Dave Lewis uploaded a new version of VMMaker to project VM Maker: http://www.squeaksource.com/VMMaker/VMMaker.oscog-dtl.59.mcz ==================== Summary ==================== Name: VMMaker.oscog-dtl.59 Author: dtl Time: 17 April 2011, 8:53:18 am UUID: c1d30608-042d-4bb7-20ca-2bf7a46c1508 Ancestors: VMMaker-oscog.dtl.58 Add primitiveImageFormatVersion, an optional named primitive answering the image format number of the current image. This is the value stored in the first word of an image file header when the image is saved, and possibly modified on image load if the VM adds or removes capabilities for the running image. This primitive was added to VMMaker trunk in VMMaker-dtl.169. Rationale: supports float word order handing for image segments, reference http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/vm-dev/2011-April/007712.html |
I uploaded this using the <package>.<branch>-<initials>.<id> naming convention that Colin described, but I'm not sure that the results are any different from the <package>-<branch>-<initials>.<id> naming convention that Igor had previously established. I'm going to delete VMMaker.oscog-dtl.59 from the archive. Hopefully no one has updated their local repository in the last 15 minutes. Sorry for the confusion. Thanks, Dave On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 03:10:31AM +0000, [hidden email] wrote: > Dave Lewis uploaded a new version of VMMaker to project VM Maker: > http://www.squeaksource.com/VMMaker/VMMaker.oscog-dtl.59.mcz > > ==================== Summary ==================== > > Name: VMMaker.oscog-dtl.59 > Author: dtl > Time: 17 April 2011, 8:53:18 am > UUID: c1d30608-042d-4bb7-20ca-2bf7a46c1508 > Ancestors: VMMaker-oscog.dtl.58 > > Add primitiveImageFormatVersion, an optional named primitive answering the image format number of the current image. This is the value stored in the first word of an image file header when the image is saved, and possibly modified on image load if the VM adds or removes capabilities for the running image. This primitive was added to VMMaker trunk in VMMaker-dtl.169. > > Rationale: supports float word order handing for image segments, reference http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/vm-dev/2011-April/007712.html |
On 18.04.2011, at 03:43, David T. Lewis wrote: > > I uploaded this using the <package>.<branch>-<initials>.<id> naming > convention that Colin described, but I'm not sure that the results are > any different from the <package>-<branch>-<initials>.<id> naming convention > that Igor had previously established. I'd still switch to the <package>.<branch> naming scheme. It is a better convention since it potentially allows the tools to deal with branches differently. It's just that nobody except the original developers seems to have known about this convention and so the MC UI tools have evolved without taking it into account. Let's fix the tools (e.g., display all branches when a package is selected, if that's what we want). - Bert - |
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:23:03AM +0200, Bert Freudenberg wrote: > > On 18.04.2011, at 03:43, David T. Lewis wrote: > > > > I uploaded this using the <package>.<branch>-<initials>.<id> naming > > convention that Colin described, but I'm not sure that the results are > > any different from the <package>-<branch>-<initials>.<id> naming convention > > that Igor had previously established. > > I'd still switch to the <package>.<branch> naming scheme. It is a better > convention since it potentially allows the tools to deal with branches differently. > > It's just that nobody except the original developers seems to have known > about this convention and so the MC UI tools have evolved without taking > it into account. > > Let's fix the tools (e.g., display all branches when a package is selected, > if that's what we want). Thanks Bert. Igor, Eliot: The MC browser is currently displaying the packages "VMMaker" and "VMMaker-oscog". If we use the recommended naming, we will see an additional "VMMaker.oscog" representing the oscog branch. That would be better long term but we're hoping this is not a long term problem, so I'm not sure if this is worth changing now. Igor, do you mind if I wimp out and ask you to make the decision on this? Should we start using "VMMaker.oscog-IgorStasenko.nnn" rather than "VMMaker-oscog-IgorStasenko.nnn"? Dave |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |