What is the proper way to get the Refactoring Browser in 3.9

I have installed RB and AST from SqueakMap for 3.9, but I have many
random problem swith features not working as hierarchy browsing, simple
editing in the browser, refactoring tools as renaming methods.
These problems happen more or less randomly.

Hilaire

On 09.09.2006, at 12:04, Hilaire Fernandes wrote:

> I have installed RB and AST from SqueakMap for 3.9, but I have many  
> random problem swith features not working as hierarchy browsing,  
> simple editing in the browser, refactoring tools as renaming methods.
> These problems happen more or less randomly.

I just updated the packages listed on SqueakMap to the latest  
versions from SqeakSource:

AST#86
RefactoringEngine#20

Can you check if the problem persists?

    Marcus

Marcus Denker a écrit :
Updated to these version.

It can still identify two problems:

-hierarchy browsing does not work from the RB browser
-renaming a method does not work

Hilaire

On 10.09.2006, at 18:36, Hilaire Fernandes wrote:

Can you add bug reports with instructions to recreate the problem
to the mantis bugtracker? (Project "Squeak Packages")

   Marcus

>
> Can you add bug reports with instructions to recreate the problem
> to the mantis bugtracker? (Project "Squeak Packages")
>
>   Marcus

http://bugs.impara.de/view.php?id=4866

On 10.09.2006, at 21:11, Hilaire Fernandes wrote:

>
>> Can you add bug reports with instructions to recreate the problem
>> to the mantis bugtracker? (Project "Squeak Packages")
>>   Marcus
>
> http://bugs.impara.de/view.php?id=4866
>

The

MessageNotUnderstood: OBSystemBrowserAdaptor>>spawnHierarchy

says that you registered OB as your default browser...

The same error happens when you select the OB as the default browser,
then open the old browser and press on "hierarchy".

So it's not a bug of the Refactoring Browser...

Can you give a failing example for the rename method?

The Refactoring stuff definietly needs some improvements...

  -> integrate with Services / OB
  -> add refactoring for Traits (e.g. extract-to-trait)
  -> merge Scanner/Parser with NewCompiler parser
  -> *much* better UI... most dialogs are quite bad
  -> .....

    Marcus

Marcus Denker a écrit :
Oh, ok.

>
> The same error happens when you select the OB as the default browser,
> then open the old browser and press on "hierarchy".
>
> So it's not a bug of the Refactoring Browser...



> Can you give a failing example for the rename method?


Well, it is repeatable. I try at least three times.

>
>
>> Can you give a failing example for the rename method?
>
>
> Well, it is repeatable. I try at least three times.
>

Hmm... I do

-> select a method
-> rename
-> strange dialog appears
-> I change in the upper most pane the name
-> accept (name appears in the lower pane)
-> press ok
-> method is renamed.

Do you have a way to reproduce the error?

    Marcus

Marcus Denker a écrit :
At work my image is fine. I remember I loaded in the wrong order the
needed packages. May be this is the problem.

Hilaire

>
>    Marcus
>

Yes, thanks for that Hilaire. I had loaded RB before AST and had similar problems. After loading in the correct order, all seems fine.

...Stan

Hilaire Fernandes-3 wrote

At work my image is fine. I remember I loaded in the wrong order the
needed packages. May be this is the problem.

Hilaire

Hi,

Is there a reason for not using the squeak-dev images? They contain
the most recent version of RB and other cool tools.

Bye

2007/11/28, stan414 <[hidden email]>:

--
Damien Cassou

Good question Damien,

I did start out with the dev image, but then backtracked.  Think it was when I tried to get it going with Freetype fonts. Now I'm a bit more familiar, I should probably export my work and import back into a clean dev image.

;;;Stan

Damien Cassou-3 wrote

Hi,

Is there a reason for not using the squeak-dev images? They contain
the most recent version of RB and other cool tools.

Bye

2007/11/28, stan414 <squeak414@free.fr>:
>
> Yes, thanks for that Hilaire. I had loaded RB before AST and had similar
> problems. After loading in the correct order, all seems fine.
>
> ...Stan
>
>

2007/12/6, stan414 <[hidden email]>:
>
> Good question Damien,
>
> I did start out with the dev image, but then backtracked.  Think it was when
> I tried to get it going with Freetype fonts. Now I'm a bit more familiar, I
> should probably export my work and import back into a clean dev image.


The FreeType Plus package of Andrew Tween works perfectly on squeak-dev images.

--
Damien Cassou

I didn't mean to imply otherwise; I stuffed something up around that time, and on the precautionary principle went back to the simplest config.

Damien Cassou-3 wrote

The FreeType Plus package of Andrew Tween works perfectly on squeak-dev images.

--
Damien Cassou