> Oddly, it does compile if you touch the source (delete the last >>> character and replace it) in a Browser and accept. >>> >>> frank >>> >>>> Neither does it compile this version >>>> http://ftp.squeak.org/4.4alpha/Squeak4.4-11925.zip (March 2012). >>>> >>>> >>>> NOTE: >>>> >>>> I found out about this because I was running >>>> >>>> Smalltalk unloadAllKnownPackages >>>> >>>> in version Squeak4.4-11925 >>>> >>>> >>>> --Hannes >>>> >>> >>> >> > TestSqueak4.4-12324-Failure-Compiler-recompileAll.png (56K) Download Attachment |
This looks like decompiled code...
Why recompileAll could not find the source? Nicolas 2012/12/29 H. Hirzel <[hidden email]>: > The screen shot > > On 12/29/12, H. Hirzel <[hidden email]> wrote: >> For testing I deleted the #roll method of class Random. Then >> Compiler recompileAll >> fails with another method. See screen shot >> >> And the same happens with March 2012 version >> http://ftp.squeak.org/4.4alpha/Squeak4.4-11925.zip >> >> So the error was introduced in between December 23, 2011 and March 2012 >> or alternatively it has something to do with the VM version. >> >> >> >> On 12/29/12, H. Hirzel <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> And in a pristine 4.3 image >>> Compiler recompileAll >>> runs fine. >>> >>> On 12/29/12, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> On 29 December 2012 08:40, H. Hirzel <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>> Hello >>>>> >>>>> TEST: >>>>> Evaluate >>>>> >>>>> Compiler recompileAll >>>>> >>>>> in a Workspace >>>>> in version Squeak4.4-12324. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> RESULT: >>>>> >>>>> Brings up a syntax error >>>>> >>>>> Method #roll: in class Random does not compile. >>>> >>>> Oddly, it does compile if you touch the source (delete the last >>>> character and replace it) in a Browser and accept. >>>> >>>> frank >>>> >>>>> Neither does it compile this version >>>>> http://ftp.squeak.org/4.4alpha/Squeak4.4-11925.zip (March 2012). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> NOTE: >>>>> >>>>> I found out about this because I was running >>>>> >>>>> Smalltalk unloadAllKnownPackages >>>>> >>>>> in version Squeak4.4-11925 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --Hannes >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > > |
On 29 December 2012 14:19, Nicolas Cellier
<[hidden email]> wrote: > This looks like decompiled code... That, and also note that the error's right the token "_r5", making me think of the underscore-in-selector preference. frank > Why recompileAll could not find the source? > > Nicolas > > 2012/12/29 H. Hirzel <[hidden email]>: >> The screen shot >> >> On 12/29/12, H. Hirzel <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> For testing I deleted the #roll method of class Random. Then >>> Compiler recompileAll >>> fails with another method. See screen shot >>> >>> And the same happens with March 2012 version >>> http://ftp.squeak.org/4.4alpha/Squeak4.4-11925.zip >>> >>> So the error was introduced in between December 23, 2011 and March 2012 >>> or alternatively it has something to do with the VM version. >>> >>> >>> >>> On 12/29/12, H. Hirzel <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> And in a pristine 4.3 image >>>> Compiler recompileAll >>>> runs fine. >>>> >>>> On 12/29/12, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>> On 29 December 2012 08:40, H. Hirzel <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>> Hello >>>>>> >>>>>> TEST: >>>>>> Evaluate >>>>>> >>>>>> Compiler recompileAll >>>>>> >>>>>> in a Workspace >>>>>> in version Squeak4.4-12324. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> RESULT: >>>>>> >>>>>> Brings up a syntax error >>>>>> >>>>>> Method #roll: in class Random does not compile. >>>>> >>>>> Oddly, it does compile if you touch the source (delete the last >>>>> character and replace it) in a Browser and accept. >>>>> >>>>> frank >>>>> >>>>>> Neither does it compile this version >>>>>> http://ftp.squeak.org/4.4alpha/Squeak4.4-11925.zip (March 2012). >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> NOTE: >>>>>> >>>>>> I found out about this because I was running >>>>>> >>>>>> Smalltalk unloadAllKnownPackages >>>>>> >>>>>> in version Squeak4.4-11925 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> --Hannes >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> > |
2012/12/29 Frank Shearar <[hidden email]>:
> On 29 December 2012 14:19, Nicolas Cellier > <[hidden email]> wrote: >> This looks like decompiled code... > > That, and also note that the error's right the token "_r5", making me > think of the underscore-in-selector preference. > > frank > That would not be a solution because Decompiler messed temp var names and declaration. We shall better not trust the Decompiled code in this case... I thought this issue was solved, but my memory is more selective than an issue tracker ;) Nicolas >> Why recompileAll could not find the source? >> >> Nicolas >> >> 2012/12/29 H. Hirzel <[hidden email]>: >>> The screen shot >>> >>> On 12/29/12, H. Hirzel <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> For testing I deleted the #roll method of class Random. Then >>>> Compiler recompileAll >>>> fails with another method. See screen shot >>>> >>>> And the same happens with March 2012 version >>>> http://ftp.squeak.org/4.4alpha/Squeak4.4-11925.zip >>>> >>>> So the error was introduced in between December 23, 2011 and March 2012 >>>> or alternatively it has something to do with the VM version. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 12/29/12, H. Hirzel <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>> And in a pristine 4.3 image >>>>> Compiler recompileAll >>>>> runs fine. >>>>> >>>>> On 12/29/12, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>> On 29 December 2012 08:40, H. Hirzel <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>>> Hello >>>>>>> >>>>>>> TEST: >>>>>>> Evaluate >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Compiler recompileAll >>>>>>> >>>>>>> in a Workspace >>>>>>> in version Squeak4.4-12324. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> RESULT: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Brings up a syntax error >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Method #roll: in class Random does not compile. >>>>>> >>>>>> Oddly, it does compile if you touch the source (delete the last >>>>>> character and replace it) in a Browser and accept. >>>>>> >>>>>> frank >>>>>> >>>>>>> Neither does it compile this version >>>>>>> http://ftp.squeak.org/4.4alpha/Squeak4.4-11925.zip (March 2012). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> NOTE: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I found out about this because I was running >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Smalltalk unloadAllKnownPackages >>>>>>> >>>>>>> in version Squeak4.4-11925 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --Hannes >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> > |
The sources file was not present in the working directory.
With SqueakV41.sources added Compiler recompileAll runs through fine. --Hannes On 12/29/12, Nicolas Cellier <[hidden email]> wrote: > 2012/12/29 Frank Shearar <[hidden email]>: >> On 29 December 2012 14:19, Nicolas Cellier >> <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> This looks like decompiled code... >> >> That, and also note that the error's right the token "_r5", making me >> think of the underscore-in-selector preference. >> >> frank >> > > That would not be a solution because Decompiler messed temp var names > and declaration. > We shall better not trust the Decompiled code in this case... > I thought this issue was solved, but my memory is more selective than > an issue tracker ;) > > Nicolas > >>> Why recompileAll could not find the source? >>> >>> Nicolas >>> >>> 2012/12/29 H. Hirzel <[hidden email]>: >>>> The screen shot >>>> >>>> On 12/29/12, H. Hirzel <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>> For testing I deleted the #roll method of class Random. Then >>>>> Compiler recompileAll >>>>> fails with another method. See screen shot >>>>> >>>>> And the same happens with March 2012 version >>>>> http://ftp.squeak.org/4.4alpha/Squeak4.4-11925.zip >>>>> >>>>> So the error was introduced in between December 23, 2011 and March >>>>> 2012 >>>>> or alternatively it has something to do with the VM version. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 12/29/12, H. Hirzel <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>> And in a pristine 4.3 image >>>>>> Compiler recompileAll >>>>>> runs fine. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 12/29/12, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>>> On 29 December 2012 08:40, H. Hirzel <[hidden email]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Hello >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> TEST: >>>>>>>> Evaluate >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Compiler recompileAll >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> in a Workspace >>>>>>>> in version Squeak4.4-12324. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> RESULT: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Brings up a syntax error >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Method #roll: in class Random does not compile. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Oddly, it does compile if you touch the source (delete the last >>>>>>> character and replace it) in a Browser and accept. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> frank >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Neither does it compile this version >>>>>>>> http://ftp.squeak.org/4.4alpha/Squeak4.4-11925.zip (March 2012). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> NOTE: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I found out about this because I was running >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Smalltalk unloadAllKnownPackages >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> in version Squeak4.4-11925 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> --Hannes >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > |
In reply to this post by Nicolas Cellier
On 29 December 2012 14:28, Nicolas Cellier
<[hidden email]> wrote: > 2012/12/29 Frank Shearar <[hidden email]>: >> On 29 December 2012 14:19, Nicolas Cellier >> <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> This looks like decompiled code... >> >> That, and also note that the error's right the token "_r5", making me >> think of the underscore-in-selector preference. >> >> frank >> > > That would not be a solution because Decompiler messed temp var names > and declaration. > We shall better not trust the Decompiled code in this case... > I thought this issue was solved, but my memory is more selective than > an issue tracker ;) I meant that it could be a confounding factor, not a workaround. It seems sensible that decompilable code ought always to be compilable. Further, I'd expect (assuming no Compiler changes) that the original bytecode and the decompiled-recompiled bytecode to be identical. frank > Nicolas > >>> Why recompileAll could not find the source? >>> >>> Nicolas >>> >>> 2012/12/29 H. Hirzel <[hidden email]>: >>>> The screen shot >>>> >>>> On 12/29/12, H. Hirzel <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>> For testing I deleted the #roll method of class Random. Then >>>>> Compiler recompileAll >>>>> fails with another method. See screen shot >>>>> >>>>> And the same happens with March 2012 version >>>>> http://ftp.squeak.org/4.4alpha/Squeak4.4-11925.zip >>>>> >>>>> So the error was introduced in between December 23, 2011 and March 2012 >>>>> or alternatively it has something to do with the VM version. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 12/29/12, H. Hirzel <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>> And in a pristine 4.3 image >>>>>> Compiler recompileAll >>>>>> runs fine. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 12/29/12, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>>> On 29 December 2012 08:40, H. Hirzel <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>>>> Hello >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> TEST: >>>>>>>> Evaluate >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Compiler recompileAll >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> in a Workspace >>>>>>>> in version Squeak4.4-12324. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> RESULT: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Brings up a syntax error >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Method #roll: in class Random does not compile. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Oddly, it does compile if you touch the source (delete the last >>>>>>> character and replace it) in a Browser and accept. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> frank >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Neither does it compile this version >>>>>>>> http://ftp.squeak.org/4.4alpha/Squeak4.4-11925.zip (March 2012). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> NOTE: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I found out about this because I was running >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Smalltalk unloadAllKnownPackages >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> in version Squeak4.4-11925 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> --Hannes >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > |
2012/12/29 Frank Shearar <[hidden email]>:
> On 29 December 2012 14:28, Nicolas Cellier > <[hidden email]> wrote: >> 2012/12/29 Frank Shearar <[hidden email]>: >>> On 29 December 2012 14:19, Nicolas Cellier >>> <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> This looks like decompiled code... >>> >>> That, and also note that the error's right the token "_r5", making me >>> think of the underscore-in-selector preference. >>> >>> frank >>> >> >> That would not be a solution because Decompiler messed temp var names >> and declaration. >> We shall better not trust the Decompiled code in this case... >> I thought this issue was solved, but my memory is more selective than >> an issue tracker ;) > > I meant that it could be a confounding factor, not a workaround. > > It seems sensible that decompilable code ought always to be > compilable. Further, I'd expect (assuming no Compiler changes) that > the original bytecode and the decompiled-recompiled bytecode to be > identical. > > frank > Ideally yes. But see DecompilerTests>>#decompilerFailures and usage... Nicolas >> Nicolas >> >>>> Why recompileAll could not find the source? >>>> >>>> Nicolas >>>> >>>> 2012/12/29 H. Hirzel <[hidden email]>: >>>>> The screen shot >>>>> >>>>> On 12/29/12, H. Hirzel <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>> For testing I deleted the #roll method of class Random. Then >>>>>> Compiler recompileAll >>>>>> fails with another method. See screen shot >>>>>> >>>>>> And the same happens with March 2012 version >>>>>> http://ftp.squeak.org/4.4alpha/Squeak4.4-11925.zip >>>>>> >>>>>> So the error was introduced in between December 23, 2011 and March 2012 >>>>>> or alternatively it has something to do with the VM version. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 12/29/12, H. Hirzel <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>>> And in a pristine 4.3 image >>>>>>> Compiler recompileAll >>>>>>> runs fine. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 12/29/12, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 29 December 2012 08:40, H. Hirzel <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hello >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> TEST: >>>>>>>>> Evaluate >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Compiler recompileAll >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> in a Workspace >>>>>>>>> in version Squeak4.4-12324. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> RESULT: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Brings up a syntax error >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Method #roll: in class Random does not compile. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Oddly, it does compile if you touch the source (delete the last >>>>>>>> character and replace it) in a Browser and accept. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> frank >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Neither does it compile this version >>>>>>>>> http://ftp.squeak.org/4.4alpha/Squeak4.4-11925.zip (March 2012). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> NOTE: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I found out about this because I was running >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Smalltalk unloadAllKnownPackages >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> in version Squeak4.4-11925 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> --Hannes >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > |
As it runs fine with SqueakV41.sources present I would not consider
this a problem for the release of 4.4. --Hannes On 12/29/12, Nicolas Cellier <[hidden email]> wrote: > 2012/12/29 Frank Shearar <[hidden email]>: >> On 29 December 2012 14:28, Nicolas Cellier >> <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> 2012/12/29 Frank Shearar <[hidden email]>: >>>> On 29 December 2012 14:19, Nicolas Cellier >>>> <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>> This looks like decompiled code... >>>> >>>> That, and also note that the error's right the token "_r5", making me >>>> think of the underscore-in-selector preference. >>>> >>>> frank >>>> >>> >>> That would not be a solution because Decompiler messed temp var names >>> and declaration. >>> We shall better not trust the Decompiled code in this case... >>> I thought this issue was solved, but my memory is more selective than >>> an issue tracker ;) >> >> I meant that it could be a confounding factor, not a workaround. >> >> It seems sensible that decompilable code ought always to be >> compilable. Further, I'd expect (assuming no Compiler changes) that >> the original bytecode and the decompiled-recompiled bytecode to be >> identical. >> >> frank >> > > Ideally yes. > But see DecompilerTests>>#decompilerFailures and usage... > > Nicolas > >>> Nicolas >>> >>>>> Why recompileAll could not find the source? >>>>> >>>>> Nicolas >>>>> >>>>> 2012/12/29 H. Hirzel <[hidden email]>: >>>>>> The screen shot >>>>>> >>>>>> On 12/29/12, H. Hirzel <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>>> For testing I deleted the #roll method of class Random. Then >>>>>>> Compiler recompileAll >>>>>>> fails with another method. See screen shot >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And the same happens with March 2012 version >>>>>>> http://ftp.squeak.org/4.4alpha/Squeak4.4-11925.zip >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So the error was introduced in between December 23, 2011 and March >>>>>>> 2012 >>>>>>> or alternatively it has something to do with the VM version. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 12/29/12, H. Hirzel <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>>>> And in a pristine 4.3 image >>>>>>>> Compiler recompileAll >>>>>>>> runs fine. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 12/29/12, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 29 December 2012 08:40, H. Hirzel <[hidden email]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Hello >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> TEST: >>>>>>>>>> Evaluate >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Compiler recompileAll >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> in a Workspace >>>>>>>>>> in version Squeak4.4-12324. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> RESULT: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Brings up a syntax error >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Method #roll: in class Random does not compile. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Oddly, it does compile if you touch the source (delete the last >>>>>>>>> character and replace it) in a Browser and accept. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> frank >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Neither does it compile this version >>>>>>>>>> http://ftp.squeak.org/4.4alpha/Squeak4.4-11925.zip (March 2012). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> NOTE: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I found out about this because I was running >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Smalltalk unloadAllKnownPackages >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> in version Squeak4.4-11925 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> --Hannes >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |