A new version of Monticello was added to project The Inbox:
http://source.squeak.org/inbox/Monticello-jr.707.mcz ==================== Summary ==================== Name: Monticello-jr.707 Author: jr Time: 29 December 2019, 6:42:29.985327 pm UUID: 5f498b54-b255-a140-bd55-c5f01b5b03ca Ancestors: Monticello-ct.706 Don't log source if system changes are suppressed. To be able to make some tests less noisy in the changes file. =============== Diff against Monticello-ct.706 =============== Item was changed: ----- Method: MCMethodDefinition>>asMethodAddition (in category 'converting') ----- asMethodAddition ^MethodAddition new compile: source classified: category withStamp: timeStamp notifying: nil + logSource: SystemChangeNotifier uniqueInstance isBroadcasting - logSource: true inClass: self actualClass.! |
> On 29.12.2019, at 18:42, [hidden email] wrote: > > A new version of Monticello was added to project The Inbox: > http://source.squeak.org/inbox/Monticello-jr.707.mcz > > ==================== Summary ==================== > > Name: Monticello-jr.707 > Author: jr Isn't Jakob Trunk-commiter already? :D > Time: 29 December 2019, 6:42:29.985327 pm > UUID: 5f498b54-b255-a140-bd55-c5f01b5b03ca > Ancestors: Monticello-ct.706 > > Don't log source if system changes are suppressed. > > To be able to make some tests less noisy in the changes file. > > =============== Diff against Monticello-ct.706 =============== > > Item was changed: > ----- Method: MCMethodDefinition>>asMethodAddition (in category 'converting') ----- > asMethodAddition > ^MethodAddition new > compile: source > classified: category > withStamp: timeStamp > notifying: nil > + logSource: SystemChangeNotifier uniqueInstance isBroadcasting > - logSource: true > inClass: self actualClass.! > > |
Le dim. 29 déc. 2019 à 19:07, Tobias Pape <[hidden email]> a écrit :
I don't think so. +1 However, concerning this change, it's better to think twice. There are a lot of senders of doSilently: and I don't think that the intention was to not log into .changes Are we sure that we will not loose source code of installed stuff? > Time: 29 December 2019, 6:42:29.985327 pm |
Nicolas Cellier <[hidden email]> schrieb am So., 29. Dez. 2019, 19:26:
That's why it is here now. :-)
If there is a more appropriate way to mask changes loaded during tests, I will be glad to use it. Currently I sprinkle doSilently: all over those tests but the Monticello loadings still get logged. I wish they were silent, but how to control this? |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |