The Inbox: Collections-ct.848.mcz

> On 12.08.2019, at 13:52, [hidden email] wrote:
>
> A new version of Collections was added to project The Inbox:
> http://source.squeak.org/inbox/Collections-ct.848.mcz
>
> ==================== Summary ====================
>
> Name: Collections-ct.848
> Author: ct
> Time: 12 August 2019, 1:52:05.273463 pm
> UUID: a43047b1-7885-fa49-bfe0-f5bd175d66e4
> Ancestors: Collections-fn.847
>
> Add visibility test for Characters

>
> Thanks to jrm for the hint!
>
> =============== Diff against Collections-fn.847 ===============
>
> Item was added:
> + ----- Method: Character>>isInvisible (in category 'testing') -----
> + isInvisible
> +
> + ^ (self > 31 or: [#(9 10 13) includes: self asciiValue]) not!
>
>

> On 2019-08-12, at 7:21 AM, Tobias Pape <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>
>> On 12.08.2019, at 13:52, [hidden email] wrote:
>>
>> A new version of Collections was added to project The Inbox:
>> http://source.squeak.org/inbox/Collections-ct.848.mcz
>>
>> ==================== Summary ====================
>>
>> Name: Collections-ct.848
>> Author: ct
>> Time: 12 August 2019, 1:52:05.273463 pm
>> UUID: a43047b1-7885-fa49-bfe0-f5bd175d66e4
>> Ancestors: Collections-fn.847
>>
>> Add visibility test for Characters
>
> To be precise, whether these characters are invisible depends on the Font used…

> On 12.08.2019, at 18:46, tim Rowledge <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 2019-08-12, at 7:21 AM, Tobias Pape <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 12.08.2019, at 13:52, [hidden email] wrote:
>>>
>>> A new version of Collections was added to project The Inbox:
>>> http://source.squeak.org/inbox/Collections-ct.848.mcz
>>>
>>> ==================== Summary ====================
>>>
>>> Name: Collections-ct.848
>>> Author: ct
>>> Time: 12 August 2019, 1:52:05.273463 pm
>>> UUID: a43047b1-7885-fa49-bfe0-f5bd175d66e4
>>> Ancestors: Collections-fn.847
>>>
>>> Add visibility test for Characters
>>
>> To be precise, whether these characters are invisible depends on the Font used…
>
> Not to mention that a unicode character may be invisible at many more values. How exactly do they handle those? There are large swathes of legit unicode where there is no character point, and many where there is supposed to be a glyph but many fonts lack one.
>
> Sigh. Why can't everyone just stick with good old sensible english lettering? ;-)
>

> On 2019-08-12, at 11:30 AM, Tobias Pape <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>
>> On 12.08.2019, at 18:46, tim Rowledge <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Sigh. Why can't everyone just stick with good old sensible english lettering? ;-)
>>
>
> Hö?
>
> Я не знаю :D