heading towards 1.0-beta.32

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
9 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

heading towards 1.0-beta.32

Dale Henrichs
With the flurry of Issue updates it should be obvious that I am headed
towards another Metacello release. I've done my own issue triage and
come up with a (first cut) list of candidate bugs for 1.0-beta.32[1].
If you don't see your favorite issue on that list or your favorite
issue is not listed as a Critical or High priority, then now is a good
time to let me know.

Also, if you've got a pet peeve or comment that you've been keeping to
yourself, now would be a good time to drop me a note or submit an
issue ...

Dale

[1] http://code.google.com/p/metacello/issues/list?can=2&q=Milestone%3D1.0-beta.32&sort=milestone

[sorry if this is a duplicate message. I sent this out this morning
and did not see it on the list]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: heading towards 1.0-beta.32

Dale Henrichs
I guess this could be called a sprint, but I'm the only one sprinting:) and it's more like a 10K run than a sprint:)

Dale

----- Original Message -----
| From: "Dale" <[hidden email]>
| To: "Metacello" <[hidden email]>
| Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 4:45:52 PM
| Subject: [Metacello] heading towards 1.0-beta.32
|
| With the flurry of Issue updates it should be obvious that I am
| headed
| towards another Metacello release. I've done my own issue triage and
| come up with a (first cut) list of candidate bugs for 1.0-beta.32[1].
| If you don't see your favorite issue on that list or your favorite
| issue is not listed as a Critical or High priority, then now is a
| good
| time to let me know.
|
| Also, if you've got a pet peeve or comment that you've been keeping
| to
| yourself, now would be a good time to drop me a note or submit an
| issue ...
|
| Dale
|
| [1]
| http://code.google.com/p/metacello/issues/list?can=2&q=Milestone%3D1.0-beta.32&sort=milestone
|
| [sorry if this is a duplicate message. I sent this out this morning
| and did not see it on the list]
|
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: heading towards 1.0-beta.32

stephane ducasse-2
In reply to this post by Dale Henrichs

On Jan 19, 2012, at 1:45 AM, Dale wrote:

> With the flurry of Issue updates it should be obvious that I am headed
> towards another Metacello release.

Great!

> I've done my own issue triage and
> come up with a (first cut) list of candidate bugs for 1.0-beta.32[1].
> If you don't see your favorite issue on that list or your favorite
> issue is not listed as a Critical or High priority, then now is a good
> time to let me know.
>
> Also, if you've got a pet peeve or comment that you've been keeping to
> yourself, now would be a good time to drop me a note or submit an
> issue …

I would love to see how we can strengthen the API for versionString, file -> package:
and others

>
> Dale
>
> [1] http://code.google.com/p/metacello/issues/list?can=2&q=Milestone%3D1.0-beta.32&sort=milestone
>
> [sorry if this is a duplicate message. I sent this out this morning
> and did not see it on the list]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: heading towards 1.0-beta.32

abergel
In reply to this post by Dale Henrichs
Cool!!!!
Go go go! We are currently working on a new GUI fancy for Metacello. We will announce it in the coming weeks.

Alexandre


On 18 Jan 2012, at 22:10, Dale Henrichs wrote:

> I guess this could be called a sprint, but I'm the only one sprinting:) and it's more like a 10K run than a sprint:)
>
> Dale
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> | From: "Dale" <[hidden email]>
> | To: "Metacello" <[hidden email]>
> | Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 4:45:52 PM
> | Subject: [Metacello] heading towards 1.0-beta.32
> |
> | With the flurry of Issue updates it should be obvious that I am
> | headed
> | towards another Metacello release. I've done my own issue triage and
> | come up with a (first cut) list of candidate bugs for 1.0-beta.32[1].
> | If you don't see your favorite issue on that list or your favorite
> | issue is not listed as a Critical or High priority, then now is a
> | good
> | time to let me know.
> |
> | Also, if you've got a pet peeve or comment that you've been keeping
> | to
> | yourself, now would be a good time to drop me a note or submit an
> | issue ...
> |
> | Dale
> |
> | [1]
> | http://code.google.com/p/metacello/issues/list?can=2&q=Milestone%3D1.0-beta.32&sort=milestone
> |
> | [sorry if this is a duplicate message. I sent this out this morning
> | and did not see it on the list]
> |

--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.





Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: heading towards 1.0-beta.32

Dale Henrichs
In reply to this post by stephane ducasse-2
Stef,

I've got your api changes recorded in Issue 154[1], so you might want to take a look at the issue and make comments there (I extracted an initial proposal in the comment) as you see fit ...

Dale

[1] http://code.google.com/p/metacello/issues/detail?id=154

----- Original Message -----
| From: "stephane ducasse" <[hidden email]>
| To: [hidden email]
| Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 12:41:18 AM
| Subject: Re: [Metacello] heading towards 1.0-beta.32
|
|
| On Jan 19, 2012, at 1:45 AM, Dale wrote:
|
| > With the flurry of Issue updates it should be obvious that I am
| > headed
| > towards another Metacello release.
|
| Great!
|
| > I've done my own issue triage and
| > come up with a (first cut) list of candidate bugs for
| > 1.0-beta.32[1].
| > If you don't see your favorite issue on that list or your favorite
| > issue is not listed as a Critical or High priority, then now is a
| > good
| > time to let me know.
| >
| > Also, if you've got a pet peeve or comment that you've been keeping
| > to
| > yourself, now would be a good time to drop me a note or submit an
| > issue …
|
| I would love to see how we can strengthen the API for versionString,
| file -> package:
| and others
|
| >
| > Dale
| >
| > [1]
| > http://code.google.com/p/metacello/issues/list?can=2&q=Milestone%3D1.0-beta.32&sort=milestone
| >
| > [sorry if this is a duplicate message. I sent this out this morning
| > and did not see it on the list]
|
|
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: heading towards 1.0-beta.32

Dale Henrichs
In reply to this post by abergel
Alexandre,

That's great to hear! Do you need the dependency api additions for your release?

Dale

----- Original Message -----
| From: "Alexandre Bergel" <[hidden email]>
| To: [hidden email]
| Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 5:41:45 AM
| Subject: Re: [Metacello] heading towards 1.0-beta.32
|
| Cool!!!!
| Go go go! We are currently working on a new GUI fancy for Metacello.
| We will announce it in the coming weeks.
|
| Alexandre
|
|
| On 18 Jan 2012, at 22:10, Dale Henrichs wrote:
|
| > I guess this could be called a sprint, but I'm the only one
| > sprinting:) and it's more like a 10K run than a sprint:)
| >
| > Dale
| >
| > ----- Original Message -----
| > | From: "Dale" <[hidden email]>
| > | To: "Metacello" <[hidden email]>
| > | Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 4:45:52 PM
| > | Subject: [Metacello] heading towards 1.0-beta.32
| > |
| > | With the flurry of Issue updates it should be obvious that I am
| > | headed
| > | towards another Metacello release. I've done my own issue triage
| > | and
| > | come up with a (first cut) list of candidate bugs for
| > | 1.0-beta.32[1].
| > | If you don't see your favorite issue on that list or your
| > | favorite
| > | issue is not listed as a Critical or High priority, then now is a
| > | good
| > | time to let me know.
| > |
| > | Also, if you've got a pet peeve or comment that you've been
| > | keeping
| > | to
| > | yourself, now would be a good time to drop me a note or submit an
| > | issue ...
| > |
| > | Dale
| > |
| > | [1]
| > | http://code.google.com/p/metacello/issues/list?can=2&q=Milestone%3D1.0-beta.32&sort=milestone
| > |
| > | [sorry if this is a duplicate message. I sent this out this
| > | morning
| > | and did not see it on the list]
| > |
|
| --
| _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
| Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
| ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: heading towards 1.0-beta.32

abergel
> That's great to hear! Do you need the dependency api additions for your release?

Yes, ideally, we would like to have a +Package button and a +Dependency when we select a baseline.

Cheers,
Alexandre

NB: Juan Pablo, you should subscribe to the Metacello mailing list.


>
> ----- Original Message -----
> | From: "Alexandre Bergel" <[hidden email]>
> | To: [hidden email]
> | Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 5:41:45 AM
> | Subject: Re: [Metacello] heading towards 1.0-beta.32
> |
> | Cool!!!!
> | Go go go! We are currently working on a new GUI fancy for Metacello.
> | We will announce it in the coming weeks.
> |
> | Alexandre
> |
> |
> | On 18 Jan 2012, at 22:10, Dale Henrichs wrote:
> |
> | > I guess this could be called a sprint, but I'm the only one
> | > sprinting:) and it's more like a 10K run than a sprint:)
> | >
> | > Dale
> | >
> | > ----- Original Message -----
> | > | From: "Dale" <[hidden email]>
> | > | To: "Metacello" <[hidden email]>
> | > | Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 4:45:52 PM
> | > | Subject: [Metacello] heading towards 1.0-beta.32
> | > |
> | > | With the flurry of Issue updates it should be obvious that I am
> | > | headed
> | > | towards another Metacello release. I've done my own issue triage
> | > | and
> | > | come up with a (first cut) list of candidate bugs for
> | > | 1.0-beta.32[1].
> | > | If you don't see your favorite issue on that list or your
> | > | favorite
> | > | issue is not listed as a Critical or High priority, then now is a
> | > | good
> | > | time to let me know.
> | > |
> | > | Also, if you've got a pet peeve or comment that you've been
> | > | keeping
> | > | to
> | > | yourself, now would be a good time to drop me a note or submit an
> | > | issue ...
> | > |
> | > | Dale
> | > |
> | > | [1]
> | > | http://code.google.com/p/metacello/issues/list?can=2&q=Milestone%3D1.0-beta.32&sort=milestone
> | > |
> | > | [sorry if this is a duplicate message. I sent this out this
> | > | morning
> | > | and did not see it on the list]
> | > |
> |
> | --
> | _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> | Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
> | ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |

--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.





Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: heading towards 1.0-beta.32

Dale Henrichs
Alexandre,

I plan to include the additions in this release, so I'll let you know when I've added the new api and you can take it for a spin ...

Dale

----- Original Message -----
| From: "Alexandre Bergel" <[hidden email]>
| To: [hidden email]
| Cc: "Juan Pablo Sandoval Alcocer" <[hidden email]>
| Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 9:41:34 AM
| Subject: Re: [Metacello] heading towards 1.0-beta.32
|
| > That's great to hear! Do you need the dependency api additions for
| > your release?
|
| Yes, ideally, we would like to have a +Package button and a
| +Dependency when we select a baseline.
|
| Cheers,
| Alexandre
|
| NB: Juan Pablo, you should subscribe to the Metacello mailing list.
|
|
| >
| > ----- Original Message -----
| > | From: "Alexandre Bergel" <[hidden email]>
| > | To: [hidden email]
| > | Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 5:41:45 AM
| > | Subject: Re: [Metacello] heading towards 1.0-beta.32
| > |
| > | Cool!!!!
| > | Go go go! We are currently working on a new GUI fancy for
| > | Metacello.
| > | We will announce it in the coming weeks.
| > |
| > | Alexandre
| > |
| > |
| > | On 18 Jan 2012, at 22:10, Dale Henrichs wrote:
| > |
| > | > I guess this could be called a sprint, but I'm the only one
| > | > sprinting:) and it's more like a 10K run than a sprint:)
| > | >
| > | > Dale
| > | >
| > | > ----- Original Message -----
| > | > | From: "Dale" <[hidden email]>
| > | > | To: "Metacello" <[hidden email]>
| > | > | Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 4:45:52 PM
| > | > | Subject: [Metacello] heading towards 1.0-beta.32
| > | > |
| > | > | With the flurry of Issue updates it should be obvious that I
| > | > | am
| > | > | headed
| > | > | towards another Metacello release. I've done my own issue
| > | > | triage
| > | > | and
| > | > | come up with a (first cut) list of candidate bugs for
| > | > | 1.0-beta.32[1].
| > | > | If you don't see your favorite issue on that list or your
| > | > | favorite
| > | > | issue is not listed as a Critical or High priority, then now
| > | > | is a
| > | > | good
| > | > | time to let me know.
| > | > |
| > | > | Also, if you've got a pet peeve or comment that you've been
| > | > | keeping
| > | > | to
| > | > | yourself, now would be a good time to drop me a note or
| > | > | submit an
| > | > | issue ...
| > | > |
| > | > | Dale
| > | > |
| > | > | [1]
| > | > | http://code.google.com/p/metacello/issues/list?can=2&q=Milestone%3D1.0-beta.32&sort=milestone
| > | > |
| > | > | [sorry if this is a duplicate message. I sent this out this
| > | > | morning
| > | > | and did not see it on the list]
| > | > |
| > |
| > | --
| > | _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
| > | Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
| > | ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
| > |
| > |
| > |
| > |
| > |
| > |
|
| --
| _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
| Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
| ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: heading towards 1.0-beta.32

