Why would you expect good documentation for THIS particular morph as
opposed to all the rest?
Not trying to be funny, so much as just pointing out that it is a
well-known issue with virtually all classes in Smalltalk, especially
those that are part of someone's pet project.
L.
On 1/28/12 10:10 PM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
> AtomMorphs take their topLeft as their position. This causes them to bounce
> past the bottom and right edges of their container by "atom width" and "atom
> height" respectively.
>
> Then, BouncingAtomsMorph comes to the rescue in #step with:
> r _ bounds origin corner: (bounds corner - (8@8)).
>
> Why was this done this way? Was it to make the AtomMorph's method look like
> more purely like a mathematical formula for a particle? If so, this makes
> sense, but a comment documenting the intent would be really nice.
>
> Sean
>
> --
> View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/Why-does-BouncingAtomsMorph-fudge-bounds-tp4337653p4337653.html> Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
Locked
