WinXP users?
Locked
 
|
Hi all,
are there any other WinXP users out there who have trouble using SqueakMap on a virgin 3.8 image? I have massive problems here, CPU going up to 100% and so on. I *believe* that is caused by a primitive failure where the ST code is executed, which would explain a lot. That would also mean that the current VM for XP is buggy. Could anybody verify this? Günther |
|
|
> are there any other WinXP users out there who have trouble using > SqueakMap on a virgin 3.8 image? > I have massive problems here, CPU going up to 100% and so on. > I *believe* that is caused by a primitive failure where the ST code is > executed, which would explain a lot. > That would also mean that the current VM for XP is buggy. > Could anybody verify this? Günther I run XP here and have on occasions had trouble, but deleting the sm directory and downloading again always fixed it. As for stability it seems fine for my usage pattern. Bob *** Confidentiality Notice *** Proprietary/Confidential Information belonging to CGI Group Inc. and its affiliates may be contained in this message. If you are not a recipient indicated or intended in this message (or responsible for delivery of this message to such person), or you think for any reason that this message may have been addressed to you in error, you may not use or copy or deliver this message to anyone else. In such case, you should destroy this message and are asked to notify the sender by reply email. |
|
|
Bob,
which VM are you using? Günther Cowdery, Bob [UK] schrieb: > >> are there any other WinXP users out there who have trouble using >> SqueakMap on a virgin 3.8 image? > >> I have massive problems here, CPU going up to 100% and so on. > >> I *believe* that is caused by a primitive failure where the ST code is >> executed, which would explain a lot. > >> That would also mean that the current VM for XP is buggy. > >> Could anybody verify this? > > Günther > > I run XP here and have on occasions had trouble, but deleting the sm directory and downloading again always fixed it. As for stability it seems fine for my usage pattern. > > Bob > > > *** Confidentiality Notice *** Proprietary/Confidential > Information belonging to CGI Group Inc. and its affiliates > may be contained in this message. If you are not a recipient > indicated or intended in this message (or responsible for > delivery of this message to such person), or you think for > any reason that this message may have been addressed to you > in error, you may not use or copy or deliver this message > to anyone else. In such case, you should destroy this > message and are asked to notify the sender by reply email. > > |
|
|
In reply to this post by Bob.Cowdery
Hi Günter,
same (as Bob describes) for me here on WinXP. I'm using the 3.7/8/9 images with the 3.7.1 VM. If you want, we can try to debug your situation off list. Start with alt-F2 -> Display Version Information and send me a (any) SqueakDebug.log file which was written by the VM you use. /Klaus On Sun, 04 Jun 2006 16:35:50 +0200, Cowdery, Bob [UK] <[hidden email]> wrote: > Günther wrote: > >> are there any other WinXP users out there who have trouble using >> SqueakMap on a virgin 3.8 image? > >> I have massive problems here, CPU going up to 100% and so on. > >> I *believe* that is caused by a primitive failure where the ST code is >> executed, which would explain a lot. > >> That would also mean that the current VM for XP is buggy. > >> Could anybody verify this? > > Günther > > I run XP here and have on occasions had trouble, but deleting the sm > directory and downloading again always fixed it. As for stability it > seems fine for my usage pattern. > > Bob > > > *** Confidentiality Notice *** Proprietary/Confidential > Information belonging to CGI Group Inc. and its affiliates > may be contained in this message. If you are not a recipient > indicated or intended in this message (or responsible for > delivery of this message to such person), or you think for > any reason that this message may have been addressed to you > in error, you may not use or copy or deliver this message > to anyone else. In such case, you should destroy this > message and are asked to notify the sender by reply email. > > |
|
|
In reply to this post by Günther Schmidt
3.8-6665 Bob >> which VM are you using? Günther Cowdery, Bob [UK] schrieb:
>
*** Confidentiality Notice ***
Proprietary/Confidential |
|
|
In reply to this post by Günther Schmidt
Hi Günther,
I didn't answer because I didn't have a virgin 3.8 around, but my experience with XP and SM has been fine. I thought I give it a try for you, so I downloaded a fresh 3.8 image, and I opened SM. It asked to be upgraded so I upgraded SM and that worked fine. I used SM to download the games package. I played a nice game of chess and won. Checking my image it's running very nicely with no CPU problems at all. I'm sorry if that's no help but I did enjoy the chess game! (Thank you Andreas) It works fine for me. Ron Teitelbaum > From: Günther Schmidt > Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 10:27 AM > > Hi all, > > are there any other WinXP users out there who have trouble using > SqueakMap on a virgin 3.8 image? > > I have massive problems here, CPU going up to 100% and so on. > > I *believe* that is caused by a primitive failure where the ST code is > executed, which would explain a lot. > > That would also mean that the current VM for XP is buggy. > > Could anybody verify this? > > Günther > > |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |