|
Thank you for your kind post, Darren Christian DeHaven.
Academics are stereotyped, perhaps correctly, as publish or perish of crap,
Hofstadter got immunity.
I don't know what a blog is, though I know of examples.
I did worry about joining this list because I think the metaphor of one
fellow shouting in a room
by e mailing hundreds of people at a time
was a bad sort of way for people to amicably write to each other and
collaborate.
There is something called Deborah Tannen frame which I now illustrate.
You say something psychologically demeaning to a group in the frame of a
large group
which is intended in private frame to a noob lost as to what is going on
and it comes across in that public frame as shaden freude, most Nazi
narcisism.
I was perhaps too analytic in my blunder to say I was sorry for my not
noticing reply was set to autoreply
which was obscured by an external web e mail yahoo field being truncated.
If you had intention of publicly psychoanalysing a world it would be
very insulting.
Most people haven't studied Tannen as I have.
This probably led to the Abe Arkoff social self reaction.
I feel that the only politically correct subject being what is the
politically correct subject
is the sort of thing wrote about as fun in a blog I found. I won't
continue the flame. Flames aren't fun.
Now in Jobim code Medetacio.
|