if this is a problem we can roll back

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
12 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

if this is a problem we can roll back

stéphane ducasse-2
Hi

apparently in 3.9-7000 we have some problems with the iconic button  
and flaps.
So we can either roll-back or fix it.
Let us know what you prefer.

Stef
_______________________________________________
Morphic mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/morphic
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: if this is a problem we can roll back

Marcus Denker

On 21.02.2006, at 09:11, stéphane ducasse wrote:

> Hi
>
> apparently in 3.9-7000 we have some problems with the iconic button  
> and flaps.
> So we can either roll-back or fix it.
> Let us know what you prefer.
>

Fixing. I'd do a 7001 today.

     Marcus_______________________________________________
Morphic mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/morphic
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Re: if this is a problem we can roll back

Juan Vuletich
Hi guys,

I'm repeating this from the other thread...

I will new versions of the packages later today.

I will take again a fresh 6729 image and repeat the process, but instead of
trusting the versions of my packages loaded in there, I will load them from
the 3.9a repository.

Why? Because on a fresh 6729 image, if I save locally Etoys, I get a 611 Kb
file, while the one in the 3.9a repository is 625. So there we seem to have
the problem.

Please tell me if this sounds ok to you.

Cheers,
Juan Vuletich
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marcus Denker" <[hidden email]>
To: "stéphane ducasse" <[hidden email]>
Cc: <[hidden email]>; "Squeak 3.9"
<[hidden email]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 5:20 AM
Subject: [Morphic] Re: if this is a problem we can roll back



On 21.02.2006, at 09:11, stéphane ducasse wrote:

> Hi
>
> apparently in 3.9-7000 we have some problems with the iconic button  and
> flaps.
> So we can either roll-back or fix it.
> Let us know what you prefer.
>

Fixing. I'd do a 7001 today.

     Marcus_______________________________________________
Morphic mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/morphic


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.11/264 - Release Date: 2/17/2006


_______________________________________________
Morphic mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/morphic
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Re: if this is a problem we can roll back

Marcus Denker
I did the following:

  -> loaded etoy-md-6
  -> saved it as md-7

It seems that this fixed the problem...

On 21.02.2006, at 11:08, Juan Vuletich wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> I'm repeating this from the other thread...
>
> I will new versions of the packages later today.
>
> I will take again a fresh 6729 image and repeat the process, but  
> instead of
> trusting the versions of my packages loaded in there, I will load  
> them from
> the 3.9a repository.
>
> Why? Because on a fresh 6729 image, if I save locally Etoys, I get  
> a 611 Kb
> file, while the one in the 3.9a repository is 625. So there we seem  
> to have
> the problem.
>
> Please tell me if this sounds ok to you.
>
> Cheers,
> Juan Vuletich
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marcus Denker"  
> <[hidden email]>
> To: "stéphane ducasse" <[hidden email]>
> Cc: <[hidden email]>; "Squeak 3.9"  
> <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 5:20 AM
> Subject: [Morphic] Re: if this is a problem we can roll back
>
>
>
> On 21.02.2006, at 09:11, stéphane ducasse wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> apparently in 3.9-7000 we have some problems with the iconic  
>> button  and flaps.
>> So we can either roll-back or fix it.
>> Let us know what you prefer.
>>
>
> Fixing. I'd do a 7001 today.
>
>     Marcus_______________________________________________
> Morphic mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/morphic
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.11/264 - Release Date:  
> 2/17/2006
>
>

_______________________________________________
Morphic mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/morphic
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Re: if this is a problem we can roll back

Juan Vuletich
I'm ready to publish new versions. (Based on reloading etoys-md.6 and the
others from the 3.9a repository, so I did the same as you).

Do I proceed?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Marcus Denker" <[hidden email]>
To: "Juan Vuletich" <[hidden email]>
Cc: "stéphane ducasse" <[hidden email]>;
<[hidden email]>; "Squeak 3.9"
<[hidden email]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 7:16 AM
Subject: Re: [Morphic] Re: if this is a problem we can roll back


I did the following:

  -> loaded etoy-md-6
  -> saved it as md-7

It seems that this fixed the problem...

On 21.02.2006, at 11:08, Juan Vuletich wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> I'm repeating this from the other thread...
>
> I will new versions of the packages later today.
>
> I will take again a fresh 6729 image and repeat the process, but  instead
> of
> trusting the versions of my packages loaded in there, I will load  them
> from
> the 3.9a repository.
>
> Why? Because on a fresh 6729 image, if I save locally Etoys, I get  a 611
> Kb
> file, while the one in the 3.9a repository is 625. So there we seem  to
> have
> the problem.
>
> Please tell me if this sounds ok to you.
>
> Cheers,
> Juan Vuletich
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marcus Denker"  <[hidden email]>
> To: "stéphane ducasse" <[hidden email]>
> Cc: <[hidden email]>; "Squeak 3.9"
> <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 5:20 AM
> Subject: [Morphic] Re: if this is a problem we can roll back
>
>
>
> On 21.02.2006, at 09:11, stéphane ducasse wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> apparently in 3.9-7000 we have some problems with the iconic  button  and
>> flaps.
>> So we can either roll-back or fix it.
>> Let us know what you prefer.
>>
>
> Fixing. I'd do a 7001 today.
>
>     Marcus_______________________________________________
> Morphic mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/morphic
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.11/264 - Release Date:
> 2/17/2006
>
>



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.11/264 - Release Date: 2/17/2006


_______________________________________________
Morphic mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/morphic
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Re: if this is a problem we can roll back

Marcus Denker

On 21.02.2006, at 11:25, Juan Vuletich wrote:

> I'm ready to publish new versions. (Based on reloading etoys-md.6  
> and the others from the 3.9a repository, so I did the same as you).
>
> Do I proceed?
>

Ok, yes, I think that's best. The same error could have happened e.g.  
with Moric-Extras, so it's best to get new packages from you.

      Marcus
_______________________________________________
Morphic mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/morphic
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Re: if this is a problem we can roll back

Juan Vuletich
Hi Marcus,

I've just uploaded new versions, but they have the same problem as before. I
must be doing something wrong. Please don't load them. I'll try again at
noon here (in about 3 or 4 hours).

I apologize for the delays.

Juan Vuletich
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marcus Denker" <[hidden email]>
To: "Juan Vuletich" <[hidden email]>
Cc: "stéphane ducasse" <[hidden email]>;
<[hidden email]>; "Squeak 3.9"
<[hidden email]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 7:29 AM
Subject: Re: [Morphic] Re: if this is a problem we can roll back


>
> On 21.02.2006, at 11:25, Juan Vuletich wrote:
>
>> I'm ready to publish new versions. (Based on reloading etoys-md.6  and
>> the others from the 3.9a repository, so I did the same as you).
>>
>> Do I proceed?
>>
>
> Ok, yes, I think that's best. The same error could have happened e.g.
> with Moric-Extras, so it's best to get new packages from you.
>
>      Marcus
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.11/264 - Release Date: 2/17/2006
>
>

_______________________________________________
Morphic mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/morphic
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Re: if this is a problem we can roll back

Marcus Denker

On 21.02.2006, at 13:09, Juan Vuletich wrote:

> Hi Marcus,
>
> I've just uploaded new versions, but they have the same problem as  
> before. I must be doing something wrong. Please don't load them.  
> I'll try again at noon here (in about 3 or 4 hours).
>

So what is important: I think you loaded a .cs that re-organzised the  
categories on Object. So until that's different, you can't save a  
working eToy package

The other problem (for me and stef): It's not possible to load a  
package over the faulty one, as, somehow, MC just merges the old  
deletions and we then
have the old problem. So as soon as we have the correct packages, we  
should re-do 7000 to fix the problem.

(This is all so badly complex... we need to improve the tools!)

> I apologize for the delays.
>

No problem!

     Marcus
_______________________________________________
Morphic mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/morphic
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Re: if this is a problem we can roll back

Juan Vuletich-2
Hi Marcus,

> So what is important: I think you loaded a .cs that re-organzised the
> categories on Object. So until that's different, you can't save a  working
> eToy package

Yes. One of the fixes did that. I thought that not saving the Kernel package
was enough. I was wrong. I corrected this, removing the class
reorganizations.

I'm ready to save the packages, but now I can not connect to
http://source.squeakfoundation.org/inbox/ . It says: "Bad Gateway The proxy
server received an invalid response from an upstream server."

Does anybody know what could be happening here?

> The other problem (for me and stef): It's not possible to load a  package
> over the faulty one, as, somehow, MC just merges the old  deletions and we
> then
> have the old problem. So as soon as we have the correct packages, we
> should re-do 7000 to fix the problem.

That's too bad :( .

Juan Vuletich

_______________________________________________
Morphic mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/morphic
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Re: if this is a problem we can roll back

Juan Vuletich
In reply to this post by Marcus Denker
Hi Marcus,

> So what is important: I think you loaded a .cs that re-organzised the
> categories on Object. So until that's different, you can't save a  working
> eToy package

Yes. One of the fixes did that. I thought that not saving the Kernel package
was enough. I was wrong. I corrected this, removing the class
reorganizations.

I'm ready to save the packages, but now I can not connect to
http://source.squeakfoundation.org/inbox/ . It says: "Bad Gateway The proxy
server received an invalid response from an upstream server."

Does anybody know what could be happening here?

> The other problem (for me and stef): It's not possible to load a  package
> over the faulty one, as, somehow, MC just merges the old  deletions and we
> then
> have the old problem. So as soon as we have the correct packages, we
> should re-do 7000 to fix the problem.

That's too bad :( .

Juan Vuletich

_______________________________________________
Morphic mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/morphic
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Re: if this is a problem we can roll back

Juan Vuletich
Hi Marcus,

I saved again the packages in inbox. Hopefully everything works ok now.

Thanks for your patience.

Juan Vuletich
----- Original Message -----
From: "Juan Vuletich" <[hidden email]>
To: "Marcus Denker" <[hidden email]>
Cc: <[hidden email]>; "Squeak 3.9"
<[hidden email]>; "stéphane ducasse"
<[hidden email]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Morphic] Re: if this is a problem we can roll back


> Hi Marcus,
>
>> So what is important: I think you loaded a .cs that re-organzised the
>> categories on Object. So until that's different, you can't save a
>> working eToy package
>
> Yes. One of the fixes did that. I thought that not saving the Kernel
> package
> was enough. I was wrong. I corrected this, removing the class
> reorganizations.
>
> I'm ready to save the packages, but now I can not connect to
> http://source.squeakfoundation.org/inbox/ . It says: "Bad Gateway The
> proxy
> server received an invalid response from an upstream server."
>
> Does anybody know what could be happening here?
>
>> The other problem (for me and stef): It's not possible to load a  package
>> over the faulty one, as, somehow, MC just merges the old  deletions and
>> we then
>> have the old problem. So as soon as we have the correct packages, we
>> should re-do 7000 to fix the problem.
>
> That's too bad :( .
>
> Juan Vuletich
> _______________________________________________
> Morphic mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/morphic
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.12/265 - Release Date: 2/20/2006
>
>

_______________________________________________
Morphic mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/morphic
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Re: if this is a problem we can roll back

Marcus Denker

On 21.02.2006, at 19:29, Juan Vuletich wrote:

> Hi Marcus,
>
> I saved again the packages in inbox. Hopefully everything works ok  
> now.
>

Ok, thanks. I will build a new 7000 tonight.

        Marcus
_______________________________________________
Morphic mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/morphic