A new version of Collections was added to project The Inbox:
http://source.squeak.org/inbox/Collections-pre.679.mcz ==================== Summary ==================== Name: Collections-pre.679 Author: pre Time: 26 February 2016, 4:04:56.205127 pm UUID: 2ac5821c-d6f5-418c-ab07-ed3c2b9de62c Ancestors: Collections-eem.678 This is a new iteration method which allows the iteration over asymmetric pairs. I have found this useful in game collision detections or duplicate detections. Alternatively we might want to take a second collection as input and create asymmetric pairs from self and this second collection. =============== Diff against Collections-eem.678 =============== Item was added: + ----- Method: Collection>>asymmetricPairsDo: (in category 'accessing') ----- + asymmetricPairsDo: aBlock + + | iterationCollection currentElement | + iterationCollection := self copy. + + [currentElement := iterationCollection anyOne. + iterationCollection remove: currentElement. + iterationCollection isEmpty not] + whileTrue: [ iterationCollection + do: [:element | aBlock value: currentElement value: element]].! |
But this already exist, at least for SequenceableCollection, try: (1 to: 4) combinations: 2 atATimeDo: [:e | Transcript cr; show: e printString] 2016-02-26 16:05 GMT+01:00 <[hidden email]>: A new version of Collections was added to project The Inbox: |
Oh! Cool. :)
Well then the only proposition I have is adding it to the abstract collection class as iterating over combinations is not specific to a sequenceable collection. Or am I missing something here? Von: [hidden email] <[hidden email]> im Auftrag von Nicolas Cellier <[hidden email]>
Gesendet: Freitag, 26. Februar 2016 19:31 An: The general-purpose Squeak developers list Betreff: Re: [squeak-dev] The Inbox: Collections-pre.679.mcz But this already exist, at least for SequenceableCollection, try:
(1 to: 4) combinations: 2 atATimeDo: [:e | Transcript cr; show: e printString] 2016-02-26 16:05 GMT+01:00 <[hidden email]>:
A new version of Collections was added to project The Inbox: |
2016-02-27 16:36 GMT+01:00 Rein, Patrick <[hidden email]>:
Yes, you are right, but current implementation rely on indexing from 1 to self size... Generalization is trivial if we tolerate storing subcollections in an Array even if we iterate on a Set, ^self asArray combinations: n atATimeDo: aBlock If we insist on storing subcollections in self species, that may require a greater effort. Von: [hidden email] <[hidden email]> im Auftrag von Nicolas Cellier <[hidden email]> Gesendet: Freitag, 26. Februar 2016 19:31 An: The general-purpose Squeak developers list Betreff: Re: [squeak-dev] The Inbox: Collections-pre.679.mcz But this already exist, at least for SequenceableCollection, try:
(1 to: 4) combinations: 2 atATimeDo: [:e | Transcript cr; show: e printString] 2016-02-26 16:05 GMT+01:00 <[hidden email]>:
A new version of Collections was added to project The Inbox: |
In reply to this post by commits-2
I experimented with a bouncing atoms kind of system where atoms could collide and change direction. I sorted atoms based on vertical position and tested collisions with a subset based on vertical position. Then I could keep the collision testing to only a small number of atoms. Best, Karl On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 4:05 PM, <[hidden email]> wrote: A new version of Collections was added to project The Inbox: |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |