Folks, it would be really nice if we could get rid of these annoying restrictions (see below). A few megabytes really shouldn't matter in 2020. It just feels ancient and antiquated ... Couldn't someone increase this limit up to, let's say, 500 MB or at least 50 MB? When someone uses a metered connection, most email clients offer an option to disable automatical attachment downloading ...
Best, Christoph Von: Beginners <[hidden email]> im Auftrag von [hidden email] <[hidden email]>
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. Januar 2020 16:11 Uhr An: Thiede, Christoph Betreff: Your message to Beginners awaits moderator approval Your mail to 'Beginners' with the subject
AW: [Newbies] code to retrieve all method categories and methods under a category Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. The reason it is being held: Message body is too big: 1038818 bytes with a limit of 100 KB Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive notification of the moderator's decision. If you would like to cancel this posting, please visit the following URL: ...
Carpe Squeak!
|
500 MB seems excessive but 5 MB or 10 MB seems reasonable unless server capacity is an issue. Best, Karl On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 4:17 PM Thiede, Christoph <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
In reply to this post by Christoph Thiede
Please no.
I use mutt as my primary mail reader, and I use a small independent ISP for mail services with a relatively small disk quota. I will remove myself from any mailing list that propagates half-gigabyte emails. Dave > Folks, it would be really nice if we could get rid of these annoying > restrictions (see below). A few megabytes really shouldn't matter in 2020. > It just feels ancient and antiquated ... > > Couldn't someone increase this limit up to, let's say, 500 MB or at least > 50 MB? When someone uses a metered connection, most email clients offer an > option to disable automatical attachment downloading ... > > > Best, > > Christoph > > ________________________________ > Von: Beginners <[hidden email]> im Auftrag > von [hidden email] > <[hidden email]> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. Januar 2020 16:11 Uhr > An: Thiede, Christoph > Betreff: Your message to Beginners awaits moderator approval > > Your mail to 'Beginners' with the subject > > AW: [Newbies] code to retrieve all method categories and methods > under a category > > Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. > > The reason it is being held: > > Message body is too big: 1038818 bytes with a limit of 100 KB > > Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive > notification of the moderator's decision. If you would like to cancel > this posting, please visit the following URL: > > ... > > > |
In reply to this post by Karl Ramberg
A large GIF (for a screencast) can cost up to 10 MB. It would be good if you could send a few of such GIFs without reaching the limit ...
Best, Christoph Von: Squeak-dev <[hidden email]> im Auftrag von karl ramberg <[hidden email]>
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. Januar 2020 16:58:12 An: The general-purpose Squeak developers list Betreff: Re: [squeak-dev] WG: Your message to Beginners awaits moderator approval 500 MB seems excessive but 5 MB or 10 MB seems reasonable unless server capacity is an issue.
Best,
Karl
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 4:17 PM Thiede, Christoph <[hidden email]> wrote:
Carpe Squeak!
|
In reply to this post by David T. Lewis
Does your critic apply to 10 or 50 MB as well? It's so impractical to have a mailing list that does not support sending screenshots.
Best, Christoph Von: Squeak-dev <[hidden email]> im Auftrag von David T. Lewis <[hidden email]>
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. Januar 2020 22:10:00 An: The general-purpose Squeak developers list Betreff: Re: [squeak-dev] WG: Your message to Beginners awaits moderator approval Please no.
I use mutt as my primary mail reader, and I use a small independent ISP for mail services with a relatively small disk quota. I will remove myself from any mailing list that propagates half-gigabyte emails. Dave > Folks, it would be really nice if we could get rid of these annoying > restrictions (see below). A few megabytes really shouldn't matter in 2020. > It just feels ancient and antiquated ... > > Couldn't someone increase this limit up to, let's say, 500 MB or at least > 50 MB? When someone uses a metered connection, most email clients offer an > option to disable automatical attachment downloading ... > > > Best, > > Christoph > > ________________________________ > Von: Beginners <[hidden email]> im Auftrag > von [hidden email] > <[hidden email]> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. Januar 2020 16:11 Uhr > An: Thiede, Christoph > Betreff: Your message to Beginners awaits moderator approval > > Your mail to 'Beginners' with the subject > > AW: [Newbies] code to retrieve all method categories and methods > under a category > > Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. > > The reason it is being held: > > Message body is too big: 1038818 bytes with a limit of 100 KB > > Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive > notification of the moderator's decision. If you would like to cancel > this posting, please visit the following URL: > > ... > > >
Carpe Squeak!
