is 3.9 mailing-list working?

hi

it seems that the message I sent to v3.9 did not get throw.
[hidden email]

Marcus can you have a look?

stef

Here are some the emails I sent which did not show up.



From: stéphane ducasse <[hidden email]>
Date: 29 avril 2006 23:20:25 HAEC
To: "Squeak 3.9" <[hidden email]>
Subject: Fwd: Fun with Number readFrom: What should we do ?



Begin forwarded message:

From: nicolas cellier <[hidden email]>
Date: 29 avril 2006 23:03:17 HAEC
To: stéphane ducasse <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: Fun with Number readFrom: What should we do ?
Reply-To: [hidden email]

Le Samedi 29 Avril 2006 09:54, vous avez écrit :
Nicolas to help us harvesting for 3.9 could you provide us with a
list of the ready
to harvest items.

Stef

changeSet integration-ready:

http://bugs.impara.de/view.php?id=3504
http://bugs.impara.de/view.php?id=3426
http://bugs.impara.de/view.php?id=3373

good changeSet worth a review:

http://bugs.impara.de/view.php?id=3374 (slow down Float>>hash...)
http://bugs.impara.de/view.php?id=2688 (add message  
isNumberExtension...)

changeSet with only partial solution:

http://bugs.impara.de/view.php?id=2701 (this one is safe owever)
http://bugs.impara.de/view.php?id=3493

Nicolas



From: Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]>
Date: 29 avril 2006 23:17:42 HAEC
To: "Squeak 3.9" <[hidden email]>
Cc: Ken Causey <[hidden email]>
Subject: did the files changed location on the server?

Hi

I was planning to do and release 7026 but I cannot find the folder  
anymore on
        sftp [hidden email]

did I do something wrong?

Stef
From: stéphane ducasse <[hidden email]>
Date: 29 avril 2006 22:09:16 HAEC
To: "Squeak 3.9" <[hidden email]>
Subject: Apparently the fix of andrew was ok....

Apparently all the tests run green in 7025 so I do not understand why  
my tests seem broken in 7024.

Stef
From: stéphane ducasse <[hidden email]>
Date: 23 avril 2006 09:40:59 HAEC
To: "Squeak 3.9" <[hidden email]>
Subject: Fwd: I got confused with http://bugs.impara.de/view.php?id=3490



Begin forwarded message:

From: "Andrew P. Black" <[hidden email]>
Date: 23 avril 2006 08:26:06 HAEC
To: stéphane ducasse <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: I got confused with http://bugs.impara.de/view.php?id=3490

I uploaded a test.

Note that all of the issue refers to 3.8, BEFORE the advent of the  
self-evaluating object stuff.  I have also reported a bug with that,  
and have uploaded  a fix.

In one line, the problem is that

        (Compiler evaluate: {1 . 2.  3/4 } printString) =  {1 . 2 . 3/4)

is false.

        Andrew
       


On 22 Apr 2006, at 5:00, stéphane ducasse wrote:

Hi andrew

do you have a test that explains the problem you fix?
In a SelfEvaluatingObjectTest way?

testArray
        "self run: #testArray"

        self assertCode: '#(1 2 3)' print: '#(1 2 3)'.
        self assertCode: '{1 . 2 . 3}' print: '#(1 2 3)'.
        self assertCode: '{1 + 0 . 2 . 3}' print: '#(1 2 3)'.
        self assertCode: '{1 + 0 . 1 @ 2 . 3}' print: '{1 . 1@2 . 3}'.
        self assertCode: '{2@3}' print: '{2@3}'.
        self assertCode: '{Object new}' print:  'an Array(an Object)'.
        self assertCode: '{Rectangle new . Object new}' print:  'an Array
(nil corner: nil an Object)'.
        self assertCode: '{10@10 corner: 20@20 . 100@100 corner: 200@200}'  
print: '{10@10 corner: 20@20 . 100@100 corner: 200@200}'

Stef

Andrew P. Black
Department of Computer Science
Portland State University
+1 503 725 2411





From: Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]>
Date: 23 avril 2006 08:46:28 HAEC
To: "Squeak 3.9" <[hidden email]>
Cc: Diego Deck <[hidden email]>
Subject: some bugs :)

diego can you have a look at these?

http://bugs.impara.de/view.php?id=3495
http://bugs.impara.de/view.php?id=3496
http://bugs.impara.de/view.php?id=3497

From: stéphane ducasse <[hidden email]>
Date: 22 avril 2006 17:48:53 HAEC
To: "Squeak 3.9" <[hidden email]>
Subject: we should look at http://bugs.impara.de/view.php?id=3448


From: stéphane ducasse <[hidden email]>
Date: 22 avril 2006 17:10:45 HAEC
To: "Squeak 3.9" <[hidden email]>
Cc: Diego Deck <[hidden email]>
Subject: we should remove the old preferences browser

On 29.04.2006, at 23:25, stéphane ducasse wrote:

> hi
>
> it seems that the message I sent to v3.9 did not get throw.
> [hidden email]
>


the 3.9 list was moved to mailman, so it's adress is

   [hidden email]

    Marcus