A new version of Monticello was added to project The Inbox:
http://source.squeak.org/inbox/Monticello-nice.399.mcz ==================== Summary ==================== Name: Monticello-nice.399 Author: nice Time: 6 September 2010, 11:16:24.627 pm UUID: d0ada69a-e513-4b38-9b6b-f332b31f61fb Ancestors: Monticello-ar.398 Feature 1: let Keep and Reject buttons select the next unresolved conflict in the list. Feature 2: if there is no more conflict in the list, let Keep and Reject select the next non conflict in the list. The first feature is powerfull for deciding fast without many keyboard/mouse motions. It should be complemented by a shortcut key. The second feature is questionnable... That's why this version made a visit to the inbox afterall... =============== Diff against Monticello-ar.398 =============== Item was added: + ----- Method: MCMergeBrowser>>selectNextUnresolvedConflict (in category 'as yet unclassified') ----- + selectNextUnresolvedConflict + "Try and select the next unresolved conflict starting at current selection in the list, wrapping at beginning. + If there is no more unresolved conflict, then simply move to next non conflict item in the list. + This method makes assumption that conflicts are always sorted before non conflicts items." + (self findListMorph: #list) + ifNotNil: + [:aMorph | + | currentIndex nextUnresolvedIndex | + currentIndex := aMorph getCurrentSelectionIndex min: conflicts size. + nextUnresolvedIndex := (currentIndex + 1 to: currentIndex + conflicts size - 1) + detect: + [:i | + | nextItem | + ((nextItem := conflicts atWrap: i) isKindOf: MCConflict) + and: [nextItem isResolved not]] + ifNone: [0]. + nextUnresolvedIndex = 0 + ifTrue: [items size > 1 ifTrue: [self selection: (aMorph getCurrentSelectionIndex max: conflicts size) - conflicts size \\ items size + conflicts size + 1]] + ifFalse: [self selection: nextUnresolvedIndex - 1 \\ conflicts size + 1].].! Item was changed: ----- Method: MCMergeBrowser>>conflictSelectionDo: (in category 'as yet unclassified') ----- conflictSelectionDo: aBlock self selectionIsConflicted + ifTrue: aBlock! - ifTrue: aBlock - ifFalse: [self inform: 'You must have a conflict selected']! Item was changed: ----- Method: MCMergeBrowser>>innerButtonRow (in category 'as yet unclassified') ----- innerButtonRow ^ self buttonRow: + #((Keep chooseRemote 'keep the selected change' ) + (Reject chooseLocal 'reject the selected change' ))! - #((Keep chooseRemote 'keep the selected change' selectionIsConflicted) - (Reject chooseLocal 'reject the selected change' selectionIsConflicted))! Item was changed: ----- Method: MCMergeBrowser>>chooseRemote (in category 'as yet unclassified') ----- chooseRemote self conflictSelectionDo: [selection chooseRemote. + self changed: #text; changed: #list]. + self selectNextUnresolvedConflict! - self changed: #text; changed: #list]! Item was changed: ----- Method: MCMergeBrowser>>chooseLocal (in category 'as yet unclassified') ----- chooseLocal self conflictSelectionDo: [selection chooseLocal. + self changed: #text; changed: #list]. + self selectNextUnresolvedConflict! - self changed: #text; changed: #list]! |
On 9/6/2010 9:16 PM, [hidden email] wrote:
> A new version of Monticello was added to project The Inbox: > http://source.squeak.org/inbox/Monticello-nice.399.mcz > > ==================== Summary ==================== > > Name: Monticello-nice.399 > Author: nice > Time: 6 September 2010, 11:16:24.627 pm > UUID: d0ada69a-e513-4b38-9b6b-f332b31f61fb > Ancestors: Monticello-ar.398 > > Feature 1: let Keep and Reject buttons select the next unresolved conflict in the list. > > Feature 2: if there is no more conflict in the list, let Keep and Reject select the next non conflict in the list. > > The first feature is powerfull for deciding fast without many keyboard/mouse motions. > It should be complemented by a shortcut key. > > The second feature is questionnable... That's why this version made a visit to the inbox afterall... FWIW, I see nothing controversial about this change. Unless I'm mistaken it doesn't do any harm, it merely advances through the changes which seems quite acceptable. Cheers, - Andreas |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |