Hi All,
looks to me that classCommentBlank should /not/ check for an existing comment but simply answer the computed template. Agreed? I thought I'd check the mc history to be more informed, but I can't connect to box4.squeak.org. Where is the history these days? best,
Eliot |
Hi Eliot, I am working on restoring the history function right now.
I'm currently running a job which is rebuilding it on box4, but box4 is excruciatingly slow and I'm just using Cog instead of Spur due to that String <= problem (the invalid stack frame). I hope to have it working again later this week. Sorry for the inconvenience! On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Eliot Miranda <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi All, > > looks to me that classCommentBlank should /not/ check for an existing > comment but simply answer the computed template. Agreed? I thought I'd > check the mc history to be more informed, but I can't connect to > box4.squeak.org. Where is the history these days? > > -- > best, > Eliot |
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Chris Muller <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi Eliot, I am working on restoring the history function right now. Hmm, we should fix that. Does it still happen with 3312? Got a reproducible case if so?
best,
Eliot |
Yes, those two tar balls I uploaded to your mirandabanda last week,
from our other thread, "Reproducible problem with String>>#<=". One of the tar balls has the image saved with the debugger open on what I think looks like the invalid stack frame; where you can see the VM has chosen to execute the code in the wrong order. (PS -- I don't think it has to do with becoming on the stack, but I'm not positive about that). (PPS -- in that image, note that another debuger will pop up from startup code when the image launches about a file not found, just ignore that one). The other tar ball is one that can reproduce the problem; unfortunately, not quickly and not always in the same place, but it did eventually happen when I tried to load several thousand mcz's. Unlike my past tests, this job is a single-core task, not multicore, so a bit easier on your machine in case you decide to run it. But I didn't try it iwth the latest Spur 3312 VM yet. However, I have the 3312 coglinuxht VM doing it on box4 right now for 13000 mcz's. It is almost half done, other than that problem yesterday ("halt: no free methods; cannot compact.") it has been running smoothly. Only about halfway done now probably another couple of days to finish.. On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Eliot Miranda <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Chris Muller <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> Hi Eliot, I am working on restoring the history function right now. >> I'm currently running a job which is rebuilding it on box4, but box4 >> is excruciatingly slow and I'm just using Cog instead of Spur due to >> that String <= problem (the invalid stack frame). > > > Hmm, we should fix that. Does it still happen with 3312? Got a > reproducible case if so? > >> >> I hope to have it working again later this week. Sorry for the >> inconvenience! >> >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Eliot Miranda <[hidden email]> >> wrote: >> > Hi All, >> > >> > looks to me that classCommentBlank should /not/ check for an >> > existing >> > comment but simply answer the computed template. Agreed? I thought I'd >> > check the mc history to be more informed, but I can't connect to >> > box4.squeak.org. Where is the history these days? >> > >> > -- >> > best, >> > Eliot > > > > > -- > best, > Eliot |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |