The Inbox: Kernel-eem.1295.mcz
Locked
 
|
A new version of Kernel was added to project The Inbox:
http://source.squeak.org/inbox/Kernel-eem.1295.mcz ==================== Summary ==================== Name: Kernel-eem.1295 Author: eem Time: 24 January 2020, 12:09:14.247651 pm UUID: 1f1fc6c8-7160-4101-9c48-56ec5784616f Ancestors: Kernel-eem.1294 Fix comment typo for perform:with:with:with:with:with: =============== Diff against Kernel-eem.1294 =============== Item was changed: ----- Method: Object>>perform:with:with:with:with:with: (in category 'message handling') ----- perform: aSymbol with: firstObject with: secondObject with: thirdObject with: fourthObject with: fifthObject "Send the selector, aSymbol, to the receiver with the given arguments. + Fail if the number of arguments expected by the selector is not five. - Fail if the number of arguments expected by the selector is not four. Primitive. Optional. See Object documentation whatIsAPrimitive." <primitive: 83> ^ self perform: aSymbol withArguments: { firstObject. secondObject. thirdObject. fourthObject. fifthObject }! |
Re: The Inbox: Kernel-eem.1295.mcz
|
|
Is the history clean? This commit does not really depend on Kernel-eem.1294, does it? Von: Squeak-dev <[hidden email]> im Auftrag von [hidden email] <[hidden email]>
Gesendet: Freitag, 24. Januar 2020 21:09:17 An: [hidden email] Betreff: [squeak-dev] The Inbox: Kernel-eem.1295.mcz A new version of Kernel was added to project The Inbox:
http://source.squeak.org/inbox/Kernel-eem.1295.mcz ==================== Summary ==================== Name: Kernel-eem.1295 Author: eem Time: 24 January 2020, 12:09:14.247651 pm UUID: 1f1fc6c8-7160-4101-9c48-56ec5784616f Ancestors: Kernel-eem.1294 Fix comment typo for perform:with:with:with:with:with: =============== Diff against Kernel-eem.1294 =============== Item was changed: ----- Method: Object>>perform:with:with:with:with:with: (in category 'message handling') ----- perform: aSymbol with: firstObject with: secondObject with: thirdObject with: fourthObject with: fifthObject "Send the selector, aSymbol, to the receiver with the given arguments. + Fail if the number of arguments expected by the selector is not five. - Fail if the number of arguments expected by the selector is not four. Primitive. Optional. See Object documentation whatIsAPrimitive." <primitive: 83> ^ self perform: aSymbol withArguments: { firstObject. secondObject. thirdObject. fourthObject. fifthObject }!
Carpe Squeak!
|
Re: The Inbox: Kernel-eem.1295.mcz
|
|
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 12:38 PM Thiede, Christoph <[hidden email]> wrote:
No. I just committed it straight after committing 1294.
_,,,^..^,,,_ best, Eliot |
Re: The Inbox: Kernel-eem.1295.mcz
|
|
In reply to this post by commits-2
But wouldn't you want to have each independent inbox commit be based on the latest Trunk version? Unless I misunderstood every admonition I have been told since I started contributing to Squeak, the current ancestry makes it impossible to merge Kernel-eem.1295
into Trunk *without* Kernel-eem.1294, or am I wrong?
And btw, is it also intended that Kernel-eem.1294 has two ancestors? :)
Best,
Christoph
Von: Squeak-dev <[hidden email]> im Auftrag von Eliot Miranda <[hidden email]>
Gesendet: Samstag, 25. Januar 2020, 03:19 An: The general-purpose Squeak developers list Betreff: Re: [squeak-dev] The Inbox: Kernel-eem.1295.mcz On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 12:38 PM Thiede, Christoph <[hidden email]> wrote:
No. I just committed it straight after committing 1294.
_,,,^..^,,,_
best, Eliot
Carpe Squeak!
|
Re: The Inbox: Kernel-eem.1295.mcz
|
|
Hi Christophe, On Jan 25, 2020, at 4:38 AM, Thiede, Christoph <[hidden email]> wrote:
There are lots of ideas in inbox kernel right now and that situation will continue until we get the release out. The important thing is to keep the ideas flowing and being able to be seen in inbox, not that inbox is well organized. Or should I spend more time on submitting to inbox a
|
«
Return to Squeak - Dev
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |