Hi Dale. THe error message "Version #stable is not defined in ConfigurationOfSqueakDBX" is misleading, because #stable is indeed defined in ConfigurationOfSqueakDBX but there is no version defined for the pharo iamge where I am loading. Example:
ConfoigurationOfSqueakDBX >> stable: spec <symbolicVersion: #stable> spec for: #'pharo1.0.x' version: '1.2'. spec for: #'pharo1.1.x' version: '1.2'. And I try to do: (ConfigurationOfSqueakDBX project version: #stable) load in a Pharo 1.2. I think the error should be: "There is not any stable version defined for Pharo 1.2 in ConfigurationOfSqueakDBX" or something like that... Cheers Mariano |
he he
I just sent an email about this :-) Alexandre On 18 Mar 2011, at 13:48, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > Hi Dale. THe error message "Version #stable is not defined in ConfigurationOfSqueakDBX" is misleading, because #stable is indeed defined in ConfigurationOfSqueakDBX but there is no version defined for the pharo iamge where I am loading. Example: > > ConfoigurationOfSqueakDBX >> stable: spec > <symbolicVersion: #stable> > > spec for: #'pharo1.0.x' version: '1.2'. > spec for: #'pharo1.1.x' version: '1.2'. > > > And I try to do: (ConfigurationOfSqueakDBX project version: #stable) load > in a Pharo 1.2. > > I think the error should be: "There is not any stable version defined for Pharo 1.2 in ConfigurationOfSqueakDBX" > or something like that... > > Cheers > > Mariano -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. |
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote: he he Excellent...Sorry I didn't see it. Cheers Mariano Alexandre |
Mariano,
You were commenting on the fact that the message is misleading right? Not that you are getting the error when it shouldn't be thrown (as is the case for Alexandre)? Dale On 03/18/2011 01:34 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Alexandre Bergel > <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote: > > he he > I just sent an email about this :-) > > > Excellent...Sorry I didn't see it. > > Cheers > > Mariano > > Alexandre > > > On 18 Mar 2011, at 13:48, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > > > Hi Dale. THe error message "Version #stable is not defined in > ConfigurationOfSqueakDBX" is misleading, because #stable is indeed > defined in ConfigurationOfSqueakDBX but there is no version defined > for the pharo iamge where I am loading. Example: > > > > ConfoigurationOfSqueakDBX >> stable: spec > > <symbolicVersion: #stable> > > > > spec for: #'pharo1.0.x' version: '1.2'. > > spec for: #'pharo1.1.x' version: '1.2'. > > > > > > And I try to do: (ConfigurationOfSqueakDBX project version: > #stable) load > > in a Pharo 1.2. > > > > I think the error should be: "There is not any stable version > defined for Pharo 1.2 in ConfigurationOfSqueakDBX" > > or something like that... > > > > Cheers > > > > Mariano > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > |
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Dale Henrichs <[hidden email]> wrote: Mariano, Yes, exactly. Indeed, it is quite perfect the message. I would just add that it is not defined for THAT version. Because #stable IS defined, but there is no version for that specific Pharo version. cheers mariano Dale |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |