With the flurry of Issue updates it should be obvious that I am headed
towards another Metacello release. I've done my own issue triage and come up with a (first cut) list of candidate bugs for 1.0-beta.32[1]. If you don't see your favorite issue on that list or your favorite issue is not listed as a Critical or High priority, then now is a good time to let me know. Also, if you've got a pet peeve or comment that you've been keeping to yourself, now would be a good time to drop me a note or submit an issue ... Dale [1] http://code.google.com/p/metacello/issues/list?can=2&q=Milestone%3D1.0-beta.32&sort=milestone [sorry if this is a duplicate message. I sent this out this morning and did not see it on the list] |
I guess this could be called a sprint, but I'm the only one sprinting:) and it's more like a 10K run than a sprint:)
Dale ----- Original Message ----- | From: "Dale" <[hidden email]> | To: "Metacello" <[hidden email]> | Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 4:45:52 PM | Subject: [Metacello] heading towards 1.0-beta.32 | | With the flurry of Issue updates it should be obvious that I am | headed | towards another Metacello release. I've done my own issue triage and | come up with a (first cut) list of candidate bugs for 1.0-beta.32[1]. | If you don't see your favorite issue on that list or your favorite | issue is not listed as a Critical or High priority, then now is a | good | time to let me know. | | Also, if you've got a pet peeve or comment that you've been keeping | to | yourself, now would be a good time to drop me a note or submit an | issue ... | | Dale | | [1] | http://code.google.com/p/metacello/issues/list?can=2&q=Milestone%3D1.0-beta.32&sort=milestone | | [sorry if this is a duplicate message. I sent this out this morning | and did not see it on the list] | |
In reply to this post by Dale Henrichs
On Jan 19, 2012, at 1:45 AM, Dale wrote: > With the flurry of Issue updates it should be obvious that I am headed > towards another Metacello release. Great! > I've done my own issue triage and > come up with a (first cut) list of candidate bugs for 1.0-beta.32[1]. > If you don't see your favorite issue on that list or your favorite > issue is not listed as a Critical or High priority, then now is a good > time to let me know. > > Also, if you've got a pet peeve or comment that you've been keeping to > yourself, now would be a good time to drop me a note or submit an > issue … I would love to see how we can strengthen the API for versionString, file -> package: and others > > Dale > > [1] http://code.google.com/p/metacello/issues/list?can=2&q=Milestone%3D1.0-beta.32&sort=milestone > > [sorry if this is a duplicate message. I sent this out this morning > and did not see it on the list] |
In reply to this post by Dale Henrichs
Cool!!!!
Go go go! We are currently working on a new GUI fancy for Metacello. We will announce it in the coming weeks. Alexandre On 18 Jan 2012, at 22:10, Dale Henrichs wrote: > I guess this could be called a sprint, but I'm the only one sprinting:) and it's more like a 10K run than a sprint:) > > Dale > > ----- Original Message ----- > | From: "Dale" <[hidden email]> > | To: "Metacello" <[hidden email]> > | Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 4:45:52 PM > | Subject: [Metacello] heading towards 1.0-beta.32 > | > | With the flurry of Issue updates it should be obvious that I am > | headed > | towards another Metacello release. I've done my own issue triage and > | come up with a (first cut) list of candidate bugs for 1.0-beta.32[1]. > | If you don't see your favorite issue on that list or your favorite > | issue is not listed as a Critical or High priority, then now is a > | good > | time to let me know. > | > | Also, if you've got a pet peeve or comment that you've been keeping > | to > | yourself, now would be a good time to drop me a note or submit an > | issue ... > | > | Dale > | > | [1] > | http://code.google.com/p/metacello/issues/list?can=2&q=Milestone%3D1.0-beta.32&sort=milestone > | > | [sorry if this is a duplicate message. I sent this out this morning > | and did not see it on the list] > | -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. |
In reply to this post by stephane ducasse-2
Stef,
I've got your api changes recorded in Issue 154[1], so you might want to take a look at the issue and make comments there (I extracted an initial proposal in the comment) as you see fit ... Dale [1] http://code.google.com/p/metacello/issues/detail?id=154 ----- Original Message ----- | From: "stephane ducasse" <[hidden email]> | To: [hidden email] | Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 12:41:18 AM | Subject: Re: [Metacello] heading towards 1.0-beta.32 | | | On Jan 19, 2012, at 1:45 AM, Dale wrote: | | > With the flurry of Issue updates it should be obvious that I am | > headed | > towards another Metacello release. | | Great! | | > I've done my own issue triage and | > come up with a (first cut) list of candidate bugs for | > 1.0-beta.32[1]. | > If you don't see your favorite issue on that list or your favorite | > issue is not listed as a Critical or High priority, then now is a | > good | > time to let me know. | > | > Also, if you've got a pet peeve or comment that you've been keeping | > to | > yourself, now would be a good time to drop me a note or submit an | > issue … | | I would love to see how we can strengthen the API for versionString, | file -> package: | and others | | > | > Dale | > | > [1] | > http://code.google.com/p/metacello/issues/list?can=2&q=Milestone%3D1.0-beta.32&sort=milestone | > | > [sorry if this is a duplicate message. I sent this out this morning | > and did not see it on the list] | | |
In reply to this post by abergel
Alexandre,
That's great to hear! Do you need the dependency api additions for your release? Dale ----- Original Message ----- | From: "Alexandre Bergel" <[hidden email]> | To: [hidden email] | Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 5:41:45 AM | Subject: Re: [Metacello] heading towards 1.0-beta.32 | | Cool!!!! | Go go go! We are currently working on a new GUI fancy for Metacello. | We will announce it in the coming weeks. | | Alexandre | | | On 18 Jan 2012, at 22:10, Dale Henrichs wrote: | | > I guess this could be called a sprint, but I'm the only one | > sprinting:) and it's more like a 10K run than a sprint:) | > | > Dale | > | > ----- Original Message ----- | > | From: "Dale" <[hidden email]> | > | To: "Metacello" <[hidden email]> | > | Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 4:45:52 PM | > | Subject: [Metacello] heading towards 1.0-beta.32 | > | | > | With the flurry of Issue updates it should be obvious that I am | > | headed | > | towards another Metacello release. I've done my own issue triage | > | and | > | come up with a (first cut) list of candidate bugs for | > | 1.0-beta.32[1]. | > | If you don't see your favorite issue on that list or your | > | favorite | > | issue is not listed as a Critical or High priority, then now is a | > | good | > | time to let me know. | > | | > | Also, if you've got a pet peeve or comment that you've been | > | keeping | > | to | > | yourself, now would be a good time to drop me a note or submit an | > | issue ... | > | | > | Dale | > | | > | [1] | > | http://code.google.com/p/metacello/issues/list?can=2&q=Milestone%3D1.0-beta.32&sort=milestone | > | | > | [sorry if this is a duplicate message. I sent this out this | > | morning | > | and did not see it on the list] | > | | | -- | _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: | Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu | ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. | | | | | | |
> That's great to hear! Do you need the dependency api additions for your release?
Yes, ideally, we would like to have a +Package button and a +Dependency when we select a baseline. Cheers, Alexandre NB: Juan Pablo, you should subscribe to the Metacello mailing list. > > ----- Original Message ----- > | From: "Alexandre Bergel" <[hidden email]> > | To: [hidden email] > | Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 5:41:45 AM > | Subject: Re: [Metacello] heading towards 1.0-beta.32 > | > | Cool!!!! > | Go go go! We are currently working on a new GUI fancy for Metacello. > | We will announce it in the coming weeks. > | > | Alexandre > | > | > | On 18 Jan 2012, at 22:10, Dale Henrichs wrote: > | > | > I guess this could be called a sprint, but I'm the only one > | > sprinting:) and it's more like a 10K run than a sprint:) > | > > | > Dale > | > > | > ----- Original Message ----- > | > | From: "Dale" <[hidden email]> > | > | To: "Metacello" <[hidden email]> > | > | Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 4:45:52 PM > | > | Subject: [Metacello] heading towards 1.0-beta.32 > | > | > | > | With the flurry of Issue updates it should be obvious that I am > | > | headed > | > | towards another Metacello release. I've done my own issue triage > | > | and > | > | come up with a (first cut) list of candidate bugs for > | > | 1.0-beta.32[1]. > | > | If you don't see your favorite issue on that list or your > | > | favorite > | > | issue is not listed as a Critical or High priority, then now is a > | > | good > | > | time to let me know. > | > | > | > | Also, if you've got a pet peeve or comment that you've been > | > | keeping > | > | to > | > | yourself, now would be a good time to drop me a note or submit an > | > | issue ... > | > | > | > | Dale > | > | > | > | [1] > | > | http://code.google.com/p/metacello/issues/list?can=2&q=Milestone%3D1.0-beta.32&sort=milestone > | > | > | > | [sorry if this is a duplicate message. I sent this out this > | > | morning > | > | and did not see it on the list] > | > | > | > | -- > | _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > | Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > | ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > | > | > | > | > | > | -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. |
Alexandre,
I plan to include the additions in this release, so I'll let you know when I've added the new api and you can take it for a spin ... Dale ----- Original Message ----- | From: "Alexandre Bergel" <[hidden email]> | To: [hidden email] | Cc: "Juan Pablo Sandoval Alcocer" <[hidden email]> | Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 9:41:34 AM | Subject: Re: [Metacello] heading towards 1.0-beta.32 | | > That's great to hear! Do you need the dependency api additions for | > your release? | | Yes, ideally, we would like to have a +Package button and a | +Dependency when we select a baseline. | | Cheers, | Alexandre | | NB: Juan Pablo, you should subscribe to the Metacello mailing list. | | | > | > ----- Original Message ----- | > | From: "Alexandre Bergel" <[hidden email]> | > | To: [hidden email] | > | Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 5:41:45 AM | > | Subject: Re: [Metacello] heading towards 1.0-beta.32 | > | | > | Cool!!!! | > | Go go go! We are currently working on a new GUI fancy for | > | Metacello. | > | We will announce it in the coming weeks. | > | | > | Alexandre | > | | > | | > | On 18 Jan 2012, at 22:10, Dale Henrichs wrote: | > | | > | > I guess this could be called a sprint, but I'm the only one | > | > sprinting:) and it's more like a 10K run than a sprint:) | > | > | > | > Dale | > | > | > | > ----- Original Message ----- | > | > | From: "Dale" <[hidden email]> | > | > | To: "Metacello" <[hidden email]> | > | > | Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 4:45:52 PM | > | > | Subject: [Metacello] heading towards 1.0-beta.32 | > | > | | > | > | With the flurry of Issue updates it should be obvious that I | > | > | am | > | > | headed | > | > | towards another Metacello release. I've done my own issue | > | > | triage | > | > | and | > | > | come up with a (first cut) list of candidate bugs for | > | > | 1.0-beta.32[1]. | > | > | If you don't see your favorite issue on that list or your | > | > | favorite | > | > | issue is not listed as a Critical or High priority, then now | > | > | is a | > | > | good | > | > | time to let me know. | > | > | | > | > | Also, if you've got a pet peeve or comment that you've been | > | > | keeping | > | > | to | > | > | yourself, now would be a good time to drop me a note or | > | > | submit an | > | > | issue ... | > | > | | > | > | Dale | > | > | | > | > | [1] | > | > | http://code.google.com/p/metacello/issues/list?can=2&q=Milestone%3D1.0-beta.32&sort=milestone | > | > | | > | > | [sorry if this is a duplicate message. I sent this out this | > | > | morning | > | > | and did not see it on the list] | > | > | | > | | > | -- | > | _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: | > | Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu | > | ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. | > | | > | | > | | > | | > | | > | | | -- | _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: | Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu | ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. | | | | | | |
Cool!!!!!!!
Alexandre On 19 Jan 2012, at 14:44, Dale Henrichs wrote: > Alexandre, > > I plan to include the additions in this release, so I'll let you know when I've added the new api and you can take it for a spin ... > > Dale > > ----- Original Message ----- > | From: "Alexandre Bergel" <[hidden email]> > | To: [hidden email] > | Cc: "Juan Pablo Sandoval Alcocer" <[hidden email]> > | Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 9:41:34 AM > | Subject: Re: [Metacello] heading towards 1.0-beta.32 > | > | > That's great to hear! Do you need the dependency api additions for > | > your release? > | > | Yes, ideally, we would like to have a +Package button and a > | +Dependency when we select a baseline. > | > | Cheers, > | Alexandre > | > | NB: Juan Pablo, you should subscribe to the Metacello mailing list. > | > | > | > > | > ----- Original Message ----- > | > | From: "Alexandre Bergel" <[hidden email]> > | > | To: [hidden email] > | > | Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 5:41:45 AM > | > | Subject: Re: [Metacello] heading towards 1.0-beta.32 > | > | > | > | Cool!!!! > | > | Go go go! We are currently working on a new GUI fancy for > | > | Metacello. > | > | We will announce it in the coming weeks. > | > | > | > | Alexandre > | > | > | > | > | > | On 18 Jan 2012, at 22:10, Dale Henrichs wrote: > | > | > | > | > I guess this could be called a sprint, but I'm the only one > | > | > sprinting:) and it's more like a 10K run than a sprint:) > | > | > > | > | > Dale > | > | > > | > | > ----- Original Message ----- > | > | > | From: "Dale" <[hidden email]> > | > | > | To: "Metacello" <[hidden email]> > | > | > | Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 4:45:52 PM > | > | > | Subject: [Metacello] heading towards 1.0-beta.32 > | > | > | > | > | > | With the flurry of Issue updates it should be obvious that I > | > | > | am > | > | > | headed > | > | > | towards another Metacello release. I've done my own issue > | > | > | triage > | > | > | and > | > | > | come up with a (first cut) list of candidate bugs for > | > | > | 1.0-beta.32[1]. > | > | > | If you don't see your favorite issue on that list or your > | > | > | favorite > | > | > | issue is not listed as a Critical or High priority, then now > | > | > | is a > | > | > | good > | > | > | time to let me know. > | > | > | > | > | > | Also, if you've got a pet peeve or comment that you've been > | > | > | keeping > | > | > | to > | > | > | yourself, now would be a good time to drop me a note or > | > | > | submit an > | > | > | issue ... > | > | > | > | > | > | Dale > | > | > | > | > | > | [1] > | > | > | http://code.google.com/p/metacello/issues/list?can=2&q=Milestone%3D1.0-beta.32&sort=milestone > | > | > | > | > | > | [sorry if this is a duplicate message. I sent this out this > | > | > | morning > | > | > | and did not see it on the list] > | > | > | > | > | > | > | -- > | > | _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > | > | Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > | > | ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | -- > | _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > | Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > | ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > | > | > | > | > | > | -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |