On Jun 28, 2007, at 4:29 PM, Jan Stolzenburg wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The "jabberwocky" repository is not mentioned on the wiki page
> "Keeping Image Current". Is this intentionally?
sort of. Jabberwocky is the next release, and is is advertised as
an unstable, development version. This is why we have two different
source code repositories - one for Hedgehog and one for Jabberwocky.
That said, the documentation of all this could be a lot clearer - and
on my list of things to do is keep a current pair of patched images
available for people who don't want to mess with monticello.
> Also, it would help a bit if there is mentioned that you have to add
> "
http://jabberwocky.croquetproject.org:8889/homebase" and not just
> "
http://jabberwocky.croquetproject.org:8889/" if you want to update
> with monticello. This could be mentioned at
> "
http://jabberwocky.croquetproject.org:8889/" itself or on the wiki
> page "Downloads".
>
>
good point.
> Is this the right place for this comment, or should I use the
> "user"-list next time? (If you use "devel", I reply to "devel", or?)
>
this seems like a reasonable place to me.