Smalltalk › Squeak › Squeak - Dev

inlining of #caseOf: appears to break looking for implementors

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

7 messages Options

timrowledge

inlining of #caseOf: appears to break looking for implementors

#caseOf: is inlined, which is all nice and lovely *except* that if you ask for messages sent in such a method - in order to do the perfectly commonplace looking for implementors of one of them - there is no mention of #caseOf: but there is #caseError.

That's a bit annoying.

tim
--
tim Rowledge; [hidden email]; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
Eagles may soar, but weasels aren't sucked into jet engines.

Nicolas Cellier

Re: inlining of #caseOf: appears to break looking for implementors

Hi Tim,

We already have pending fixes for that one.

But the Decompiler will have to be fixed too and it's more involved...

Le dim. 10 mai 2020 à 06:43, tim Rowledge <[hidden email]> a écrit :

#caseOf: is inlined, which is all nice and lovely *except* that if you ask for messages sent in such a method - in order to do the perfectly commonplace looking for implementors of one of them - there is no mention of #caseOf: but there is #caseError.

That's a bit annoying.

tim
--
tim Rowledge; [hidden email]; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
Eagles may soar, but weasels aren't sucked into jet engines.

timrowledge

Re: inlining of #caseOf: appears to break looking for implementors

> On 2020-05-09, at 11:57 PM, Nicolas Cellier <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi Tim,
> We already have pending fixes for that one.

Well that's encouraging...

> But the Decompiler will have to be fixed too and it's more involved...

... and that's puzzling since the browser happily shows the 'right' result when set to show 'decompile'.

tim
--
tim Rowledge; [hidden email]; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
Strange OpCodes: HEM: Hide Evidence of Malfunction

timrowledge

Re: inlining of #caseOf: appears to break looking for implementors

> On 2020-05-10, at 10:27 AM, tim Rowledge <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 2020-05-09, at 11:57 PM, Nicolas Cellier <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Tim,
>> We already have pending fixes for that one.
>
> Well that's encouraging...

And indeed your update seems to fix the fatal recursion. Excellent!

tim
--
tim Rowledge; [hidden email]; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
Useful random insult:- He's not a complete idiot -- some parts are missing.

Nicolas Cellier

Re: inlining of #caseOf: appears to break looking for implementors

The Decompiler did cost me an arm. Half of my brain is dysfunctional now. The surviving neurons are so excited that they would be ready to solve any remaining problem! Of course, that is an illusion, i'd better rest before they cause damages ;)

Le dim. 10 mai 2020 à 19:30, tim Rowledge <[hidden email]> a écrit :

> On 2020-05-10, at 10:27 AM, tim Rowledge <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 2020-05-09, at 11:57 PM, Nicolas Cellier <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Tim,
>> We already have pending fixes for that one.
>
> Well that's encouraging...

And indeed your update seems to fix the fatal recursion. Excellent!

tim
--
tim Rowledge; [hidden email]; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
Useful random insult:- He's not a complete idiot -- some parts are missing.

timrowledge

Re: inlining of #caseOf: appears to break looking for implementors

> On 2020-05-10, at 11:14 AM, Nicolas Cellier <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> The Decompiler did cost me an arm. Half of my brain is dysfunctional now. T

Yeah, been there done that ... or at least I think I remember it. Maybe. What was I saying?

tim
--
tim Rowledge; [hidden email]; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
"Bo***x" said Pooh when Piglet kneed him in the groin.

marcel.taeumel

Re: inlining of #caseOf: appears to break looking for implementors

In reply to this post by Nicolas Cellier

Hi Nicolas,

maybe add chocolate? :-)

Best,

Marcel

Am 10.05.2020 20:14:35 schrieb Nicolas Cellier <[hidden email]>:

The Decompiler did cost me an arm. Half of my brain is dysfunctional now. The surviving neurons are so excited that they would be ready to solve any remaining problem! Of course, that is an illusion, i'd better rest before they cause damages ;)

Le dim. 10 mai 2020 à 19:30, tim Rowledge <[hidden email]> a écrit :

> On 2020-05-10, at 10:27 AM, tim Rowledge <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 2020-05-09, at 11:57 PM, Nicolas Cellier <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Tim,
>> We already have pending fixes for that one.
>
> Well that's encouraging...

And indeed your update seems to fix the fatal recursion. Excellent!

tim
--
tim Rowledge; [hidden email]; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
Useful random insult:- He's not a complete idiot -- some parts are missing.