abergel
Cool!!!!!!!

Alexandre


On 19 Jan 2012, at 14:44, Dale Henrichs wrote:

> Alexandre,
>
> I plan to include the additions in this release, so I'll let you know when I've added the new api and you can take it for a spin ...
>
> Dale
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> | From: "Alexandre Bergel" <[hidden email]>
> | To: [hidden email]
> | Cc: "Juan Pablo Sandoval Alcocer" <[hidden email]>
> | Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 9:41:34 AM
> | Subject: Re: [Metacello] heading towards 1.0-beta.32
> |
> | > That's great to hear! Do you need the dependency api additions for
> | > your release?
> |
> | Yes, ideally, we would like to have a +Package button and a
> | +Dependency when we select a baseline.
> |
> | Cheers,
> | Alexandre
> |
> | NB: Juan Pablo, you should subscribe to the Metacello mailing list.
> |
> |
> | >
> | > ----- Original Message -----
> | > | From: "Alexandre Bergel" <[hidden email]>
> | > | To: [hidden email]
> | > | Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 5:41:45 AM
> | > | Subject: Re: [Metacello] heading towards 1.0-beta.32
> | > |
> | > | Cool!!!!
> | > | Go go go! We are currently working on a new GUI fancy for
> | > | Metacello.
> | > | We will announce it in the coming weeks.
> | > |
> | > | Alexandre
> | > |
> | > |
> | > | On 18 Jan 2012, at 22:10, Dale Henrichs wrote:
> | > |
> | > | > I guess this could be called a sprint, but I'm the only one
> | > | > sprinting:) and it's more like a 10K run than a sprint:)
> | > | >
> | > | > Dale
> | > | >
> | > | > ----- Original Message -----
> | > | > | From: "Dale" <[hidden email]>
> | > | > | To: "Metacello" <[hidden email]>
> | > | > | Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 4:45:52 PM
> | > | > | Subject: [Metacello] heading towards 1.0-beta.32
> | > | > |
> | > | > | With the flurry of Issue updates it should be obvious that I
> | > | > | am
> | > | > | headed
> | > | > | towards another Metacello release. I've done my own issue
> | > | > | triage
> | > | > | and
> | > | > | come up with a (first cut) list of candidate bugs for
> | > | > | 1.0-beta.32[1].
> | > | > | If you don't see your favorite issue on that list or your
> | > | > | favorite
> | > | > | issue is not listed as a Critical or High priority, then now
> | > | > | is a
> | > | > | good
> | > | > | time to let me know.
> | > | > |
> | > | > | Also, if you've got a pet peeve or comment that you've been
> | > | > | keeping
> | > | > | to
> | > | > | yourself, now would be a good time to drop me a note or
> | > | > | submit an
> | > | > | issue ...
> | > | > |
> | > | > | Dale
> | > | > |
> | > | > | [1]
> | > | > | http://code.google.com/p/metacello/issues/list?can=2&q=Milestone%3D1.0-beta.32&sort=milestone
> | > | > |
> | > | > | [sorry if this is a duplicate message. I sent this out this
> | > | > | morning
> | > | > | and did not see it on the list]
> | > | > |
> | > |
> | > | --
> | > | _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> | > | Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
> | > | ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
> | > |
> | > |
> | > |
> | > |
> | > |
> | > |
> |
> | --
> | _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> | Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
> | ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |

--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.