The Trunk: SUnit-ul.88.mcz
Locked
 
|
Levente Uzonyi uploaded a new version of SUnit to project The Trunk:
http://source.squeak.org/trunk/SUnit-ul.88.mcz ==================== Summary ==================== Name: SUnit-ul.88 Author: ul Time: 5 September 2012, 2:45:07.645 am UUID: 37ee1c27-eaf6-8948-acfe-2f35416248b9 Ancestors: SUnit-fbs.87 - release the created classes in ClassFactoryForTestCase >> #cleanUp =============== Diff against SUnit-fbs.87 =============== Item was changed: ----- Method: ClassFactoryForTestCase>>cleanUp (in category 'cleaning') ----- cleanUp | createdClassNames | createdClassNames := self createdClassNames. self deleteClasses. self deletePackage. + self cleanUpChangeSetForClassNames: createdClassNames. + self createdClasses: IdentitySet new! - self cleanUpChangeSetForClassNames: createdClassNames! |
Re: The Trunk: SUnit-ul.88.mcz
|
|
On 5 September 2012 01:56, <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Levente Uzonyi uploaded a new version of SUnit to project The Trunk: > http://source.squeak.org/trunk/SUnit-ul.88.mcz > > ==================== Summary ==================== > > Name: SUnit-ul.88 > Author: ul > Time: 5 September 2012, 2:45:07.645 am > UUID: 37ee1c27-eaf6-8948-acfe-2f35416248b9 > Ancestors: SUnit-fbs.87 > > - release the created classes in ClassFactoryForTestCase >> #cleanUp > > =============== Diff against SUnit-fbs.87 =============== This is enormously more useful. Thanks! Sample output: Error Message AnObsoleteMCMockClassA, AnObsoleteMCMockASubclass, AnObsoleteMCMockClassB, AnObsoleteMCMockClassD, AnObsoleteMCMockClassE, AnObsoleteMCMockClassF, AnObsoleteMCMockClassG, AnObsoleteMCMockClassH and AnObsoleteMCMockClassI are obsolete Stacktrace ReleaseTest(TestCase)>>assert:description: ReleaseTest>>testNoObsoleteClasses ReleaseTest(TestCase)>>performTest frank |
Re: The Trunk: SUnit-ul.88.mcz
|
|
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Frank Shearar wrote:
> On 5 September 2012 01:56, <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Levente Uzonyi uploaded a new version of SUnit to project The Trunk: >> http://source.squeak.org/trunk/SUnit-ul.88.mcz >> >> ==================== Summary ==================== >> >> Name: SUnit-ul.88 >> Author: ul >> Time: 5 September 2012, 2:45:07.645 am >> UUID: 37ee1c27-eaf6-8948-acfe-2f35416248b9 >> Ancestors: SUnit-fbs.87 >> >> - release the created classes in ClassFactoryForTestCase >> #cleanUp >> >> =============== Diff against SUnit-fbs.87 =============== > > This is enormously more useful. Thanks! That was the goal. Now we know, that #testUndeclared [1] is failing because of the extra stuff loaded for the CI. And #testNoObsoleteClasses [2] is failing because of MC tests. Btw, the latter doesn't fail on windows. Levente [1] http://www.squeakci.org/job/SqueakTrunk/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/Tests.Release/ReleaseTest/testUndeclared/ [2] http://www.squeakci.org/job/SqueakTrunk/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/Tests.Release/ReleaseTest/testNoObsoleteClasses/ > > Sample output: > > Error Message > > AnObsoleteMCMockClassA, AnObsoleteMCMockASubclass, > AnObsoleteMCMockClassB, AnObsoleteMCMockClassD, > AnObsoleteMCMockClassE, AnObsoleteMCMockClassF, > AnObsoleteMCMockClassG, AnObsoleteMCMockClassH and > AnObsoleteMCMockClassI are obsolete > Stacktrace > > ReleaseTest(TestCase)>>assert:description: > ReleaseTest>>testNoObsoleteClasses > ReleaseTest(TestCase)>>performTest > > frank > > |
Re: The Trunk: SUnit-ul.88.mcz
|
|
On 5 September 2012 13:49, Levente Uzonyi <[hidden email]> wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Frank Shearar wrote: > >> On 5 September 2012 01:56, <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> Levente Uzonyi uploaded a new version of SUnit to project The Trunk: >>> http://source.squeak.org/trunk/SUnit-ul.88.mcz >>> >>> ==================== Summary ==================== >>> >>> Name: SUnit-ul.88 >>> Author: ul >>> Time: 5 September 2012, 2:45:07.645 am >>> UUID: 37ee1c27-eaf6-8948-acfe-2f35416248b9 >>> Ancestors: SUnit-fbs.87 >>> >>> - release the created classes in ClassFactoryForTestCase >> #cleanUp >>> >>> =============== Diff against SUnit-fbs.87 =============== >> >> >> This is enormously more useful. Thanks! > > > That was the goal. Now we know, that #testUndeclared [1] is failing because > of the extra stuff loaded for the CI. And #testNoObsoleteClasses [2] is > failing because of MC tests. Btw, the latter doesn't fail on windows. Yes. We (I) can solve that in one of two ways: hack out the dependencies in HudsonBuildTools.st, or port it and install it properly. But at least that means that the test itself is OK, which is great. That's a bit strange, that #testNoObsoleteClasses doesn't fail on Windows. It must be a VM difference then, surely? frank > Levente > > [1] > http://www.squeakci.org/job/SqueakTrunk/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/Tests.Release/ReleaseTest/testUndeclared/ > [2] > http://www.squeakci.org/job/SqueakTrunk/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/Tests.Release/ReleaseTest/testNoObsoleteClasses/ > > >> >> Sample output: >> >> Error Message >> >> AnObsoleteMCMockClassA, AnObsoleteMCMockASubclass, >> AnObsoleteMCMockClassB, AnObsoleteMCMockClassD, >> AnObsoleteMCMockClassE, AnObsoleteMCMockClassF, >> AnObsoleteMCMockClassG, AnObsoleteMCMockClassH and >> AnObsoleteMCMockClassI are obsolete >> Stacktrace >> >> ReleaseTest(TestCase)>>assert:description: >> ReleaseTest>>testNoObsoleteClasses >> ReleaseTest(TestCase)>>performTest >> >> frank >> >> > |
Re: The Trunk: SUnit-ul.88.mcz
|
|
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Frank Shearar wrote:
> On 5 September 2012 13:49, Levente Uzonyi <[hidden email]> wrote: >> On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Frank Shearar wrote: >> >>> On 5 September 2012 01:56, <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Levente Uzonyi uploaded a new version of SUnit to project The Trunk: >>>> http://source.squeak.org/trunk/SUnit-ul.88.mcz >>>> >>>> ==================== Summary ==================== >>>> >>>> Name: SUnit-ul.88 >>>> Author: ul >>>> Time: 5 September 2012, 2:45:07.645 am >>>> UUID: 37ee1c27-eaf6-8948-acfe-2f35416248b9 >>>> Ancestors: SUnit-fbs.87 >>>> >>>> - release the created classes in ClassFactoryForTestCase >> #cleanUp >>>> >>>> =============== Diff against SUnit-fbs.87 =============== >>> >>> >>> This is enormously more useful. Thanks! >> >> >> That was the goal. Now we know, that #testUndeclared [1] is failing because >> of the extra stuff loaded for the CI. And #testNoObsoleteClasses [2] is >> failing because of MC tests. Btw, the latter doesn't fail on windows. > > Yes. We (I) can solve that in one of two ways: hack out the > dependencies in HudsonBuildTools.st, or port it and install it > properly. But at least that means that the test itself is OK, which is > great. > > That's a bit strange, that #testNoObsoleteClasses doesn't fail on > Windows. It must be a VM difference then, surely? I don't think so. It would be good to save the image after running the tests if there are failing ones, so we could have a chance to see what's holding references to those classes in this case. Levente > > frank > >> Levente >> >> [1] >> http://www.squeakci.org/job/SqueakTrunk/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/Tests.Release/ReleaseTest/testUndeclared/ >> [2] >> http://www.squeakci.org/job/SqueakTrunk/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/Tests.Release/ReleaseTest/testNoObsoleteClasses/ >> >> >>> >>> Sample output: >>> >>> Error Message >>> >>> AnObsoleteMCMockClassA, AnObsoleteMCMockASubclass, >>> AnObsoleteMCMockClassB, AnObsoleteMCMockClassD, >>> AnObsoleteMCMockClassE, AnObsoleteMCMockClassF, >>> AnObsoleteMCMockClassG, AnObsoleteMCMockClassH and >>> AnObsoleteMCMockClassI are obsolete >>> Stacktrace >>> >>> ReleaseTest(TestCase)>>assert:description: >>> ReleaseTest>>testNoObsoleteClasses >>> ReleaseTest(TestCase)>>performTest >>> >>> frank >>> >>> >> > > |
Re: The Trunk: SUnit-ul.88.mcz
|
|
On 5 September 2012 14:49, Levente Uzonyi <[hidden email]> wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Frank Shearar wrote: > >> On 5 September 2012 13:49, Levente Uzonyi <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Frank Shearar wrote: >>> >>>> On 5 September 2012 01:56, <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Levente Uzonyi uploaded a new version of SUnit to project The Trunk: >>>>> http://source.squeak.org/trunk/SUnit-ul.88.mcz >>>>> >>>>> ==================== Summary ==================== >>>>> >>>>> Name: SUnit-ul.88 >>>>> Author: ul >>>>> Time: 5 September 2012, 2:45:07.645 am >>>>> UUID: 37ee1c27-eaf6-8948-acfe-2f35416248b9 >>>>> Ancestors: SUnit-fbs.87 >>>>> >>>>> - release the created classes in ClassFactoryForTestCase >> #cleanUp >>>>> >>>>> =============== Diff against SUnit-fbs.87 =============== >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> This is enormously more useful. Thanks! >>> >>> >>> >>> That was the goal. Now we know, that #testUndeclared [1] is failing >>> because >>> of the extra stuff loaded for the CI. And #testNoObsoleteClasses [2] is >>> failing because of MC tests. Btw, the latter doesn't fail on windows. >> >> >> Yes. We (I) can solve that in one of two ways: hack out the >> dependencies in HudsonBuildTools.st, or port it and install it >> properly. But at least that means that the test itself is OK, which is >> great. >> >> That's a bit strange, that #testNoObsoleteClasses doesn't fail on >> Windows. It must be a VM difference then, surely? > > > I don't think so. It would be good to save the image after running the tests > if there are failing ones, so we could have a chance to see what's holding > references to those classes in this case. Hang on though: the CI tests don't run from a TestRunner but from the hackported HudsonBuildTools.st. That's a big difference there. frank > Levente > > >> >> frank >> >>> Levente >>> >>> [1] >>> >>> http://www.squeakci.org/job/SqueakTrunk/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/Tests.Release/ReleaseTest/testUndeclared/ >>> [2] >>> >>> http://www.squeakci.org/job/SqueakTrunk/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/Tests.Release/ReleaseTest/testNoObsoleteClasses/ >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Sample output: >>>> >>>> Error Message >>>> >>>> AnObsoleteMCMockClassA, AnObsoleteMCMockASubclass, >>>> AnObsoleteMCMockClassB, AnObsoleteMCMockClassD, >>>> AnObsoleteMCMockClassE, AnObsoleteMCMockClassF, >>>> AnObsoleteMCMockClassG, AnObsoleteMCMockClassH and >>>> AnObsoleteMCMockClassI are obsolete >>>> Stacktrace >>>> >>>> ReleaseTest(TestCase)>>assert:description: >>>> ReleaseTest>>testNoObsoleteClasses >>>> ReleaseTest(TestCase)>>performTest >>>> >>>> frank >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > |
Re: The Trunk: SUnit-ul.88.mcz
|
|
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Frank Shearar wrote:
> On 5 September 2012 14:49, Levente Uzonyi <[hidden email]> wrote: >> On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Frank Shearar wrote: >> >>> On 5 September 2012 13:49, Levente Uzonyi <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Frank Shearar wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 5 September 2012 01:56, <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Levente Uzonyi uploaded a new version of SUnit to project The Trunk: >>>>>> http://source.squeak.org/trunk/SUnit-ul.88.mcz >>>>>> >>>>>> ==================== Summary ==================== >>>>>> >>>>>> Name: SUnit-ul.88 >>>>>> Author: ul >>>>>> Time: 5 September 2012, 2:45:07.645 am >>>>>> UUID: 37ee1c27-eaf6-8948-acfe-2f35416248b9 >>>>>> Ancestors: SUnit-fbs.87 >>>>>> >>>>>> - release the created classes in ClassFactoryForTestCase >> #cleanUp >>>>>> >>>>>> =============== Diff against SUnit-fbs.87 =============== >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This is enormously more useful. Thanks! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> That was the goal. Now we know, that #testUndeclared [1] is failing >>>> because >>>> of the extra stuff loaded for the CI. And #testNoObsoleteClasses [2] is >>>> failing because of MC tests. Btw, the latter doesn't fail on windows. >>> >>> >>> Yes. We (I) can solve that in one of two ways: hack out the >>> dependencies in HudsonBuildTools.st, or port it and install it >>> properly. But at least that means that the test itself is OK, which is >>> great. >>> >>> That's a bit strange, that #testNoObsoleteClasses doesn't fail on >>> Windows. It must be a VM difference then, surely? >> >> >> I don't think so. It would be good to save the image after running the tests >> if there are failing ones, so we could have a chance to see what's holding >> references to those classes in this case. > > Hang on though: the CI tests don't run from a TestRunner but from the > hackported HudsonBuildTools.st. That's a big difference there. The TestResult object holds the reference to all the TestCase instances. I'm sure that script uses TestResult too. Levente > > frank > >> Levente >> >> >>> >>> frank >>> >>>> Levente >>>> >>>> [1] >>>> >>>> http://www.squeakci.org/job/SqueakTrunk/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/Tests.Release/ReleaseTest/testUndeclared/ >>>> [2] >>>> >>>> http://www.squeakci.org/job/SqueakTrunk/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/Tests.Release/ReleaseTest/testNoObsoleteClasses/ >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sample output: >>>>> >>>>> Error Message >>>>> >>>>> AnObsoleteMCMockClassA, AnObsoleteMCMockASubclass, >>>>> AnObsoleteMCMockClassB, AnObsoleteMCMockClassD, >>>>> AnObsoleteMCMockClassE, AnObsoleteMCMockClassF, >>>>> AnObsoleteMCMockClassG, AnObsoleteMCMockClassH and >>>>> AnObsoleteMCMockClassI are obsolete >>>>> Stacktrace >>>>> >>>>> ReleaseTest(TestCase)>>assert:description: >>>>> ReleaseTest>>testNoObsoleteClasses >>>>> ReleaseTest(TestCase)>>performTest >>>>> >>>>> frank >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > > |
«
Return to Squeak - Dev
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |