Besides programming effort, is there a reason why squeak/pharo shouldn't consider going to a GUI model that includes real multiple native windows?
I'm not a c/c++ programmer and wouldn't know where to begin with that piece, but inside of smalltalk it seems it wouldn't be all that difficult of a refactoring. I only bring this up as this would put pharo/squeak more in line with many other conventional languages (with respect to user interfaces), and get it "back in the game" so to speak for when technologies are being considered for business solutions. You could include in this 1) Native support for drag and drop and 2) support for embedded native controls. Something like SWT and Jide now both support. Sorry if I've overlooked something with this and the con is obvious. thanks sw _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
> Besides programming effort, is there a reason why squeak/pharo > shouldn't consider going to a GUI model that includes real multiple > native windows? I would love to have that we should have a look at ffenestria and fix it. So this is just that somebody should do it. > I'm not a c/c++ programmer and wouldn't know where to begin with > that piece, but inside of smalltalk it seems it wouldn't be all that > difficult of a refactoring. > > I only bring this up as this would put pharo/squeak more in line > with many other conventional languages (with respect to user > interfaces), and get it "back in the game" so to speak for when > technologies are being considered for business solutions. > > You could include in this 1) Native support for drag and drop and 2) > support for embedded native controls. Something like SWT and Jide > now both support. > > Sorry if I've overlooked something with this and the con is obvious. > > thanks > sw Stef _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Steve Wirts
Steve Wirts wrote:
> Besides programming effort, is there a reason why squeak/pharo shouldn't > consider going to a GUI model that includes real multiple native windows? Yes, Morphic ;-) Would be pretty hard to make it work with multiple windows. At least that's the consensus... The infrastructure is basically in place and has been used for prototypes. Also the GTK bindings and Newspeak use native windows (I think?). Michael _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Michael Rueger<[hidden email]> wrote:
> Also the GTK bindings and Newspeak use native windows (I > think?). Newspeak uses either native or morphic windows, depending on the wishes of the user. -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them popular by not having them." James Iry _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
If the primitives existed in pharo that would allow someone to create and control native windows, I would be more than happy to take the time to try and massage morphic into working cleanly/elegantly with multiple windows.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Damien Cassou <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Perhaps you can join forces with the rest of the present alternatives. For example, squeakgtk
I think there is a lot of people that wants native windows so that being able to create desktop applications. Cheers, Mariano 2009/6/11 Steve Wirts <[hidden email]> If the primitives existed in pharo that would allow someone to create and control native windows, I would be more than happy to take the time to try and massage morphic into working cleanly/elegantly with multiple windows. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Steve Wirts
I used Visualworks and Squeak, and frankly, I prefer to have embedded morphic windows in a unique native window, as it is now in Pharo. Application switching is easier in my opinion and I do not feel a need to have an email clients between two code browsers. As the discussion on save and quit testified, people have radically different habits when programming. Even for simple things. Interesting. Cheers, Alexandre On 11 Jun 2009, at 10:58, Steve Wirts wrote: > If the primitives existed in pharo that would allow someone to > create and control native windows, I would be more than happy to > take the time to try and massage morphic into working cleanly/ > elegantly with multiple windows. > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Damien Cassou <[hidden email] > > wrote: > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Michael Rueger<[hidden email]> > wrote: > > Also the GTK bindings and Newspeak use native windows (I > > think?). > > Newspeak uses either native or morphic windows, depending on the > wishes of the user. > > -- > Damien Cassou > http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st > > "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them > popular by not having them." James Iry > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Alexandre Bergel wrote:
> I used Visualworks and Squeak, and frankly, I prefer to have embedded > morphic windows in a unique native window, as it is now in Pharo. > Application switching is easier in my opinion and I do not feel a need > to have an email clients between two code browsers. > As the discussion on save and quit testified, people have radically > different habits when programming. Even for simple things. > Interesting. Indeed. Alos worth noting that the Adobe suite of products basically uses the Squeak mode. But, there is still a case for native windows and if only for dialog boxes ;-) Usage across multiple screens is another argument for having the technical ability for multiple windows. Michael _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Mariano Martinez Peck
Thanks Mariano, I wasn't aware of squeakgtk. It looks like this project (a large project) is trying to create a toolkit of heavyweight controls for squeakers. Something similar to wxSqueak. I'm thinking of something different; all the widget implementation should be left to pharo, morphic is great, and there already exists lots of gui code. I believe the only thing we would need would be the ability create and control a native window(decorated and undecorated), not every kind of native widget.
2009/6/11 Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]> Perhaps you can join forces with the rest of the present alternatives. For example, squeakgtk _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Michael Rueger-6
> Indeed. Alos worth noting that the Adobe suite of products basically
> uses the Squeak mode. > But, there is still a case for native windows and if only for dialog > boxes ;-) > Usage across multiple screens is another argument for having the > technical ability for multiple windows. Exactly, having native windows is something important. However, I think one should use to have pharo windows gathered or not. Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Alexandre Bergel
Would it be ok if this was configurable via a user preference, meaning pharo supported both?
A VisualWorks multiple-native-window capability would open up the possibility of creating a different class of applications. Alot of my work revolves around integration with legacy systems. Having a smalltalk with multiple native windows would allow me to more seamlessly introduce it into the world of tools at my company. thanks sw On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In Newspeak, a dedicated icon enable to switch mode. Quite convenient.
Cheers, Alexandre On 11 Jun 2009, at 12:02, Steve Wirts wrote: > Would it be ok if this was configurable via a user preference, > meaning pharo supported both? > A VisualWorks multiple-native-window capability would open up the > possibility of creating a different class of applications. Alot of > my work revolves around integration with legacy systems. Having a > smalltalk with multiple native windows would allow me to more > seamlessly introduce it into the world of tools at my company. > > thanks > sw > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email] > > wrote: > > I used Visualworks and Squeak, and frankly, I prefer to have embedded > morphic windows in a unique native window, as it is now in Pharo. > Application switching is easier in my opinion and I do not feel a need > to have an email clients between two code browsers. > As the discussion on save and quit testified, people have radically > different habits when programming. Even for simple things. > Interesting. > > Cheers, > Alexandre > > > On 11 Jun 2009, at 10:58, Steve Wirts wrote: > > > If the primitives existed in pharo that would allow someone to > > create and control native windows, I would be more than happy to > > take the time to try and massage morphic into working cleanly/ > > elegantly with multiple windows. > > > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Damien Cassou <[hidden email] > > > wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Michael Rueger<[hidden email]> > > wrote: > > > Also the GTK bindings and Newspeak use native windows (I > > > think?). > > > > Newspeak uses either native or morphic windows, depending on the > > wishes of the user. > > > > -- > > Damien Cassou > > http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st > > > > "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them > > popular by not having them." James Iry > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > [hidden email] > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > [hidden email] > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Steve Wirts
> Would it be ok if this was configurable via a user preference, > meaning pharo supported both? sure. > A VisualWorks multiple-native-window capability would open up the > possibility of creating a different class of applications. Alot of > my work revolves around integration with legacy systems. Having a > smalltalk with multiple native windows would allow me to more > seamlessly introduce it into the world of tools at my company. I really think that if somebody would work on ffenestria we would integrate it. > > > thanks > sw > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email] > > wrote: > > I used Visualworks and Squeak, and frankly, I prefer to have embedded > morphic windows in a unique native window, as it is now in Pharo. > Application switching is easier in my opinion and I do not feel a need > to have an email clients between two code browsers. > As the discussion on save and quit testified, people have radically > different habits when programming. Even for simple things. > Interesting. > > Cheers, > Alexandre > > > On 11 Jun 2009, at 10:58, Steve Wirts wrote: > > > If the primitives existed in pharo that would allow someone to > > create and control native windows, I would be more than happy to > > take the time to try and massage morphic into working cleanly/ > > elegantly with multiple windows. > > > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Damien Cassou <[hidden email] > > > wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Michael Rueger<[hidden email]> > > wrote: > > > Also the GTK bindings and Newspeak use native windows (I > > > think?). > > > > Newspeak uses either native or morphic windows, depending on the > > wishes of the user. > > > > -- > > Damien Cassou > > http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st > > > > "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them > > popular by not having them." James Iry > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > [hidden email] > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > [hidden email] > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
what is ffenestria? links?
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
I thought it was someone's name at first :)
http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/3862 This looks right to me, thanks for the heads up stef. I don't see where there is any code available however. A concrete starting point might be with vm primitives for creating and controlling native windows; once these are in place, it is a matter of creating a small pharo codebase to manage the OS resources(ffenestria), and drawing to them through primitives via the GraphicsContext (bitblitting of course). I would think that most everything in morphic would continue to work as is. does this make sense? If the primitives existed, I could help out, but not being a c/c++ programmer I am at a disadvantage here. 2009/6/11 Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]> what is ffenestria? links? _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
On Jun 11, 2009, at 8:27 PM, Steve Wirts wrote: > I thought it was someone's name at first :) > > http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/3862 > > This looks right to me, thanks for the heads up stef. I don't see > where there is any code available however. A concrete starting > point might be with vm primitives for creating and controlling > native windows; once these are in place, it is a matter of creating > a small pharo codebase to manage the OS resources(ffenestria), and > drawing to them through primitives via the GraphicsContext > (bitblitting of course). I would think that most everything in > morphic would continue to work as is. > > does this make sense? > > If the primitives existed, I could help out, but not being a c/c++ > programmer I am at a disadvantage here. > > > 2009/6/11 Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]> > what is ffenestria? links? > > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email] > > wrote: > > > > Would it be ok if this was configurable via a user preference, > > meaning pharo supported both? > > sure. > > > A VisualWorks multiple-native-window capability would open up the > > possibility of creating a different class of applications. Alot of > > my work revolves around integration with legacy systems. Having a > > smalltalk with multiple native windows would allow me to more > > seamlessly introduce it into the world of tools at my company. > > I really think that if somebody would work on ffenestria we would > integrate it. > > > > > > > thanks > > sw > > > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email] > > > wrote: > > > > I used Visualworks and Squeak, and frankly, I prefer to have > embedded > > morphic windows in a unique native window, as it is now in Pharo. > > Application switching is easier in my opinion and I do not feel a > need > > to have an email clients between two code browsers. > > As the discussion on save and quit testified, people have radically > > different habits when programming. Even for simple things. > > Interesting. > > > > Cheers, > > Alexandre > > > > > > On 11 Jun 2009, at 10:58, Steve Wirts wrote: > > > > > If the primitives existed in pharo that would allow someone to > > > create and control native windows, I would be more than happy to > > > take the time to try and massage morphic into working cleanly/ > > > elegantly with multiple windows. > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Damien Cassou <[hidden email] > > > > wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Michael Rueger<[hidden email]> > > > wrote: > > > > Also the GTK bindings and Newspeak use native windows (I > > > > think?). > > > > > > Newspeak uses either native or morphic windows, depending on the > > > wishes of the user. > > > > > > -- > > > Damien Cassou > > > http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st > > > > > > "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them > > > popular by not having them." James Iry > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Pharo-project mailing list > > > [hidden email] > > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo- > project > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Pharo-project mailing list > > > [hidden email] > > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo- > project > > > > -- > > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > [hidden email] > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > [hidden email] > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project Ffenestri.zip (47K) Download Attachment |
I'll note the Ffenestri.zip has both the Ffenestri and the HostMenu os-
x logic in it. You'll need to be careful and only integrate the Ffenestri logic since the HostMenu logic already was integrated into Pharo and was updated for the new sensor logic so likely loading the "HostMenus-Base.2.cs" for example will break your image. On 11-Jun-09, at 11:35 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > <Ffenestri.zip> -- = = = ======================================================================== John M. McIntosh <[hidden email]> Twitter: squeaker68882 Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd. http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com = = = ======================================================================== _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
thanks john
stef On Jun 11, 2009, at 8:40 PM, John M McIntosh wrote: > I'll note the Ffenestri.zip has both the Ffenestri and the HostMenu > os- > x logic in it. > You'll need to be careful and only integrate the Ffenestri logic since > the HostMenu logic > already was integrated into Pharo and was updated for the new sensor > logic so likely loading > the "HostMenus-Base.2.cs" for example will break your image. > > On 11-Jun-09, at 11:35 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >> <Ffenestri.zip> > > -- > = > = > = > = > = > ====================================================================== > John M. McIntosh <[hidden email]> Twitter: > squeaker68882 > Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd. http:// > www.smalltalkconsulting.com > = > = > = > = > = > ====================================================================== > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Mariano Martinez Peck
I
tried wxsqueak. Demos ar really good, and populating a grid with miliions of
rows is very fast, however you have to turn your mind to build so defensively...
I crashed the wm 3 to 4 times in around 4 hours - effort,m then I gave
up.
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Stéphane Ducasse
2009/6/11 Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]>:
> > >> Would it be ok if this was configurable via a user preference, >> meaning pharo supported both? > > sure. > >> A VisualWorks multiple-native-window capability would open up the >> possibility of creating a different class of applications. Alot of >> my work revolves around integration with legacy systems. Having a >> smalltalk with multiple native windows would allow me to more >> seamlessly introduce it into the world of tools at my company. > > I really think that if somebody would work on ffenestria we would > integrate it. > Do you remember, i started it. Still i don't released anything. But the idea is to move all windowing code into a new plugin , which will have an inherent support of controlling native windows (& events) from image side. >> >> >> thanks >> sw >> >> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email] >> > wrote: >> >> I used Visualworks and Squeak, and frankly, I prefer to have embedded >> morphic windows in a unique native window, as it is now in Pharo. >> Application switching is easier in my opinion and I do not feel a need >> to have an email clients between two code browsers. >> As the discussion on save and quit testified, people have radically >> different habits when programming. Even for simple things. >> Interesting. >> >> Cheers, >> Alexandre >> >> >> On 11 Jun 2009, at 10:58, Steve Wirts wrote: >> >> > If the primitives existed in pharo that would allow someone to >> > create and control native windows, I would be more than happy to >> > take the time to try and massage morphic into working cleanly/ >> > elegantly with multiple windows. >> > >> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Damien Cassou <[hidden email] >> > > wrote: >> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Michael Rueger<[hidden email]> >> > wrote: >> > > Also the GTK bindings and Newspeak use native windows (I >> > > think?). >> > >> > Newspeak uses either native or morphic windows, depending on the >> > wishes of the user. >> > >> > -- >> > Damien Cassou >> > http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st >> > >> > "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them >> > popular by not having them." James Iry >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Pharo-project mailing list >> > [hidden email] >> > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Pharo-project mailing list >> > [hidden email] >> > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |