Smalltalk › Squeak › Squeak VM

[interrogative] Are .lo files the appropriate shared object files?

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

3 messages Options

Robert Withers-2

[interrogative] Are .lo files the appropriate shared object files?

In other words, if I preserve the .lo files, can I drop them dynamically
on a squeak installation and have them used?

tyk, r

Tobias Pape

Re: [interrogative] Are .lo files the appropriate shared object files?

> On 02.03.2020, at 22:05, Robert <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>
> In other words, if I preserve the .lo files, can I drop them dynamically
> on a squeak installation and have them used?
>
> tyk, r

No.
That's just libtool stuff, not even object data, no sane person understands that stuff

\ | /
q o.O b

-t

Robert Withers-2

Re: [interrogative] Are .lo files the appropriate shared object files?

Alright then, I must wait until my mvm can run successfully and make the
whole show!

k, r

On 3/2/20 4:25 PM, Tobias Pape wrote:

>
>> On 02.03.2020, at 22:05, Robert <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> In other words, if I preserve the .lo files, can I drop them dynamically
>> on a squeak installation and have them used?
>>
>> tyk, r
> No.
> That's just libtool stuff, not even object data, no sane person understands that stuff
>
> \ | /
> q o.O b
>
> -t
>