Hi all.
Is there a version of the Browser which has been made using ToolBuilder? I'm modifying the Browser now to support Namespaces (http://www.squeaksource.com/SecureSqueak , strictly work in progress), and it's become apparent to me that it could be done better. I thought that if nobody else has done it then I could spend a bit more time refactoring the Browser and then contribute the re-usable portions back to Squeak. Michael. |
On Feb 1, 2007, at 21:06 , Michael van der Gulik wrote: > Hi all. > > Is there a version of the Browser which has been made using > ToolBuilder? The current Browser implements the #buildWith: protocol, but I think it is not hooked up to actually be used. IIRC there was another one in Andreas' PlusTools. - Bert - |
On 2/2/07, Bert Freudenberg <[hidden email]> wrote:
You mean this PlusTools by Stef and Marcus?: http://www.squeaksource.com/PlusTools Michael. |
On Feb 1, 2007, at 21:37 , Michael van der Gulik wrote: > > > On 2/2/07, Bert Freudenberg <[hidden email]> wrote: > On Feb 1, 2007, at 21:06 , Michael van der Gulik wrote: > > > Hi all. > > > > Is there a version of the Browser which has been made using > > ToolBuilder? > > The current Browser implements the #buildWith: protocol, but I think > it is not hooked up to actually be used. IIRC there was another one > in Andreas' PlusTools. > > You mean this PlusTools by Stef and Marcus?: http:// > www.squeaksource.com/PlusTools Yes, maybe they uploaded it there. - Bert - |
We tried to rescue the ToolsPlus and youshould find the package in
the sqeuakfoundation squeaksource but this is dead project (except if someone want to resurrect it) which would be cool. Stef >> On 2/2/07, Bert Freudenberg <[hidden email]> wrote: >> On Feb 1, 2007, at 21:06 , Michael van der Gulik wrote: >> >> > Hi all. >> > >> > Is there a version of the Browser which has been made using >> > ToolBuilder? >> >> The current Browser implements the #buildWith: protocol, but I think >> it is not hooked up to actually be used. IIRC there was another one >> in Andreas' PlusTools. >> >> You mean this PlusTools by Stef and Marcus?: http:// >> www.squeaksource.com/PlusTools > > Yes, maybe they uploaded it there. > > - Bert - > > > > |
>>> On 2/2/07, Bert Freudenberg <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> On Feb 1, 2007, at 21:06 , Michael van der Gulik wrote: >>> >>> > Hi all. >>> > >>> > Is there a version of the Browser which has been made using >>> > ToolBuilder? >>> >>> The current Browser implements the #buildWith: protocol, but I think >>> it is not hooked up to actually be used. IIRC there was another one >>> in Andreas' PlusTools. >>> >>> You mean this PlusTools by Stef and Marcus?: http:// >>> www.squeaksource.com/PlusTools >> >> >> Yes, maybe they uploaded it there. stephane ducasse wrote: > We tried to rescue the ToolsPlus and youshould find the package in the > sqeuakfoundation squeaksource > but this is dead project (except if someone want to resurrect it) which > would be cool. I've had a brief look at it. What is it's current status and level of completion? Were references to Morphic slowly being pruned out, or are they already gone? It seems to be working well enough to develop with, with a few minor glitches such as the object explorer and file manager not working, and the hierarchy browser had a pane out. Also, I tried to get at the tools using MVC (to see if it really used ToolBuilder fully) but it appears my MVC has become unusable - mouse clicks seem to get stuck in mud. Do other people have the same problem or is it something I broke? Also, does the Tweak image from tweak.impara.de have ToolBuilder and Monticello? Regards, Michael. |
On Feb 2, 2007, at 10:41 , Michael van der Gulik wrote:
> Also, does the Tweak image from tweak.impara.de have ToolBuilder > and Monticello? Yes. - Bert - |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |