With fresh Squeak4.2-10950, doing cmd-click no longer pulls up the halos on Mac, does not seem to matter which VM.
Ken At 11:24 AM -0600 1/31/11, Chris Muller apparently wrote: >Squeak4.2-10950.zip is now available at http://ftp.squeak.org/4.2, >which is intended to be the actual-released 4.2 image (unless we find >some problem, which we won't). > >The trunk will be reopened shortly, thanks for your patience. > > - Chris |
In reply to this post by Chris Muller-3
Same problem in trunk?
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Ken G. Brown <[hidden email]> wrote: > With fresh Squeak4.2-10950, doing cmd-click no longer pulls up the halos on Mac, does not seem to matter which VM. > > Ken > > > At 11:24 AM -0600 1/31/11, Chris Muller apparently wrote: >>Squeak4.2-10950.zip is now available at http://ftp.squeak.org/4.2, >>which is intended to be the actual-released 4.2 image (unless we find >>some problem, which we won't). >> >>The trunk will be reopened shortly, thanks for your patience. >> >> - Chris > > > |
No, trunk seems to pull up the halos with cmd-click.
Latest trunk I have is Squeak4.2-10779-alpha updated to ->10918 Ken At 5:29 PM -0600 2/2/11, Chris Muller apparently wrote: >Same problem in trunk? > >On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Ken G. Brown <[hidden email]> wrote: >> With fresh Squeak4.2-10950, doing cmd-click no longer pulls up the halos on Mac, does not seem to matter which VM. >> >> Ken >> >> >> At 11:24 AM -0600 1/31/11, Chris Muller apparently wrote: >>>Squeak4.2-10950.zip is now available at http://ftp.squeak.org/4.2, >>>which is intended to be the actual-released 4.2 image (unless we find >>>some problem, which we won't). >>> >>>The trunk will be reopened shortly, thanks for your patience. >>> >>> - Chris >> >> >> |
In reply to this post by Chris Muller-3
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011, Chris Muller wrote:
> Same problem in trunk? You changed the preference in the image, didn't you? The VMs are not changed yet. Levente > > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Ken G. Brown <[hidden email]> wrote: >> With fresh Squeak4.2-10950, doing cmd-click no longer pulls up the halos on Mac, does not seem to matter which VM. >> >> Ken >> >> >> At 11:24 AM -0600 1/31/11, Chris Muller apparently wrote: >>> Squeak4.2-10950.zip is now available at http://ftp.squeak.org/4.2, >>> which is intended to be the actual-released 4.2 image (unless we find >>> some problem, which we won't). >>> >>> The trunk will be reopened shortly, thanks for your patience. >>> >>> - Chris >> >> >> > > |
swapMouseButtons was toggled, yes. That might be the problem, Ken.
2011/2/2 Levente Uzonyi <[hidden email]>: > On Wed, 2 Feb 2011, Chris Muller wrote: > >> Same problem in trunk? > > You changed the preference in the image, didn't you? The VMs are not changed > yet. > > > Levente > >> >> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Ken G. Brown <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> With fresh Squeak4.2-10950, doing cmd-click no longer pulls up the halos >>> on Mac, does not seem to matter which VM. >>> >>> Ken >>> >>> >>> At 11:24 AM -0600 1/31/11, Chris Muller apparently wrote: >>>> >>>> Squeak4.2-10950.zip is now available at http://ftp.squeak.org/4.2, >>>> which is intended to be the actual-released 4.2 image (unless we find >>>> some problem, which we won't). >>>> >>>> The trunk will be reopened shortly, thanks for your patience. >>>> >>>> - Chris >>> >>> >>> >> > > > > |
Yes, de-selecting swapMouseButtons seems to make cmd-click bring up halos.
There is still this issue <http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7587> related to resizing morphic windows. Ken At 8:03 PM -0600 2/2/11, Chris Muller apparently wrote: >swapMouseButtons was toggled, yes. That might be the problem, Ken. > > >2011/2/2 Levente Uzonyi <[hidden email]>: >> On Wed, 2 Feb 2011, Chris Muller wrote: >> >>> Same problem in trunk? >> >> You changed the preference in the image, didn't you? The VMs are not changed >> yet. >> >> >> Levente >> >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Ken G. Brown <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> >>>> With fresh Squeak4.2-10950, doing cmd-click no longer pulls up the halos >>>> on Mac, does not seem to matter which VM. >>>> >>>> Ken >>>> >>>> >>>> At 11:24 AM -0600 1/31/11, Chris Muller apparently wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Squeak4.2-10950.zip is now available at http://ftp.squeak.org/4.2, >>>>> which is intended to be the actual-released 4.2 image (unless we find >>>>> some problem, which we won't). >>>>> >>>>> The trunk will be reopened shortly, thanks for your patience. >>>>> >>>>> - Chris >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> |
In reply to this post by Levente Uzonyi-2
On 2 February 2011 02:19, Levente Uzonyi <[hidden email]> wrote:
Just in case anyone is still having problems getting OB into a 4.2 image... I put a pragmatic solution for this into the inbox as Morphic-MAD.512, but the problem with the unexpected changes to the postscript and pre-amble seem to have derailed its adoption, so for anyone having problems with the loading of OmniBrowser, here's a more reliable version of that part of the "Extending the system" samples: "Omnibrowser including Refactoring engine and OCompletion. Version 1.2" Installer ss project: 'MetacelloRepository'; install: 'ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser'. ((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser) project perform: #version: with: '1.2') load: #(Dev). "Omnibrowser latest release - may include Pharo-specific code!!" (Installer ss project: ''MetacelloRepository'') install: ''ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser''. ((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser) project perform: #lastVersion) load: #(Dev). I've just tested it with a virgin 4.2 install, and the first snippet loads OB fine. |
Hi guys,
To change the squeak.org website, it is 4.2 out or not? I just saw a Weekly Squeak article but on the other side I see here a lot of problem reports... Best regards Janko On 03. 02. 2011 20:51, Michael Davies wrote: > On 2 February 2011 02:19, Levente Uzonyi <[hidden email] > <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote: > > On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Dale Henrichs wrote: > > > Looking a little closer, it looks like 4.2 is supposed to use > the same set of packages as Pharo which implies that the > repository should be > 'http://source.lukas-renggli.ch/omnibrowser' in the > configuration baseline and not http://source.wiresong.ca/ob. My > guess is that the packages were in the package-cache when the > configuration was tested. > > > I doubt that would work. Lukas' version of OB has Pharo specific > code which is not compatible with Squeak. > > > Just in case anyone is still having problems getting OB into a 4.2 image... > > I put a pragmatic solution for this into the inbox as Morphic-MAD.512, > but the problem with the unexpected changes to the postscript and > pre-amble seem to have derailed its adoption, so for anyone having > problems with the loading of OmniBrowser, here's a more reliable version > of that part of the "Extending the system" samples: > > "Omnibrowser including Refactoring engine and OCompletion. Version 1.2" > Installer ss project: 'MetacelloRepository'; install: > 'ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser'. > ((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser) project perform: #version: > with: '1.2') load: #(Dev). > > "Omnibrowser latest release - may include Pharo-specific code!!" > (Installer ss project: ''MetacelloRepository'') install: > ''ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser''. > ((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser) project perform: > #lastVersion) load: #(Dev). > > > I've just tested it with a virgin 4.2 install, and the first snippet > loads OB fine. > > > > -- Janko Mivšek AIDA/Web Smalltalk Web Application Server http://www.aidaweb.si |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |