about http://bugs.impara.de/view.php?id=1840

> On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 01:34:52PM +0200, stéphane ducasse wrote:
>> tim lewis?
>>
>> should we push that fix in 3.9?
>
> Oops, sorry, I have not gotten around to testing this.  It's back on
> my to-do list now.
>
> But note that the unit tests for long delays may take quite a while
> to run ;-)

>> Oops, sorry, I have not gotten around to testing this.  It's back on
>> my to-do list now.
>>
>> But note that the unit tests for long delays may take quite a while
>> to run ;-)
>
> John McI made a special vm to test this, with a very short timer  
> cycle. Combined with a couple of equivalent changes in the image it  
> allowed testing reasonably effectively, so we may need to repeat.
>
> I was just about to check that the code would load sensibly in 3.9  
> but it seems squeak.org is taking a little vacation right now.
>
>
> tim
> --
> tim Rowledge; [hidden email]; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
> Useful Latin Phrases:- Fac ut vivas. = Get a life.
>
>
>
>

>
> On 22-Apr-06, at 6:02 AM, David T. Lewis wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 01:34:52PM +0200, stéphane ducasse wrote:
> >> tim lewis?
> >>
> >> should we push that fix in 3.9?
> >
> > Oops, sorry, I have not gotten around to testing this.  It's back on
> > my to-do list now.
> >
> > But note that the unit tests for long delays may take quite a while
> > to run ;-)
>
> John McI made a special vm to test this, with a very short timer  
> cycle. Combined with a couple of equivalent changes in the image it  
> allowed testing reasonably effectively, so we may need to repeat.
>
> I was just about to check that the code would load sensibly in 3.9  
> but it seems squeak.org is taking a little vacation right now.