Dear Squeakers,
welcome to the Easter edition of The WeeklySqueakSummary, an irregular traffic-dependent report on what's going on in the world of Squeak based on the WeeklySqueak blog. Highlights of the past weeks: There is a whole bunch of very interesting (not just software) releases... Squeak 3.10 [23], Sophie 1.0 [24], a multi-threaded Squeak VM called Hydra [14], the Squeak by Example book's second edition (nowadays, people tend to call such things 2.0 or the like... I prefer to stick with the old-fashioned word "edition") [19], and a very extensive book covering the (much more relevant than you might think) topic of hashing [15]. The Squeak Foundation has a new board [17] - congratulations to all board members (and to the community for their choices)! Last time, I accidentally posted a "link" to a demo video of the Lively kernel - it was just a link to an announcement. This happens if you don't read carefully. :-) The actual video has since been released [20]. Two notifications of acceptance: there will be more Google Summer of Code projects related to Squeak [22], and the Squeak VM is now officially deemed open source by the Debian maintainers [21]. That last topic (licensing issues) directly relates to the last "hot" topic: the Software Freedom Law Center has released a guide to legal issues as occurring in the context of open-source projects [11]. It's an interesting read, but unfortunately very much focused on the legal situation in the United States of America - well, you probably can't blame them. The past weeks' news items: [1] Qwaq is Hiring! http://news.squeak.org/2008/01/16/qwaq-is-hiring/ [2] Squeak now running on Nokia N810 http://news.squeak.org/2008/01/18/squeak-now-running-on-nokia-n810/ [3] Self-Sustaining Systems *Call for Papers* http://news.squeak.org/2008/01/21/self-sustaining-systems-call-for-papers/ [4] Brought to you by ESUG! http://news.squeak.org/2008/01/23/brought-to-you-by-esug/ [5] Dynamic Languages Symposium (DLS) 2008 - Call For Papers http://news.squeak.org/2008/01/25/dynamic-languages-symposium-dls-2008-call-for-papers/ [6] Learn Smalltalk And See the World! http://news.squeak.org/2008/01/26/learn-smalltalk-and-see-the-world/ [7] Immersive Education Summit Ad-Hoc Meeting http://news.squeak.org/2008/02/03/immersive-education-summit-ad-hoc-meeting/ [8] The Golight: Tool Support for Test-Driven Development http://news.squeak.org/2008/02/07/the-golight-tool-support-for-test-driven-development/ [9] XO in the US Virgin Islands http://news.squeak.org/2008/02/12/xo-in-the-us-virgin-islands/ [10] 16th International Smalltalk Joint Conference *Call for Contributions* http://news.squeak.org/2008/02/14/16th-international-smalltalk-joint-conference-call-for-contributions/ [11] IANAL - But they are! SFLC Guide to FOSS Legal Issues http://news.squeak.org/2008/02/15/ianal-but-they-are-sflc-guide-to-foss-legal-issues/ [12] International Squeak Live Video Conference Between Nepal and Japan http://news.squeak.org/2008/02/17/international-squeak-live-video-conference-between-nepal-and-japan/ [13] Randal Schwartz Talks With Leo about Squeak, EToys and OLPC http://news.squeak.org/2008/02/20/randal-schwartz-talks-with-leo-about-squeak-etoys-and-olpc/ [14] Qwaq releases Hydra multi-core Squeak VM http://news.squeak.org/2008/02/21/qwaq-releases-hydra-multi-core-squeak-vm/ [15] Hashing in Smalltalk http://news.squeak.org/2008/02/25/hashing-in-smalltalk/ [16] Don't forget to vote! http://news.squeak.org/2008/03/06/dont-forget-to-vote/ [17] The Squeak Foundation Board 2008 http://news.squeak.org/2008/03/09/the-squeak-foundation-board-2008/ [18] Talk on "Newspeak" today http://news.squeak.org/2008/03/11/talk-on-newspeak-today/ [19] Squeak by Example, 2.0! http://news.squeak.org/2008/03/12/squeak-by-example-20/ [20] Dan Ingalls demos Lively at Google http://news.squeak.org/2008/03/14/dan-ingalls-demos-lively-at-google/ [21] Squeak VM now in Debian distro http://news.squeak.org/2008/03/17/squeak-vm-now-in-debian-distro/ [22] Squeak accepted into Google Summer of Code 08 http://news.squeak.org/2008/03/18/squeak-accepted-into-google-summer-of-code-08/ [23] Squeak 3.10 now released! http://news.squeak.org/2008/03/21/380/ [24] Sophie multimedia authoring environment hits 1.0 http://news.squeak.org/2008/03/22/sophie-multimedia-authoring-environment-hits-10/ You can find this and much more on The WeeklySqueak blog, the newsblog dedicated to the world of Squeak:http://news.squeak.org/ Subscribe to the WeeklySqueak RSS feed: http://news.squeak.org/feed/ Happy squeaking, Michael _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
Sorry but this is the Seaside mailing list, not squeak-dev.
Cheers Philippe 2008/3/24, Michael Haupt <[hidden email]>: > Dear Squeakers, > > welcome to the Easter edition of The WeeklySqueakSummary, an irregular > traffic-dependent report on what's going on in the world of Squeak > based on the WeeklySqueak blog. > > Highlights of the past weeks: > > There is a whole bunch of very interesting (not just software) > releases... Squeak 3.10 [23], Sophie 1.0 [24], a multi-threaded Squeak > VM called Hydra [14], the Squeak by Example book's second edition > (nowadays, people tend to call such things 2.0 or the like... I prefer > to stick with the old-fashioned word "edition") [19], and a very > extensive book covering the (much more relevant than you might think) > topic of hashing [15]. > > The Squeak Foundation has a new board [17] - congratulations to all > board members (and to the community for their choices)! > > Last time, I accidentally posted a "link" to a demo video of the > Lively kernel - it was just a link to an announcement. This happens if > you don't read carefully. :-) The actual video has since been released > [20]. > > Two notifications of acceptance: there will be more Google Summer of > Code projects related to Squeak [22], and the Squeak VM is now > officially deemed open source by the Debian maintainers [21]. > > That last topic (licensing issues) directly relates to the last "hot" > topic: the Software Freedom Law Center has released a guide to legal > issues as occurring in the context of open-source projects [11]. It's > an interesting read, but unfortunately very much focused on the legal > situation in the United States of America - well, you probably can't > blame them. > > The past weeks' news items: > > [1] Qwaq is Hiring! > http://news.squeak.org/2008/01/16/qwaq-is-hiring/ > > [2] Squeak now running on Nokia N810 > http://news.squeak.org/2008/01/18/squeak-now-running-on-nokia-n810/ > > [3] Self-Sustaining Systems *Call for Papers* > http://news.squeak.org/2008/01/21/self-sustaining-systems-call-for-papers/ > > [4] Brought to you by ESUG! > http://news.squeak.org/2008/01/23/brought-to-you-by-esug/ > > [5] Dynamic Languages Symposium (DLS) 2008 - Call For Papers > http://news.squeak.org/2008/01/25/dynamic-languages-symposium-dls-2008-call-for-papers/ > > [6] Learn Smalltalk And See the World! > http://news.squeak.org/2008/01/26/learn-smalltalk-and-see-the-world/ > > [7] Immersive Education Summit Ad-Hoc Meeting > http://news.squeak.org/2008/02/03/immersive-education-summit-ad-hoc-meeting/ > > [8] The Golight: Tool Support for Test-Driven Development > http://news.squeak.org/2008/02/07/the-golight-tool-support-for-test-driven-development/ > > [9] XO in the US Virgin Islands > http://news.squeak.org/2008/02/12/xo-in-the-us-virgin-islands/ > > [10] 16th International Smalltalk Joint Conference *Call for Contributions* > http://news.squeak.org/2008/02/14/16th-international-smalltalk-joint-conference-call-for-contributions/ > > [11] IANAL - But they are! SFLC Guide to FOSS Legal Issues > http://news.squeak.org/2008/02/15/ianal-but-they-are-sflc-guide-to-foss-legal-issues/ > > [12] International Squeak Live Video Conference Between Nepal and Japan > http://news.squeak.org/2008/02/17/international-squeak-live-video-conference-between-nepal-and-japan/ > > [13] Randal Schwartz Talks With Leo about Squeak, EToys and OLPC > http://news.squeak.org/2008/02/20/randal-schwartz-talks-with-leo-about-squeak-etoys-and-olpc/ > > [14] Qwaq releases Hydra multi-core Squeak VM > http://news.squeak.org/2008/02/21/qwaq-releases-hydra-multi-core-squeak-vm/ > > [15] Hashing in Smalltalk > http://news.squeak.org/2008/02/25/hashing-in-smalltalk/ > > [16] Don't forget to vote! > http://news.squeak.org/2008/03/06/dont-forget-to-vote/ > > [17] The Squeak Foundation Board 2008 > http://news.squeak.org/2008/03/09/the-squeak-foundation-board-2008/ > > [18] Talk on "Newspeak" today > http://news.squeak.org/2008/03/11/talk-on-newspeak-today/ > > [19] Squeak by Example, 2.0! > http://news.squeak.org/2008/03/12/squeak-by-example-20/ > > [20] Dan Ingalls demos Lively at Google > http://news.squeak.org/2008/03/14/dan-ingalls-demos-lively-at-google/ > > [21] Squeak VM now in Debian distro > http://news.squeak.org/2008/03/17/squeak-vm-now-in-debian-distro/ > > [22] Squeak accepted into Google Summer of Code 08 > http://news.squeak.org/2008/03/18/squeak-accepted-into-google-summer-of-code-08/ > > [23] Squeak 3.10 now released! > http://news.squeak.org/2008/03/21/380/ > > [24] Sophie multimedia authoring environment hits 1.0 > http://news.squeak.org/2008/03/22/sophie-multimedia-authoring-environment-hits-10/ > > You can find this and much more on The WeeklySqueak blog, the newsblog > dedicated to the world of Squeak:http://news.squeak.org/ > > Subscribe to the WeeklySqueak RSS feed: http://news.squeak.org/feed/ > > Happy squeaking, > > Michael > _______________________________________________ > seaside mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside > seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
Hi Philippe,
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Philippe Marschall <[hidden email]> wrote: > Sorry but this is the Seaside mailing list, not squeak-dev. that Weekly Squeak Summary e-mail was sent to the following lists: announcements, beginners, seaside, and squeak-dev. Just like all before. ;-) The News team agreed on this bunch of lists when the Summary was kicked off. Best, Michael _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
2008/3/24, Michael Haupt <[hidden email]>:
> Hi Philippe, > > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Philippe Marschall > <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Sorry but this is the Seaside mailing list, not squeak-dev. > > > that Weekly Squeak Summary e-mail was sent to the following lists: > announcements, beginners, seaside, and squeak-dev. Just like all > before. ;-) > > The News team agreed on this bunch of lists when the Summary was kicked off. Very well but the news team does not run this list. We would appreciate it if we could keep the mails on this list about Seaside. People with an interest in Squeak can subscribe one of the mentioned lists or read the Weekly Squeak. Cheers Philippe _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
Philippe,
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Philippe Marschall <[hidden email]> wrote: > Very well but the news team does not run this list. We would > appreciate it if we could keep the mails on this list about Seaside. > People with an interest in Squeak can subscribe one of the mentioned > lists or read the Weekly Squeak. I presume there is a valid reason for such an exaggeratedly hostile reaction after sixteen Summary e-mails' having been posted without further ado. Who is "we", anyway? And why did no one complain earlier, if this appears to be so much of a content-wise offence? Be that as it may, the Seaside list shall no longer be bothered by yon Summaries, and, notwithstanding, thrive henceforth. :-) Best, Michael P.S.: There have been numerous Seaside-related news items in the previous 16 Summaries. Bah, whatever. _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
In reply to this post by Philippe Marschall
Philippe Marschall ha scritto:
> 2008/3/24, Michael Haupt <[hidden email]>: >> Hi Philippe, >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Philippe Marschall >> <[hidden email]> wrote: >> > Sorry but this is the Seaside mailing list, not squeak-dev. >> >> >> that Weekly Squeak Summary e-mail was sent to the following lists: >> announcements, beginners, seaside, and squeak-dev. Just like all >> before. ;-) >> >> The News team agreed on this bunch of lists when the Summary was kicked off. > > Very well but the news team does not run this list. We would > appreciate it if we could keep the mails on this list about Seaside. > People with an interest in Squeak can subscribe one of the mentioned > lists or read the Weekly Squeak. > Hi Philippe, the decision for sending this summaries to the Seaside list goes back to when Seaside was pretty much a Squeak-only framework. I remember asking the mantainer of this list (at the time, it was Avi) for permission to send the announcements. Noone ever complained before. Do people now feel that's not appropriate anymore? Ciao, Giovanni _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
I also don't know what the big fuss is about, there's a lot more noise
on the Squeak list than here, so let's address it when (and if) it actually becomes a problem IMO. -Boris -- +1.604.689.0322 DeepCove Labs Ltd. 4th floor 595 Howe Street Vancouver, Canada V6C 2T5 http://tinyurl.com/r7uw4 [hidden email] CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This email is intended only for the persons named in the message header. Unless otherwise indicated, it contains information that is private and confidential. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and delete the entire message including any attachments. Thank you. > -----Original Message----- > From: [hidden email] [mailto:seaside- > [hidden email]] On Behalf Of Giovanni Corriga > Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 3:02 PM > To: Seaside - general discussion > Subject: Re: [Seaside] The Weekly Squeak Summary No. 17: Jan 13 - Mar 22, > 2008 > > Philippe Marschall ha scritto: > > 2008/3/24, Michael Haupt <[hidden email]>: > >> Hi Philippe, > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Philippe Marschall > >> <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> > Sorry but this is the Seaside mailing list, not squeak-dev. > >> > >> > >> that Weekly Squeak Summary e-mail was sent to the following lists: > >> announcements, beginners, seaside, and squeak-dev. Just like all > >> before. ;-) > >> > >> The News team agreed on this bunch of lists when the Summary was > kicked off. > > > > Very well but the news team does not run this list. We would > > appreciate it if we could keep the mails on this list about Seaside. > > People with an interest in Squeak can subscribe one of the mentioned > > lists or read the Weekly Squeak. > > > > > Hi Philippe, > > the decision for sending this summaries to the Seaside list goes back > when Seaside was pretty much a Squeak-only framework. I remember asking > the mantainer of this list (at the time, it was Avi) for permission to > send the announcements. Noone ever complained before. Do people now feel > that's not appropriate anymore? > > Ciao, > > Giovanni > _______________________________________________ > seaside mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
In reply to this post by Giovanni Corriga
First of all let me say, that I really appreciate the "The Weekly
Squeak Summary". It is a valuable summary and I read it with great pleasure whenever it is posted. Thank you very much for providing these summaries! I am subscribed to all the 4 lists the summary is posted to (as well as to the rss stream). Personally I don't mind, as GMail obviously merges the duplicates. As Giovanni says, the Seaside mailing-list might not be the right platform, as this is not a Squeak-only community anymore. Personally I would like to keep Seaside as platform neutral as possible, even if the main development platform of Seaside is still Squeak and even if the mailing-list is currently hosted by the Squeak Foundation. I guess it would be the best to re-evaluate the decision to have "The Weekly Squeak Summary" posted here: - Are there any Squeaker subscribed, that are *not following* at least one of announcements, beginners, or squeak-dev mailing-lists? - Are there any VisualWorks, GemStone, Dolphin, GST, VST, Ambrai, ... that are *interested reading* "The Weekly Squeak Summary"? Cheers, Lukas -- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
> - Are there any VisualWorks, GemStone, Dolphin, GST, VST, Ambrai, ... > that are *interested reading* "The Weekly Squeak Summary"? > I am.. but I do it by reading lists about Squeak. I admire Phillipe's doggedness in all things Seaside only. It takes a special kind of person to pull off the role of community filterfish and without that role, things can get noisy, over debated, run around in circles chasing its own tail, et al. So all in all, I agree with Phillipe that this sort of announcement, while interesting, doesn't really fit on this list. It'd be like getting announcements about Croquet or VisualWorks dev builds because it's "all smalltalk and related". Cheers, Michael _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
Hi Michael,
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 11:30 PM, Michael Lucas-Smith <[hidden email]> wrote: > I admire Phillipe's doggedness in all things Seaside only. It takes a > special kind of person to pull off the role of community filterfish it does indeed. It would have been good to know earlier, though, that "the Seaside community" is not particularly interested in the Summaries. If there is no such interest for No. 17, what about the earlier ones? Why now, all of a sudden? Has "the community" come to that conclusion just recently? Why not responding to the News team directly, instead of starting an off-topic discussion on the Seaside list? These open and blunt "we don't want your stuff" posts really don't serve anyone. It's just the kind of noise that seems to be undesired. > So all in all, I agree with Phillipe that this sort of announcement, > while interesting, doesn't really fit on this list. It'd be like getting > announcements about Croquet or VisualWorks dev builds because it's "all > smalltalk and related". Let me quote myself: "There have been numerous Seaside-related news items in the previous 16 Summaries." I doubt that the Summaries are as off-topic as suggested. Is it futile to ask about that? Best, Michael _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
In reply to this post by Giovanni Corriga
Giovanni Corriga wrote:
> Philippe Marschall ha scritto: >> 2008/3/24, Michael Haupt <[hidden email]>: >>> Hi Philippe, >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Philippe Marschall >>> <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> > Sorry but this is the Seaside mailing list, not squeak-dev. >>> >>> >>> that Weekly Squeak Summary e-mail was sent to the following lists: >>> announcements, beginners, seaside, and squeak-dev. Just like all >>> before. ;-) >>> >>> The News team agreed on this bunch of lists when the Summary was >>> kicked off. >> >> Very well but the news team does not run this list. We would >> appreciate it if we could keep the mails on this list about Seaside. >> People with an interest in Squeak can subscribe one of the mentioned >> lists or read the Weekly Squeak. >> > > > Hi Philippe, > > the decision for sending this summaries to the Seaside list goes back to > when Seaside was pretty much a Squeak-only framework. I remember asking > the mantainer of this list (at the time, it was Avi) for permission to > send the announcements. Noone ever complained before. Do people now feel > that's not appropriate anymore? > I think that Seaside is an entry point to Smalltalk in general and to the Squeak world in particular. So, if people are comming to smalltalk by means of Seaside, this kind of messages can show the other *interesting* things that are part of the squeak world. We have to remember that Seaside is just a part of a bigger set of technologies and, the more people know about them, the better for us. It is very difficult already to convince *enterprises* to use alternatives to java/php/.net, but if we can reach a critical user base, as the ruby on rails did for ruby, we can have a better chance to bring this technologies to them. By not allowing the spread of information like the squeak new are trying to do, we are just working agaist this goal. So I vote to allow and to contribute to the spread information by this and another means. Cheers, Miguel Cobá > Ciao, > > Giovanni > _______________________________________________ > seaside mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside > _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
> From: Miguel Enrique Cobá Martínez
> > Giovanni Corriga wrote: > > Philippe Marschall ha scritto: > >> 2008/3/24, Michael Haupt <[hidden email]>: > >>> Hi Philippe, > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Philippe Marschall > >>> <[hidden email]> wrote: > >>> > Sorry but this is the Seaside mailing list, not squeak-dev. > >>> > >>> > >>> that Weekly Squeak Summary e-mail was sent to the following lists: > >>> announcements, beginners, seaside, and squeak-dev. Just like all > >>> before. ;-) > >>> > >>> The News team agreed on this bunch of lists when the Summary was > >>> kicked off. > >> > >> Very well but the news team does not run this list. We would > >> appreciate it if we could keep the mails on this list about Seaside. > >> People with an interest in Squeak can subscribe one of the mentioned > >> lists or read the Weekly Squeak. > >> > > > > > > Hi Philippe, > > > > the decision for sending this summaries to the Seaside list goes back to > > when Seaside was pretty much a Squeak-only framework. I remember asking > > the mantainer of this list (at the time, it was Avi) for permission to > > send the announcements. Noone ever complained before. Do people now feel > > that's not appropriate anymore? > > > Of course it is apropriate. > I think that Seaside is an entry point to Smalltalk in general and to > the Squeak world in particular. So, if people are comming to smalltalk > by means of Seaside, this kind of messages can show the other > *interesting* things that are part of the squeak world. We have to > remember that Seaside is just a part of a bigger set of technologies > and, the more people know about them, the better for us. > It is very difficult already to convince *enterprises* to use > alternatives to java/php/.net, but if we can reach a critical user base, > as the ruby on rails did for ruby, we can have a better chance to bring > this technologies to them. > By not allowing the spread of information like the squeak new are trying > to do, we are just working agaist this goal. > So I vote to allow and to contribute to the spread information by this > and another means. > > Cheers, > Miguel Cobá I'm glad somebody finally said something. I was just going to let this go figuring if nobody says anything than I guess it doesn't really matter. I was personally offended by Philippe comment. It is really hard for me to believe that after all the work I put into trying to keep Seaside in the news that this community would deny us the opportunity to promote the Weekly Squeak on the mailing list. I think that if Seaside doesn't value our promotion enough to help us in return, that's fine, we can just go away. Although I'm not the Team Lead anymore, so I really shouldn't be speaking for the team. Still I take this as a personal attack, and I am offended. Ron Teitelbaum News Team Member _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
In reply to this post by Miguel Enrique Cobá Martínez
Miguel Enrique Cobá Martínez wrote:
> Of course it is apropriate. > I think that Seaside is an entry point to Smalltalk in general and to > the Squeak world in particular. Not necessarily a squeak entry point, we use it with VisualWorks. Seaside is not Squeak even if it started there. As Michael pointed out earlier, should the Seaside list also carry release announcements about VW? Personally I don't particularly care one way or the other, especially if they're only once a week or less. It is interesting to find a summary of what areas are active. cheers Steve _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
Hi Steve,
We tried to cover more then just Squeak. We cover OLPC, Croquet, Sophie, SqueakLand. We post summaries on all those lists too. I've never had an email from Alan Kay asking me to stop bothering his list members. We are covering Gemstone and I think you will find that we cover VisualWorks too. http://news.squeak.org/?s=cincom Ron Teitelbaum Squeak News Team Member > -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Aldred > > Miguel Enrique Cobá Martínez wrote: > > Of course it is apropriate. > > I think that Seaside is an entry point to Smalltalk in general and to > > the Squeak world in particular. > > Not necessarily a squeak entry point, we use it with VisualWorks. > Seaside is not Squeak even if it started there. As Michael pointed out > earlier, should the Seaside list also carry release announcements about > VW? > > Personally I don't particularly care one way or the other, especially if > they're only once a week or less. It is interesting to find a summary of > what areas are active. > > cheers > Steve > > _______________________________________________ > seaside mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
In reply to this post by Ron Teitelbaum
2008/3/28, Ron Teitelbaum <[hidden email]>:
> > From: Miguel Enrique Cobá Martínez > > > > > Giovanni Corriga wrote: > > > Philippe Marschall ha scritto: > > >> 2008/3/24, Michael Haupt <[hidden email]>: > > >>> Hi Philippe, > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Philippe Marschall > > >>> <[hidden email]> wrote: > > >>> > Sorry but this is the Seaside mailing list, not squeak-dev. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> that Weekly Squeak Summary e-mail was sent to the following lists: > > >>> announcements, beginners, seaside, and squeak-dev. Just like all > > >>> before. ;-) > > >>> > > >>> The News team agreed on this bunch of lists when the Summary was > > >>> kicked off. > > >> > > >> Very well but the news team does not run this list. We would > > >> appreciate it if we could keep the mails on this list about Seaside. > > >> People with an interest in Squeak can subscribe one of the mentioned > > >> lists or read the Weekly Squeak. > > >> > > > > > > > > > Hi Philippe, > > > > > > the decision for sending this summaries to the Seaside list goes back to > > > when Seaside was pretty much a Squeak-only framework. I remember asking > > > the mantainer of this list (at the time, it was Avi) for permission to > > > send the announcements. Noone ever complained before. Do people now feel > > > that's not appropriate anymore? > > > > > Of course it is apropriate. > > I think that Seaside is an entry point to Smalltalk in general and to > > the Squeak world in particular. So, if people are comming to smalltalk > > by means of Seaside, this kind of messages can show the other > > *interesting* things that are part of the squeak world. We have to > > remember that Seaside is just a part of a bigger set of technologies > > and, the more people know about them, the better for us. > > It is very difficult already to convince *enterprises* to use > > alternatives to java/php/.net, but if we can reach a critical user base, > > as the ruby on rails did for ruby, we can have a better chance to bring > > this technologies to them. > > By not allowing the spread of information like the squeak new are trying > > to do, we are just working agaist this goal. > > So I vote to allow and to contribute to the spread information by this > > and another means. > > > > Cheers, > > Miguel Cobá > > > I'm glad somebody finally said something. I was just going to let this go > figuring if nobody says anything than I guess it doesn't really matter. > > I was personally offended by Philippe comment. It is really hard for me to > believe that after all the work I put into trying to keep Seaside in the > news that this community would deny us the opportunity to promote the Weekly > Squeak on the mailing list. > > I think that if Seaside doesn't value our promotion enough to help us in > return, that's fine, we can just go away. Although I'm not the Team Lead > anymore, so I really shouldn't be speaking for the team. Still I take this > as a personal attack, and I am offended. indeed I find the weekly Squeak of high quality, there is no need to be offended. The reason I wrote this mail to the list instead of the news team directly is that we can have a discussion in public and everyone who is interested can post his opinion. What made me write this mail is that to me: - Seaside is not about promoting Smalltalk - Seaside is not about the Squeak "environment" (EToys, Shopie, Croquet, Scratch, OLPC, SqueakLand, research project X, ...) to me Seaside is a web framework for Smalltalk who runs on Squeak. Period. Who ever is interested in the Weekly Squeak can read it directly or via RSS feed. If we have a weekly Squeak on this list, shouldn't we have a weekly Cincom Smalltalk, Dolphin Smalltalk, Gemstone Smalltalk and GNU Smalltalk as well? If we had all these would that still be appropriate? What's the reasoning for not posting on the Magma and Exupery lists as well? Or to make an other example. Would you find it appropriate if the Sun news team would post the weekly Java in the mailinglist of Tapestry? Cheers Philippe _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Philippe Marschall [mailto:[hidden email]] > Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 2:24 AM > To: [hidden email]; Seaside - general discussion > Subject: Re: [Seaside] The Weekly Squeak Summary No. 17: Jan 13 - Mar 22, > 2008 > > 2008/3/28, Ron Teitelbaum <[hidden email]>: > > > From: Miguel Enrique Cobá Martínez > > > > > > > > Giovanni Corriga wrote: > > > > Philippe Marschall ha scritto: > > > >> 2008/3/24, Michael Haupt <[hidden email]>: > > > >>> Hi Philippe, > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Philippe Marschall > > > >>> <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > >>> > Sorry but this is the Seaside mailing list, not squeak-dev. > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> that Weekly Squeak Summary e-mail was sent to the following > lists: > > > >>> announcements, beginners, seaside, and squeak-dev. Just like all > > > >>> before. ;-) > > > >>> > > > >>> The News team agreed on this bunch of lists when the Summary was > > > >>> kicked off. > > > >> > > > >> Very well but the news team does not run this list. We would > > > >> appreciate it if we could keep the mails on this list about > Seaside. > > > >> People with an interest in Squeak can subscribe one of the > mentioned > > > >> lists or read the Weekly Squeak. > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Philippe, > > > > > > > > the decision for sending this summaries to the Seaside list goes > back to > > > > when Seaside was pretty much a Squeak-only framework. I remember > asking > > > > the mantainer of this list (at the time, it was Avi) for permission > to > > > > send the announcements. Noone ever complained before. Do people now > feel > > > > that's not appropriate anymore? > > > > > > > Of course it is apropriate. > > > I think that Seaside is an entry point to Smalltalk in general and to > > > the Squeak world in particular. So, if people are comming to > smalltalk > > > by means of Seaside, this kind of messages can show the other > > > *interesting* things that are part of the squeak world. We have to > > > remember that Seaside is just a part of a bigger set of technologies > > > and, the more people know about them, the better for us. > > > It is very difficult already to convince *enterprises* to use > > > alternatives to java/php/.net, but if we can reach a critical user > base, > > > as the ruby on rails did for ruby, we can have a better chance to > bring > > > this technologies to them. > > > By not allowing the spread of information like the squeak new are > trying > > > to do, we are just working agaist this goal. > > > So I vote to allow and to contribute to the spread information by > this > > > and another means. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Miguel Cobá > > > > > > I'm glad somebody finally said something. I was just going to let this > go > > figuring if nobody says anything than I guess it doesn't really matter. > > > > I was personally offended by Philippe comment. It is really hard for > me to > > believe that after all the work I put into trying to keep Seaside in > the > > news that this community would deny us the opportunity to promote the > Weekly > > Squeak on the mailing list. > > > > I think that if Seaside doesn't value our promotion enough to help us > in > > return, that's fine, we can just go away. Although I'm not the Team > Lead > > anymore, so I really shouldn't be speaking for the team. Still I take > this > > as a personal attack, and I am offended. > > That was not intended to be a quality rating about about your work, > indeed I find the weekly Squeak of high quality, there is no need to > be offended. The reason I wrote this mail to the list instead of the > news team directly is that we can have a discussion in public and > everyone who is interested can post his opinion. > > What made me write this mail is that to me: > - Seaside is not about promoting Smalltalk > - Seaside is not about the Squeak "environment" (EToys, Shopie, > Croquet, Scratch, OLPC, SqueakLand, research project X, ...) > to me Seaside is a web framework for Smalltalk who runs on Squeak. Period. > > Who ever is interested in the Weekly Squeak can read it directly or > via RSS feed. If we have a weekly Squeak on this list, shouldn't we > have a weekly Cincom Smalltalk, Dolphin Smalltalk, Gemstone Smalltalk > and GNU Smalltalk as well? If we had all these would that still be > appropriate? What's the reasoning for not posting on the Magma and > Exupery lists as well? > > Or to make an other example. Would you find it appropriate if the Sun > news team would post the weekly Java in the mailinglist of Tapestry? > I certainly understand your point and I guess I would agree more if any of these potential abusive posters actually had something to post. We have had updates from Cincom and Gemstone on this list. We had a nice debate somewhere about Dolphin (might have been squeak-dev) We even have had updates from sun about Lively Kernel. There were no abusive posts. I appreciate your comments about the weekly squeak, but your response just doesn't hold up in my mind. This is not a large community that needs strict policing. I don't think our posts were excessive, nor do I think it is setting a precedent for others to abuse the list. I like posting to the seaside list because it might help draw someone that learned about seaside into the larger Squeak Community. I think it helps make a more friendly environment and brings us all together as a larger family of communities. I like writing about all the communities even outside ones like Strongtalk, or Ian's Reinventing Computing, or Gilad's Newspeak, because these are the things that interest our communities. I don't think what we have been doing is just fluff. I really do feel like you place too little emphasis on our promotion of Seaside. I think you undervalue the benefit the content we produce brings to your community. I would think you would appreciate our efforts. Ron _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
In reply to this post by Michael Haupt-3
> It would have been good to know earlier, though, that "the Seaside
> community" is not particularly interested in the Summaries. If there > is no such interest for No. 17, what about the earlier ones? Why now, > all of a sudden? Has "the community" come to that conclusion just > recently? Why not responding to the News team directly, instead of > starting an off-topic discussion on the Seaside list? These open and > blunt "we don't want your stuff" posts really don't serve anyone. It's > just the kind of noise that seems to be undesired. > These questions are excellent and I dont see them not only not refuted but not even aswered (so valid) by who says who run this list and thinks it's speaking in behalf other participants without care of the message he's passing. A message which behind the words it's making no other thing but promoting inhibition among subscribers. I'm very surprised to see among leaders/contributors an attitude like that in a community which is supposed to be maketing itself as being of open spirit, challenging future and "welcoming people to the beach". What kind of sad example is that? Better is to remember and meditate on the Seaside origins. In case intention was different we need serius improvements in comunication skills. Michael, I wanted to express that your communication work helps ostracism not to prevail. This intellectual jewels deserves to be known. People who works with technology seems to allways need help to make its goals to be known. Thank you for keeping warm a comunication vehicle which not only publishes Seaside cases but is directly related with the technology we use. Sebastian, a member of the Seaside comunity _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
In reply to this post by Philippe Marschall
> That was not intended to be a quality rating about about your work,
> indeed I find the weekly Squeak of high quality, there is no need to > be offended. The reason I wrote this mail to the list instead of the > news team directly is that we can have a discussion in public and > everyone who is interested can post his opinion. > Then please meditate about using a more intelligent way to generate controversy. > What made me write this mail is that to me: > - Seaside is not about promoting Smalltalk > - Seaside is not about the Squeak "environment" (EToys, Shopie, > Croquet, Scratch, OLPC, SqueakLand, research project X, ...) > to me Seaside is a web framework for Smalltalk who runs on > Squeak. Period. > Is good to see you clarifying you are speaking for yourself because that’s very different of the "we" word you lightly used and everybody read in your original reply to the news team. > Who ever is interested in the Weekly Squeak can read it directly or > via RSS feed. If we have a weekly Squeak on this list, shouldn't we > have a weekly Cincom Smalltalk, Dolphin Smalltalk, Gemstone Smalltalk > and GNU Smalltalk as well? If we had all these would that still be > appropriate? What's the reasoning for not posting on the Magma and > Exupery lists as well? > If they are publishing Seaside cases or platform improvments which directly benefit Seaside projects you think is not appropriate? If so you better delete the mail from your inbox because I bet lot of people here would be interested. > Or to make an other example. Would you find it appropriate if the Sun > news team would post the weekly Java in the mailinglist of Tapestry? > > Cheers > Philippe > Is amazingly sad you are trying to convince people by comparing Sun Microsystems to Squeak. And you made it public. You are an important member of this community and to see this is for me a real pity. A real public shoot in the foot who helps nobody. cheers, Sebastian _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
In reply to this post by Steve Aldred-3
I know that Seaside is used not just on Squeak but on VW, Gemstone and GNU ST, that is not the point.
That is the reason I wrote "an" entry point to smalltalk in "general" and squeak in "particular". Now, I don't want to start a flamewar here but my *personal* opinion is that a lot of interesting projects are based in squeak (squeak, olpc, spoon, etc) and therefore it's important to inform people about this kind of projects that aren't found in other environments. Besides, squeak and other projects are community supported, so lacking funds to promote them commercialy (as VW can) the obious way to promote them is by mailing lists AND by word of mouth. I don't think that this weekly new is taking a side with Squeak, but trying to show all the options, technologies, and event of interest that happens in the smalltalk world (name it Squeak, VW, Gemstone/S, GNU ST, etc) This kind of attitude towards *external* information doesn't help to grow our (in comparison) small community. We need to grow it and the more friendly we are, the better for us in the long time. Miguel Cobá On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 9:53 PM, Steve Aldred <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
> I don't think that this weekly new is taking a side with Squeak, but
trying to show all >the options, technologies, and event of interest that happens in the smalltalk world (name it >Squeak, VW, Gemstone/S, GNU ST, etc) > This kind of attitude towards *external* information doesn't help to grow our (in >comparison) small community. We need to grow it and the more friendly we are, the better for >us in the long time. Miguel Cobá +1 here. You expressed our interests in the right direction Miguel. Sebastian _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |