Nicolas Cellier uploaded a new version of ST80 to project The Trunk:
http://source.squeak.org/trunk/ST80-nice.220.mcz ==================== Summary ==================== Name: ST80-nice.220 Author: nice Time: 27 October 2016, 2:43:25.251747 am UUID: e617501e-764e-4c9c-8c0c-a2a559e84940 Ancestors: ST80-tfel.219 Remove an old Transcript show: remnant from horrorful text selection debug session. =============== Diff against ST80-tfel.219 =============== Item was changed: ----- Method: CharacterBlockScannerForMVC>>crossedX (in category 'stop conditions') ----- crossedX characterIndex == nil ifFalse: [ "If the last character of the last line is a space, and it crosses the right margin, then locating the character block after it is impossible without this hack." + characterIndex > text size ifTrue: [ - characterIndex > text size ifTrue: [Transcript cr; show:'here'. lastIndex := characterIndex. characterPoint := (nextLeftMargin ifNil: [leftMargin]) @ (destY + line lineHeight). ^true]]. ^super crossedX! |
Should the comment be changed here? Or is it still a hack ? Best, Karl On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 2:43 AM, <[hidden email]> wrote: Nicolas Cellier uploaded a new version of ST80 to project The Trunk: |
Hi Karl, Hack sounds like a good name to me. You can't imagine what a nest of stateful twisted tricky code modified during 30 years I had to patiently untangle... But it's very hard to remember all the details 3 years after... Fortunately, we have an electronic memory to assist us: If I dig thru the [The Trunk] commits threads in the mailing list it seems that on 2 October 2013: - the hack was already named "hack" before Graphics-nice.243.mcz - it was in generic code (for both Morphic/ST80) but dedicated to ST80 only - so I ported it back to a ST80 specific scanner in ST80-nice.152.mcz So, despite my initials and my opinion, the name "hack" here is not my own production, just a copy/paste ;) Now that trunk MC server also has a longer memory, you can see the text already present in CharacterBlockcanner>>crossedX version ar 12/15/2001. And I would not be much surprised that most code in this area comes from Xerox era, and Dan Ingalls himself. 2016-10-27 11:04 GMT+02:00 karl ramberg <[hidden email]>:
|
OK :-) Some of the layout stuff is really painful to debug Best, Karl On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:04 PM, Nicolas Cellier <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
> On 27-10-2016, at 2:30 PM, karl ramberg <[hidden email]> wrote: > > OK :-) > Some of the layout stuff is really painful to debug This turns out to be incorrect. In fact *all* that layout stuff is really painful to debug. tim -- tim Rowledge; [hidden email]; http://www.rowledge.org/tim Strange OpCodes: BFM: Branch on Full Moon |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |