Trunk license?

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Trunk license?

EstebanLM
Hi,
I suppose all the trunk changes are MIT released, but I'm not sure. Can
anybody confirm that?

Cheers,
Esteban



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Trunk license?

Levente Uzonyi-2
On Fri, 25 Dec 2009, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:

> Hi,
> I suppose all the trunk changes are MIT released, but I'm not sure. Can
> anybody confirm that?

Yes.
http://source.squeak.org/trunk.html
http://source.squeak.org/inbox.html
http://squeakboard.wordpress.com/2009/07/02/a-new-community-development-model/


Levente

>
> Cheers,
> Esteban
>
>
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Trunk license?

Randal L. Schwartz
>>>>> "Levente" == Levente Uzonyi <[hidden email]> writes:

Levente> Yes.
Levente> http://source.squeak.org/trunk.html
Levente> http://source.squeak.org/inbox.html
Levente> http://squeakboard.wordpress.com/2009/07/02/a-new-community-development-model/

Beware of reaching too far back though, until we confirm 3.10.2 is
fully MIT.  Anything on *top* of 3.10.2 has been required to be MIT.

--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<[hidden email]> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion