http://build.squeak.org/ down?

> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 08:37:56PM -0400, Chris Cunnington wrote:
> > On Oct 14, 2014, at 8:14 PM, Dale Henrichs <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > Getting a 503 at the moment ...
>
> Yes. I noticed this morning that Chris Muller has started a new SS process
> on box4. And the usual address [1] is routing to the default when there is
> no service on box2. I conclude that he is moving SS to box4 and is in-between
> boxes. I would imagine that the process on box4 needs to be announced by
> routing the dns on box2 to its new location [2].
>

> > On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 08:37:56PM -0400, Chris Cunnington wrote:
> > > On Oct 14, 2014, at 8:14 PM, Dale Henrichs <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Getting a 503 at the moment ...
> >
> > Yes. I noticed this morning that Chris Muller has started a new SS process
> > on box4. And the usual address [1] is routing to the default when there is
> > no service on box2. I conclude that he is moving SS to box4 and is in-between
> > boxes. I would imagine that the process on box4 needs to be announced by
> > routing the dns on box2 to its new location [2].
> >
>
> No this is nothing to do with anything on box4. The build.squeak.org service
> is on box3 along with squeaksource.com. Squeaksource is fine, but Jenkins is
> not. There are currently about 30 Squeak VMs of various flavors running under
> the Jenkins uid. Ick. I'll try to restart the Jenkins service and see if I can
> clear out the mess.
>
> Dave
>

> Actually, I misread the question and saw what I wanted to see. The question was about build.squeak.org <http://build.squeak.org/> and I thought I saw trunk.squeak.org <http://trunk.squeak.org/>.
> Seems to me that what I???m saying about trunk.squeak.org <http://trunk.squeak.org/> is still true: it has been shut down on its usual subdomain; and, a new process has appeared on box4.
> Looks to me like trunk development is halted for the moment.
>
> Chris
>
> > On Oct 14, 2014, at 8:52 PM, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 08:37:56PM -0400, Chris Cunnington wrote:
> >>> On Oct 14, 2014, at 8:14 PM, Dale Henrichs <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Getting a 503 at the moment ...
> >>
> >> Yes. I noticed this morning that Chris Muller has started a new SS process
> >> on box4. And the usual address [1] is routing to the default when there is
> >> no service on box2. I conclude that he is moving SS to box4 and is in-between
> >> boxes. I would imagine that the process on box4 needs to be announced by
> >> routing the dns on box2 to its new location [2].
> >>
> >
> > No this is nothing to do with anything on box4. The build.squeak.org service
> > is on box3 along with squeaksource.com. Squeaksource is fine, but Jenkins is
> > not. There are currently about 30 Squeak VMs of various flavors running under
> > the Jenkins uid. Ick. I'll try to restart the Jenkins service and see if I can
> > clear out the mess.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
>

> On Oct 14, 2014, at 11:19 PM, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Chris,
>
> I do not understand what you mean. If Chris Muller had wanted to make a change
> that affected our servers or the trunk development process, I am sure he would
> have cleared it with Levente and mentioned it on box-admins, as any of us would
> do if we were making such a change.
>
> Trunk development happens on source.squeak.org. The mirror of source.squeak.org
> that runs on http://box4.squeak.org:8888 with a Magma back end has been in service
> for a long time, and has been discussed on squeak-dev. As far as I am aware,
> nothing has changed on any of the outward facing boxes.
>
> So no, trunk development is not halted. The only thing that happened is that
> the Jenkins service melted down, and I restarted it.
>
> Dave
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 09:45:38PM -0400, Chris Cunnington wrote:
>> Actually, I misread the question and saw what I wanted to see. The question was about build.squeak.org <http://build.squeak.org/> and I thought I saw trunk.squeak.org <http://trunk.squeak.org/>.
>> Seems to me that what I???m saying about trunk.squeak.org <http://trunk.squeak.org/> is still true: it has been shut down on its usual subdomain; and, a new process has appeared on box4.
>> Looks to me like trunk development is halted for the moment.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>> On Oct 14, 2014, at 8:52 PM, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 08:37:56PM -0400, Chris Cunnington wrote:
>>>>> On Oct 14, 2014, at 8:14 PM, Dale Henrichs <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Getting a 503 at the moment ...
>>>>
>>>> Yes. I noticed this morning that Chris Muller has started a new SS process
>>>> on box4. And the usual address [1] is routing to the default when there is
>>>> no service on box2. I conclude that he is moving SS to box4 and is in-between
>>>> boxes. I would imagine that the process on box4 needs to be announced by
>>>> routing the dns on box2 to its new location [2].
>>>>
>>>
>>> No this is nothing to do with anything on box4. The build.squeak.org service
>>> is on box3 along with squeaksource.com. Squeaksource is fine, but Jenkins is
>>> not. There are currently about 30 Squeak VMs of various flavors running under
>>> the Jenkins uid. Ick. I'll try to restart the Jenkins service and see if I can
>>> clear out the mess.
>>>
>>> Dave
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>>
>
>

> > On Oct 14, 2014, at 8:14 PM, Dale Henrichs <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > Getting a 503 at the moment ...
>
> Yes. I noticed this morning that Chris Muller has started a new SS process
> on box4. And the usual address [1] is routing to the default when there is
> no service on box2. I conclude that he is moving SS to box4 and is in-between
> boxes. I would imagine that the process on box4 needs to be announced by
> routing the dns on box2 to its new location [2].
>