TextLineInterval>>#justifiedPadFor: and spurious dirty packages

This method keeps appearing in my image, causing a dirty ST80 package.
 Is anyone else seeing this?  No senders, but I keep needing to revert
the package to know what I've got dirty in the image.

Also seeing some spurious class-category "changes" causing dirty
packages, even though I'm not doing any recategorizing..

On 2 December 2013 20:18, Chris Muller <[hidden email]> wrote:
> This method keeps appearing in my image, causing a dirty ST80 package.
>  Is anyone else seeing this?  No senders, but I keep needing to revert
> the package to know what I've got dirty in the image.

I can't say I've seen this.

> Also seeing some spurious class-category "changes" causing dirty
> packages, even though I'm not doing any recategorizing..

I make sure nowadays that I don't issue commits with shuffled class
categories, but I certainly have done so in the past. Monticello
considers an order change in the categories to be significant, but I
vaguely remember Bert committing something to mitigate the issue.

frank

It appears it was due to a corrupt ancestry in 45Deprecated.  45Deprecated-fbs.3 was the version included in Squeak4.5-13352 at the FTP site, but since no future package had that version as an ancestor, everything was merged during the update, resulting in spurious dirties.

I reposted Squeak4.5-13352 with 45Deprecated-fbs.5 loaded and that seems to fix it. 

On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote:

On 2 December 2013 20:18, Chris Muller <[hidden email]> wrote:
> This method keeps appearing in my image, causing a dirty ST80 package.
>  Is anyone else seeing this?  No senders, but I keep needing to revert
> the package to know what I've got dirty in the image.

I can't say I've seen this.

> Also seeing some spurious class-category "changes" causing dirty
> packages, even though I'm not doing any recategorizing..

I make sure nowadays that I don't issue commits with shuffled class
categories, but I certainly have done so in the past. Monticello
considers an order change in the categories to be significant, but I
vaguely remember Bert committing something to mitigate the issue.

frank