The Inbox: ReleaseBuilder-cmm.105.mcz

> A new version of ReleaseBuilder was added to project The Inbox:
> http://source.squeak.org/inbox/ReleaseBuilder-cmm.105.mcz
>
> ==================== Summary ====================
>
> Name: ReleaseBuilder-cmm.105
> Author: cmm
> Time: 31 December 2013, 4:27:44.493 pm
> UUID: 0bae46e0-1d72-49c3-830c-5dc2fa2b4958
> Ancestors: ReleaseBuilder-cmm.104
>
> Please let all internal image work and modifications for building our releases be delegated to ReleaseBuilder.
>
> =============== Diff against ReleaseBuilder-cmm.104 ===============
>
> Item was changed:
>   ----- Method: ReleaseBuilder class>>prepareNewBuild: (in category 'scripts') -----
>   prepareNewBuild: anMCRepository
>         "ReleaseBuilderTrunk prepareNewBuild"
>         "Prepare everything that should be done for a new image build"
> +       MCMcmUpdater updateMissingPackages: true.
> +       MCMcmUpdater enableUpdatesForAllPackages.
> +       Workspace allInstances do: [ : each | each topView delete].

> On 31 December 2013 22:27,  <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> A new version of ReleaseBuilder was added to project The Inbox:
>> http://source.squeak.org/inbox/ReleaseBuilder-cmm.105.mcz
>>
>> ==================== Summary ====================
>>
>> Name: ReleaseBuilder-cmm.105
>> Author: cmm
>> Time: 31 December 2013, 4:27:44.493 pm
>> UUID: 0bae46e0-1d72-49c3-830c-5dc2fa2b4958
>> Ancestors: ReleaseBuilder-cmm.104
>>
>> Please let all internal image work and modifications for building our releases be delegated to ReleaseBuilder.
>>
>> =============== Diff against ReleaseBuilder-cmm.104 ===============
>>
>> Item was changed:
>>   ----- Method: ReleaseBuilder class>>prepareNewBuild: (in category 'scripts') -----
>>   prepareNewBuild: anMCRepository
>>         "ReleaseBuilderTrunk prepareNewBuild"
>>         "Prepare everything that should be done for a new image build"
>> +       MCMcmUpdater updateMissingPackages: true.
>> +       MCMcmUpdater enableUpdatesForAllPackages.
>> +       Workspace allInstances do: [ : each | each topView delete].
>
> Duly removed from squeak-ci's release.st.
>
>> +       MorphicProject initialize.
>
> Why? I guess to set the background from MorphicProject class >>
> #defaultBackgroundForm.

> On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> On 31 December 2013 22:27,  <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> A new version of ReleaseBuilder was added to project The Inbox:
>>> http://source.squeak.org/inbox/ReleaseBuilder-cmm.105.mcz
>>>
>>> ==================== Summary ====================
>>>
>>> Name: ReleaseBuilder-cmm.105
>>> Author: cmm
>>> Time: 31 December 2013, 4:27:44.493 pm
>>> UUID: 0bae46e0-1d72-49c3-830c-5dc2fa2b4958
>>> Ancestors: ReleaseBuilder-cmm.104
>>>
>>> Please let all internal image work and modifications for building our releases be delegated to ReleaseBuilder.
>>>
>>> =============== Diff against ReleaseBuilder-cmm.104 ===============
>>>
>>> Item was changed:
>>>   ----- Method: ReleaseBuilder class>>prepareNewBuild: (in category 'scripts') -----
>>>   prepareNewBuild: anMCRepository
>>>         "ReleaseBuilderTrunk prepareNewBuild"
>>>         "Prepare everything that should be done for a new image build"
>>> +       MCMcmUpdater updateMissingPackages: true.
>>> +       MCMcmUpdater enableUpdatesForAllPackages.
>>> +       Workspace allInstances do: [ : each | each topView delete].
>>
>> Duly removed from squeak-ci's release.st.
>>
>>> +       MorphicProject initialize.
>>
>> Why? I guess to set the background from MorphicProject class >>
>> #defaultBackgroundForm.
>
> Yes.
>
>> Why store an image in a string inside the
>> image?
>
> Well, this is a separate discussion which Nicolas also recently asked.
>  Background and icon data represented in big String literals is
> nothing new and everyone recognizes its an undesirable redundancy;
> something we should talk about eliminating in 4.6.

> On 31 December 2013 23:49, Chris Muller <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> On 31 December 2013 22:27,  <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>> A new version of ReleaseBuilder was added to project The Inbox:
>>>> http://source.squeak.org/inbox/ReleaseBuilder-cmm.105.mcz
>>>>
>>>> ==================== Summary ====================
>>>>
>>>> Name: ReleaseBuilder-cmm.105
>>>> Author: cmm
>>>> Time: 31 December 2013, 4:27:44.493 pm
>>>> UUID: 0bae46e0-1d72-49c3-830c-5dc2fa2b4958
>>>> Ancestors: ReleaseBuilder-cmm.104
>>>>
>>>> Please let all internal image work and modifications for building our releases be delegated to ReleaseBuilder.
>>>>
>>>> =============== Diff against ReleaseBuilder-cmm.104 ===============
>>>>
>>>> Item was changed:
>>>>   ----- Method: ReleaseBuilder class>>prepareNewBuild: (in category 'scripts') -----
>>>>   prepareNewBuild: anMCRepository
>>>>         "ReleaseBuilderTrunk prepareNewBuild"
>>>>         "Prepare everything that should be done for a new image build"
>>>> +       MCMcmUpdater updateMissingPackages: true.
>>>> +       MCMcmUpdater enableUpdatesForAllPackages.
>>>> +       Workspace allInstances do: [ : each | each topView delete].
>>>
>>> Duly removed from squeak-ci's release.st.
>>>
>>>> +       MorphicProject initialize.
>>>
>>> Why? I guess to set the background from MorphicProject class >>
>>> #defaultBackgroundForm.
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>>> Why store an image in a string inside the
>>> image?
>>
>> Well, this is a separate discussion which Nicolas also recently asked.
>>  Background and icon data represented in big String literals is
>> nothing new and everyone recognizes its an undesirable redundancy;
>> something we should talk about eliminating in 4.6.
>
> Fair enough. I was also thinking of Nicolas' experiences.
>
>> Let's just stay with the old way for 4.5 so we can get it done and
>> everyone can see where the release background comes from.  Notice I've
>> at least refreshed the form with one that is a lot smaller than the
>> old one.
>
> Well, it's your release to manage, so it's up to you as to how exactly
> you want to run things. I suppose I'm just a bit miffed that you're
> not using the process I spent time developing.
>
>>> It looks like you're jumping through hoops just to avoid
>>> touching anything outside the image.
>>
>> No.
>
> OK.