Smalltalk › Squeak › Squeak - Dev

join:

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

2 messages Options

tblanchard

join:

I'd point out that, of those of us who wanted this badly enough to bother writing an implementation, we all implemented the former version (and use it) and not one of us implemented the latter. So I have to ask - do we need it?

On Sep 19, 2006, at 7:40 AM, Keith Hodges wrote:
>so... if you do want the wrong way around for them, we need a right way around for us.

J J-6

RE: join:

>From: Todd Blanchard <[hidden email]>
>Reply-To: The general-purpose Squeak developers
>list<[hidden email]>
>To: [hidden email]
>Subject: join:
>Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 08:19:15 -0700
>
>I'd point out that, of those of us who wanted this badly enough to bother
>writing an implementation, we all implemented the former version (and use
>it) and not one of us implemented the latter. So I have to ask - do we
>need it?
>

Yes but is this because you tried to impliment it how it worked in your
previous language?