Smalltalk › Squeak › Squeak - Dev

nameing of Trunk releases off?

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

4 messages Options

Squeak - Dev mailing list

nameing of Trunk releases off?

Hi Folks,

I am downloading the latest trunk image from http://files.squeak.org/trunk/Squeak6.0alpha-20010-64bit/

The "last modified" of the linux .zip (and the trailing portion of the name) reads

Squeak6.0alpha-20010-64bit-202003021730-Linux.zip

2020-10-22 15:24
35.3M
File

Shouldn't the name of the file reflect the date?

cordially,

marcel.taeumel

Re: nameing of Trunk releases off?

Hi Timothy.

> Shouldn't the name of the file reflect the date?

No, that date is from the VM bundled in the archive.

Best,

Marcel

Am 23.10.2020 13:14:13 schrieb gettimothy via Squeak-dev <[hidden email]>:
Hi Folks,

I am downloading the latest trunk image from http://files.squeak.org/trunk/Squeak6.0alpha-20010-64bit/

The "last modified" of the linux .zip (and the trailing portion of the name) reads

Squeak6.0alpha-20010-64bit-202003021730-Linux.zip

2020-10-22 15:24
35.3M
File

Shouldn't the name of the file reflect the date?

cordially,

timrowledge

Re: nameing of Trunk releases off?

If we're still shipping an early March VM in the 'latest' package then surely the bulid/pacakge setup is broken?

> On 2020-10-23, at 4:29 AM, Marcel Taeumel <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi Timothy.
>
> > Shouldn't the name of the file reflect the date?
>
> No, that date is from the VM bundled in the archive.
>
> Best,
> Marcel
>> Am 23.10.2020 13:14:13 schrieb gettimothy via Squeak-dev <[hidden email]>:
>>
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>>
>> I am downloading the latest trunk image from http://files.squeak.org/trunk/Squeak6.0alpha-20010-64bit/
>>
>> The "last modified" of the linux .zip (and the trailing portion of the name) reads
>>
>>
>> Squeak6.0alpha-20010-64bit-202003021730-Linux.zip
>>
>> 2020-10-22 15:24
>> 35.3M
>> File
>>
>> Shouldn't the name of the file reflect the date?
>>
>> cordially,
>>
>>
>>
>

tim
--
tim Rowledge; [hidden email]; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
granary - old folks home

marcel.taeumel

Re: nameing of Trunk releases off?

> If we're still shipping an early March VM in the 'latest' package then surely the bulid/pacakge setup is broken?

We decided to decouple VM releases from Squeak releases. However, it would be possible to use a somewhat stable, more recent VM just for Trunk builds. See:

http://files.squeak.org/base/Squeak-trunk/

http://files.squeak.org/base/Squeak64-trunk/

Best,

Marcel

Am 23.10.2020 18:38:01 schrieb tim Rowledge <[hidden email]>:
If we're still shipping an early March VM in the 'latest' package then surely the bulid/pacakge setup is broken?

> On 2020-10-23, at 4:29 AM, Marcel Taeumel wrote:
>
> Hi Timothy.
>
> > Shouldn't the name of the file reflect the date?
>
> No, that date is from the VM bundled in the archive.
>
> Best,
> Marcel
>> Am 23.10.2020 13:14:13 schrieb gettimothy via Squeak-dev :
>>
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>>
>> I am downloading the latest trunk image from http://files.squeak.org/trunk/Squeak6.0alpha-20010-64bit/
>>
>> The "last modified" of the linux .zip (and the trailing portion of the name) reads
>>
>>
>> Squeak6.0alpha-20010-64bit-202003021730-Linux.zip
>>
>> 2020-10-22 15:24
>> 35.3M
>> File
>>
>> Shouldn't the name of the file reflect the date?
>>
>> cordially,
>>
>>
>>
>

tim
--
tim Rowledge; [hidden email]; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
granary - old folks home