more debugger

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
7 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

more debugger

Bob Arning-2
put context above receiver, added execution stack, changed highlighting, allow sorting instvars

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/28914094/debugfixpc.37.cs.gz

Cheers,
Bob



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: more debugger

Frank Shearar-3
On 16 September 2013 15:14, Bob Arning <[hidden email]> wrote:
> put context above receiver, added execution stack, changed highlighting,
> allow sorting instvars
>
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/28914094/debugfixpc.37.cs.gz

I'm very happy to see work happening on the Debugger. It could use the
love. I'm a bit worried about whether people are actually trying out
the bits.

One thing that helps in getting review is submitting things to the
Inbox, because that results in a diff getting mailed to the list. I'd
hate to see good work not making it to Trunk because no one actually
pushed the code there!

frank

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: more debugger

Bob Arning-2
I guess this is another area where we will disagree. I'm not a huge fan of diffs on the list. I'm not concerned whether it ever makes it to the trunk. I am finding it enjoyable and if others do as well, fine. If not, that's fine, too.

Cheers,
Bob


On 9/16/13 10:19 AM, Frank Shearar wrote:
On 16 September 2013 15:14, Bob Arning [hidden email] wrote:
put context above receiver, added execution stack, changed highlighting,
allow sorting instvars

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/28914094/debugfixpc.37.cs.gz
I'm very happy to see work happening on the Debugger. It could use the
love. I'm a bit worried about whether people are actually trying out
the bits.

One thing that helps in getting review is submitting things to the
Inbox, because that results in a diff getting mailed to the list. I'd
hate to see good work not making it to Trunk because no one actually
pushed the code there!

frank





Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: more debugger

David T. Lewis
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:29:47AM -0400, Bob Arning wrote:
> I guess this is another area where we will disagree. I'm not a huge fan
> of diffs on the list. I'm not concerned whether it ever makes it to the
> trunk. I am finding it enjoyable and if others do as well, fine. If not,
> that's fine, too.
>
> Cheers,
> Bob

I guess that's why it's called #bobsWay in the change set!

;-)

Dave

>
>
> On 9/16/13 10:19 AM, Frank Shearar wrote:
> >On 16 September 2013 15:14, Bob Arning <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>put context above receiver, added execution stack, changed highlighting,
> >>allow sorting instvars
> >>
> >>https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/28914094/debugfixpc.37.cs.gz
> >I'm very happy to see work happening on the Debugger. It could use the
> >love. I'm a bit worried about whether people are actually trying out
> >the bits.
> >
> >One thing that helps in getting review is submitting things to the
> >Inbox, because that results in a diff getting mailed to the list. I'd
> >hate to see good work not making it to Trunk because no one actually
> >pushed the code there!
> >
> >frank
> >
> >
>

>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: more debugger

Casey Ransberger-2
I can push #bobsWay to the Inbox repo if no one else wants to do it... :)


On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:53 AM, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:29:47AM -0400, Bob Arning wrote:
> I guess this is another area where we will disagree. I'm not a huge fan
> of diffs on the list. I'm not concerned whether it ever makes it to the
> trunk. I am finding it enjoyable and if others do as well, fine. If not,
> that's fine, too.
>
> Cheers,
> Bob

I guess that's why it's called #bobsWay in the change set!

;-)

Dave

>
>
> On 9/16/13 10:19 AM, Frank Shearar wrote:
> >On 16 September 2013 15:14, Bob Arning <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>put context above receiver, added execution stack, changed highlighting,
> >>allow sorting instvars
> >>
> >>https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/28914094/debugfixpc.37.cs.gz
> >I'm very happy to see work happening on the Debugger. It could use the
> >love. I'm a bit worried about whether people are actually trying out
> >the bits.
> >
> >One thing that helps in getting review is submitting things to the
> >Inbox, because that results in a diff getting mailed to the list. I'd
> >hate to see good work not making it to Trunk because no one actually
> >pushed the code there!
> >
> >frank
> >
> >
>

>





--
CALIFORNIA
H  U  M  A  N


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: more debugger

Frank Shearar-3
That would be very kind of you, Casey!

frank

On 17 September 2013 05:12, Casey Ransberger <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I can push #bobsWay to the Inbox repo if no one else wants to do it... :)
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:53 AM, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:29:47AM -0400, Bob Arning wrote:
>> > I guess this is another area where we will disagree. I'm not a huge fan
>> > of diffs on the list. I'm not concerned whether it ever makes it to the
>> > trunk. I am finding it enjoyable and if others do as well, fine. If not,
>> > that's fine, too.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Bob
>>
>> I guess that's why it's called #bobsWay in the change set!
>>
>> ;-)
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > On 9/16/13 10:19 AM, Frank Shearar wrote:
>> > >On 16 September 2013 15:14, Bob Arning <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> > >>put context above receiver, added execution stack, changed
>> > >> highlighting,
>> > >>allow sorting instvars
>> > >>
>> > >>https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/28914094/debugfixpc.37.cs.gz
>> > >I'm very happy to see work happening on the Debugger. It could use the
>> > >love. I'm a bit worried about whether people are actually trying out
>> > >the bits.
>> > >
>> > >One thing that helps in getting review is submitting things to the
>> > >Inbox, because that results in a diff getting mailed to the list. I'd
>> > >hate to see good work not making it to Trunk because no one actually
>> > >pushed the code there!
>> > >
>> > >frank
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> CALIFORNIA
> H  U  M  A  N
>
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: more debugger

Casey Ransberger-2
Okay. I should really be sleeping right now though (d'oh, went to bed early, got woken up at 1am by the crinkling of a bag of chips/crisps) so if I haven't got this done (or run into problems) in around 24hrs, yell at me. I'm interested to see what he's done with this.


On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote:
That would be very kind of you, Casey!

frank

On 17 September 2013 05:12, Casey Ransberger <[hidden email]> wrote:
> I can push #bobsWay to the Inbox repo if no one else wants to do it... :)
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:53 AM, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:29:47AM -0400, Bob Arning wrote:
>> > I guess this is another area where we will disagree. I'm not a huge fan
>> > of diffs on the list. I'm not concerned whether it ever makes it to the
>> > trunk. I am finding it enjoyable and if others do as well, fine. If not,
>> > that's fine, too.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Bob
>>
>> I guess that's why it's called #bobsWay in the change set!
>>
>> ;-)
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > On 9/16/13 10:19 AM, Frank Shearar wrote:
>> > >On 16 September 2013 15:14, Bob Arning <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> > >>put context above receiver, added execution stack, changed
>> > >> highlighting,
>> > >>allow sorting instvars
>> > >>
>> > >>https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/28914094/debugfixpc.37.cs.gz
>> > >I'm very happy to see work happening on the Debugger. It could use the
>> > >love. I'm a bit worried about whether people are actually trying out
>> > >the bits.
>> > >
>> > >One thing that helps in getting review is submitting things to the
>> > >Inbox, because that results in a diff getting mailed to the list. I'd
>> > >hate to see good work not making it to Trunk because no one actually
>> > >pushed the code there!
>> > >
>> > >frank
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>>