|
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 12:49:38PM +0000, Thiede, Christoph wrote:
> Does your critic apply to 10 or 50 MB as well? It's so impractical to have a mailing list that does not support sending screenshots. > Yes it does. For me, opening the attached graphics is an annoyance, especially when I find out that the attachment contains something that could just as easily have been said in a couple of lines of text. So I end up just ignoring many of those messages and deleting the attachments. By way of explanation, I keep a separate gmail account for junk mail, and I use [hidden email] for things that I care about, such as Squeak. I will often bounce things with interesting graphics over to gmail, but postings that contain lots of casual screen shot attachments just get deleted, sorry. Dave > > Best, > > Christoph > > ________________________________ > Von: Squeak-dev <[hidden email]> im Auftrag von David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. Januar 2020 22:10:00 > An: The general-purpose Squeak developers list > Betreff: Re: [squeak-dev] WG: Your message to Beginners awaits moderator approval > > Please no. > > I use mutt as my primary mail reader, and I use a small independent ISP > for mail services with a relatively small disk quota. I will remove myself > from any mailing list that propagates half-gigabyte emails. > > Dave > > > Folks, it would be really nice if we could get rid of these annoying > > restrictions (see below). A few megabytes really shouldn't matter in 2020. > > It just feels ancient and antiquated ... > > > > Couldn't someone increase this limit up to, let's say, 500 MB or at least > > 50 MB? When someone uses a metered connection, most email clients offer an > > option to disable automatical attachment downloading ... > > > > > > Best, > > > > Christoph > > > > ________________________________ > > Von: Beginners <[hidden email]> im Auftrag > > von [hidden email] > > <[hidden email]> > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. Januar 2020 16:11 Uhr > > An: Thiede, Christoph > > Betreff: Your message to Beginners awaits moderator approval > > > > Your mail to 'Beginners' with the subject > > > > AW: [Newbies] code to retrieve all method categories and methods > > under a category > > > > Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. > > > > The reason it is being held: > > > > Message body is too big: 1038818 bytes with a limit of 100 KB > > > > Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive > > notification of the moderator's decision. If you would like to cancel > > this posting, please visit the following URL: > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > |
In reply to this post by Christoph Thiede
What is the use case for enabling large email messages on the Beginners List? Is the list less effective because of the current limit? Are we discussing images/content other than screen shots? Have any alternatives been explored? I would like to see a rational argument for the proposal before I decide if I support it. -jrm On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 8:17 AM Thiede, Christoph <[hidden email]> wrote:
-- John-Reed Maffeo |
In reply to this post by David T. Lewis
I'm with Dave on this. The problem with allowing larger attachments on more widely used mailing lists is people start cluttering up posts with images in their sigs, html posts etc. and pretty soon even a trivial 'I agree' post comes along with a couple meg of cruft. On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 9:05 AM David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote: On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 12:49:38PM +0000, Thiede, Christoph wrote: |
> I'm with Dave on this. The problem with allowing larger attachments on
> more widely used mailing lists is people start cluttering up posts with > images in their sigs, html posts etc. and pretty soon even a trivial 'I > agree' post comes along with a couple meg of cruft. +1 Stef |
In reply to this post by jrm
Hi John,
it is just annoying that I cannot send usual screenshots over the list. It's not the first time I collided with this limit when trying to send an on-topic message to the list. I admit the request for 500 MB was way too high, but to make this discussion more fact-based, I made some tests:
A usual fullscreen screenshot on a high-DPI monitor, stored as PNG file, can cost up to 3 MB. Sometimes we even have animated gifs on this list, Marcel sent one recently to demonstrate a bug, and I valuate this possibility, too. A small animated gif
(500 x 400 px) can also cost up to 5 MB. The mail that has been rejected yesterday contains a detailed step-by-step description with 7 screenshots (however, they only show each one window, so they are much smaller). Don't we want such detailed content on the list? At the moment, I would need to upload the images to an external hoster, which is much more time-consuming for both writers and readers.
I believe in the phrase "one picture says more than thousand words". And even if it only said just as much, it would still be easier and faster to understand.
@Dave, I still do not understand what is your problem with graphics. Don't usual mail clients have a cache for attachment that can clear itself automatically? Or are you using a metered connection?
@Phil: Excessive use of memes or banners may indeed be a matter of flavor. But IMHO, first, the current limit cannot hinder anyone from sending this kind of content, and second, there are alternative and more effective ways of content moderation than attachment
limits :)
Best,
Christoph
Von: Squeak-dev <[hidden email]> im Auftrag von John-Reed Maffeo <[hidden email]>
Gesendet: Freitag, 17. Januar 2020 15:57:15 An: The general-purpose Squeak developers list Betreff: Re: [squeak-dev] WG: Your message to Beginners awaits moderator approval What is the use case for enabling large email messages on the Beginners List? Is the list less effective because of the current limit? Are we discussing images/content other than screen shots? Have any alternatives
been explored? I would like to see a rational argument for the proposal before I decide if I support it.
-jrm
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 8:17 AM Thiede, Christoph <[hidden email]> wrote:
-- John-Reed Maffeo
Carpe Squeak!
|
In reply to this post by Christoph Thiede
> On 2020-01-17, at 3:07 AM, Thiede, Christoph <[hidden email]> wrote: > > A large GIF (for a screencast) can cost up to 10 MB. It would be good if you could send a few of such GIFs without reaching the limit ... No idea if it is still the case but I recall Apple (presumably for their own email service) used to have a mechanism where the large content of an email would get shunted to a storage location and when recipients looked at the mail it would be downloaded directly. So a slightly different approach to limiting email download sizes and handled a bit more neatly. We could probably do sometihng similar with our email server; pull out the large content, stick somewhere, substitute a URL, whatever. tim -- tim Rowledge; [hidden email]; http://www.rowledge.org/tim Useful Latin Phrases:- Quo signo nata es? = What's your sign? |
In reply to this post by Christoph Thiede
We raised the limit on squeak-dev a while ago, we will raise the limit on beginners (this probably was just an oversight). That being said, I can see no reason why you would have to attach a fullscreen snapshot, instead of snapshotting the relevant part of your screen. Similarly, a 3-second small-window screen cast to explain something is reasonable to just paste into an email, but for a full-length hi-res video you really should send a link instead. - Bert - On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 9:48 AM Thiede, Christoph <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
Agree with Bert. There are many ways to share an image without adding it to the email! Ron On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 1:06 PM Bert Freudenberg <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
The message size limit for beginners is now the same as on squeak-dev: 2 MB. - Bert - |
Thanks, Bert :-) I hope I did not annoy anyone. Do I need to resend my message or will it be approved automatically?
Best, Christoph Von: Squeak-dev <[hidden email]> im Auftrag von Bert Freudenberg <[hidden email]>
Gesendet: Freitag, 17. Januar 2020 22:21:29 An: The general-purpose Squeak developers list Betreff: Re: [squeak-dev] WG: Your message to Beginners awaits moderator approval
The message size limit for beginners is now the same as on squeak-dev: 2 MB.
- Bert -
Carpe Squeak!
|
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 09:39:57PM +0000, Thiede, Christoph wrote:
> Thanks, Bert :-) I hope I did not annoy anyone. > No, you did not annoy anyone :-) Thanks for your understanding. Dave > Do I need to resend my message or will it be approved automatically? > > > Best, > > Christoph > > ________________________________ > Von: Squeak-dev <[hidden email]> im Auftrag von Bert Freudenberg <[hidden email]> > Gesendet: Freitag, 17. Januar 2020 22:21:29 > An: The general-purpose Squeak developers list > Betreff: Re: [squeak-dev] WG: Your message to Beginners awaits moderator approval > > The message size limit for beginners is now the same as on squeak-dev: 2 MB. > > - Bert - > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |