ToolBuilder-based Browser?

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
7 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

ToolBuilder-based Browser?

Michael van der Gulik-2
Hi all.

Is there a version of the Browser which has been made using ToolBuilder?

I'm modifying the Browser now to support Namespaces (http://www.squeaksource.com/SecureSqueak , strictly work in progress), and it's become apparent to me that it could be done better. I thought that if nobody else has done it then I could spend a bit more time refactoring the Browser and then contribute the re-usable portions back to Squeak.

Michael.


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ToolBuilder-based Browser?

Bert Freudenberg

On Feb 1, 2007, at 21:06 , Michael van der Gulik wrote:

> Hi all.
>
> Is there a version of the Browser which has been made using  
> ToolBuilder?

The current Browser implements the #buildWith: protocol, but I think  
it is not hooked up to actually be used. IIRC there was another one  
in Andreas' PlusTools.

- Bert -



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ToolBuilder-based Browser?

Michael van der Gulik-2


On 2/2/07, Bert Freudenberg <[hidden email]> wrote:

On Feb 1, 2007, at 21:06 , Michael van der Gulik wrote:

> Hi all.
>
> Is there a version of the Browser which has been made using
> ToolBuilder?

The current Browser implements the #buildWith: protocol, but I think
it is not hooked up to actually be used. IIRC there was another one
in Andreas' PlusTools.

You mean this PlusTools by Stef and Marcus?: http://www.squeaksource.com/PlusTools

Michael.


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ToolBuilder-based Browser?

Bert Freudenberg

On Feb 1, 2007, at 21:37 , Michael van der Gulik wrote:

>
>
> On 2/2/07, Bert Freudenberg <[hidden email]> wrote:
> On Feb 1, 2007, at 21:06 , Michael van der Gulik wrote:
>
> > Hi all.
> >
> > Is there a version of the Browser which has been made using
> > ToolBuilder?
>
> The current Browser implements the #buildWith: protocol, but I think
> it is not hooked up to actually be used. IIRC there was another one
> in Andreas' PlusTools.
>
> You mean this PlusTools by Stef and Marcus?: http://
> www.squeaksource.com/PlusTools

Yes, maybe they uploaded it there.

- Bert -



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ToolBuilder-based Browser?

stephane ducasse
We tried to rescue the ToolsPlus and youshould find the package in  
the sqeuakfoundation squeaksource
but this is dead project (except if someone want to resurrect it)  
which would be cool.

Stef


>> On 2/2/07, Bert Freudenberg <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> On Feb 1, 2007, at 21:06 , Michael van der Gulik wrote:
>>
>> > Hi all.
>> >
>> > Is there a version of the Browser which has been made using
>> > ToolBuilder?
>>
>> The current Browser implements the #buildWith: protocol, but I think
>> it is not hooked up to actually be used. IIRC there was another one
>> in Andreas' PlusTools.
>>
>> You mean this PlusTools by Stef and Marcus?: http://
>> www.squeaksource.com/PlusTools
>
> Yes, maybe they uploaded it there.
>
> - Bert -
>
>
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ToolBuilder-based Browser?

Michael van der Gulik
>>> On 2/2/07, Bert Freudenberg <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> On Feb 1, 2007, at 21:06 , Michael van der Gulik wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi all.
>>> >
>>> > Is there a version of the Browser which has been made using
>>> > ToolBuilder?
>>>
>>> The current Browser implements the #buildWith: protocol, but I think
>>> it is not hooked up to actually be used. IIRC there was another one
>>> in Andreas' PlusTools.
>>>
>>> You mean this PlusTools by Stef and Marcus?: http://
>>> www.squeaksource.com/PlusTools
>>
>>
>> Yes, maybe they uploaded it there.

stephane ducasse wrote:
 > We tried to rescue the ToolsPlus and youshould find the package in  the
 > sqeuakfoundation squeaksource
 > but this is dead project (except if someone want to resurrect it)  which
 > would be cool.

I've had a brief look at it. What is it's current status and level of
completion? Were references to Morphic slowly being pruned out, or are
they already gone?

It seems to be working well enough to develop with, with a few minor
glitches such as the object explorer and file manager not working, and
the hierarchy browser had a pane out.

Also, I tried to get at the tools using MVC (to see if it really used
ToolBuilder fully) but it appears my MVC has become unusable - mouse
clicks seem to get stuck in mud. Do other people have the same problem
or is it something I broke?

Also, does the Tweak image from tweak.impara.de have ToolBuilder and
Monticello?

Regards,
Michael.


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ToolBuilder-based Browser?

Bert Freudenberg
On Feb 2, 2007, at 10:41 , Michael van der Gulik wrote:
> Also, does the Tweak image from tweak.impara.de have ToolBuilder  
> and Monticello?

Yes.

- Bert -